Philidor
|
|
« Reply #45 on: 12:06:41, 29-07-2008 » |
|
The Daily Mail's a huge problem in all this. I've twice been caught sneaking from WH Smith clutching the thing for the coupons! Both were pretty girls, one a big noise in the local SWP (I kid you not. She's a precious jewel, possibly unique: SWP + good looking + smart + funny.) She looked at me up and down with utter contempt. 'It's for the coupons,' I wailed. 'Right,' she said, and made a sucking noise through sculptured Trotskyite lips. A small selection:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Morticia
|
|
« Reply #46 on: 12:24:39, 29-07-2008 » |
|
Phildor, I've never quite managed to steel myself to scuttle furtively out of the shop clutching the DM, despite the lure of the films on offer. Although I suppose I could have sandwiched it inbetween me Guardian I have braved the 'Torygraph' a couple of times though - Kind Hearts and Coronets and Intermezzo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Philidor
|
|
« Reply #47 on: 12:47:50, 29-07-2008 » |
|
George Monbiot and Melanie Phillips sandwiched together like peas in a pod. Imagine! It does, however, get worse. Once you've clipped the precious coupons the temptation is to read the thing. A horrible truth then dawns. It's a very fine paper. They know exactly what their prejudices are, and precisely how to communicate them to their (massive) readership. You can see why politicians become obsessed with middle England. They're better organised, and have a better publicity machine, than the most militant 1970s trade union.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brassbandmaestro
|
|
« Reply #48 on: 13:00:30, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I like collecting those to Philidor. Perhaps me being of the middle-aged bracket and no street cred perhaps, helps!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Philidor
|
|
« Reply #49 on: 13:04:43, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I like collecting those to Philidor. Perhaps me being of the middle-aged bracket and no street cred perhaps, helps!
LOL I call trainers 'daps' and raves 'discos.' Sorry.... back to films. Has 'The Ghost and Mrs Muir' been mentioned? A clever film which operates on several levels. On the one hand, a touching love story, well acted and filmed. On the other, it links with two contemporary themes, one personal, one political. It's about coming to terms with grief, how we're reunited with loved ones after death (or possibly before). This was important in 1947, with so many grieving widows. But it's also about the feisty women who ran the factories and farms while the men were away fighting. After the war they weren't too keen on being shoved back in the kitchen and the film reflects that self-confidence and resistance. A moving film, but light and funny too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ted Ryder
|
|
« Reply #50 on: 13:06:57, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I say Philidor my WH Smiths is nowhere near so much fun. But come on people old films are great fun but has no one been to the pictures since 1956?
|
|
|
Logged
|
I've got to get down to Sidcup.
|
|
|
Philidor
|
|
« Reply #51 on: 13:10:05, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I say Philidor my WH Smiths is nowhere near so much fun. But come on people old films are great fun but has no one been to the pictures since 1956?
Get your own Trot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Morticia
|
|
« Reply #52 on: 13:11:37, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I would like to include an honourable mention here for this Based on a story by J.B. Priestley with Alec Guiness in the Lead Role surrounded by an excellent cast. Some might say it's a weepy, come the end. I prefer the word 'poignant'. It's actually categorised as a comedy and there are some fine comedic moment in there. Bitter-sweet is probably the expression.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Don Basilio
|
|
« Reply #53 on: 13:46:57, 29-07-2008 » |
|
Some one I know, a North London mum and lawyer, told me her parents went abroad for holiday. When they returned they were asking anxiously how everyone was surviving all the terrible things. The question "what terrible things?" produced the answer - their hotel had been providing them with complimentary copies of The Daily Mail every day....
|
|
|
Logged
|
To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven. A time to weep, and a time to laugh: a time to mourn, and a time to dance
|
|
|
Stanley Stewart
|
|
« Reply #54 on: 17:47:41, 29-07-2008 » |
|
A comprehensive Ingmar Bergman season starts on Film4 tonight.
The Seventh Seal (1957) 22.45 hrs 30 July Woody Allen on Bergman *00.35 hrs (20 mins) Summer With Monika (1952) *00.55 hrs 31 " Wild Strawberries (1957) *00.40 hrs 1 August Summer Interlude (1950) *00.50 hrs 2 " Smiles of A Summer Night (1955) *00.45 hrs 4 " Persona (1966) *00.25 hrs
* If recording, early morning schedules are likely to be listed on the previous day, from my date listing, as TV schedules go from 06.00 hrs to 06.00 hrs, i.e. the first three items on my listing will be under 29 July. Please check first.
The Ingmar Bergman films have all been remastered so we are likely to see pristine black and white prints with Gunnar Fischer's stark photography to rivet attention.
Fond memories of seeing the films, originally, at the Academy Cinema, Oxford Street, W1; or traipsing up Fitzjohn's Avenue to see whole seasons at the Everyman, Hampstead.
Bergman used a repertory of first rate actors and I look forward to seeing the work of Max von Sydow, Bibbi Andersson, Gunnel Lindblom, Harrier Andersson and Alf Kjellin again. Perhaps not ideal viewing for the witching hour but I'll be proud to have a set of DVD recordings on my shelves.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pim_derks
|
|
« Reply #55 on: 20:06:42, 29-07-2008 » |
|
A comprehensive Ingmar Bergman season starts on Film4 tonight.
The Seventh Seal (1957) 22.45 hrs 30 July Woody Allen on Bergman *00.35 hrs (20 mins) Summer With Monika (1952) *00.55 hrs 31 " Wild Strawberries (1957) *00.40 hrs 1 August Summer Interlude (1950) *00.50 hrs 2 " Smiles of A Summer Night (1955) *00.45 hrs 4 " Persona (1966) *00.25 hrs Good to see these titles, Stanley. I think member Ted Ryder will be pleased also: three films made after 1956!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"People hate anything well made. It gives them a guilty conscience." John Betjeman
|
|
|
Ted Ryder
|
|
« Reply #56 on: 20:17:08, 29-07-2008 » |
|
I know PD! I've already taken a pill and had a little lie-down.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I've got to get down to Sidcup.
|
|
|
Stanley Stewart
|
|
« Reply #57 on: 21:52:49, 29-07-2008 » |
|
# 41 offbeat and # 44 AndyD Yes, I've also had to rack my brain re " WR Mysteries of the Organism" (1971) but it was directed by Dusan Makavejev and the controversy over its ban in Yugoslavia gave it a notoriety which made it a huge international hit. The word allegorical comes to mind but I'm quite vague after that. However, offbeat, your slip of the pen reminded me that the film was often referred to as "Mysteries of the Orgasm" (unintentionally) and the ban, together with the title variation COULD have added to its box office appeal. There; not many people know that!
You may be interested to know, offbeat, that I'm also a WC Fields devotee and your avatar is always a pleasure to see. Some time ago, I was interested a a DVD box set with 17 WC Fields titles; among them "My Little Chickadee" with Mae West (upstaging each other outrageously), "It's A Gift", "Man On The Flying Trapeze", "If I Had A Million" with a segment directed by Ernst Lubitsch, involving Charles Laughton, "Never Give A Sucker An Even Break" "Mississipi" and, of course "The Bank Dick". I didn't buy the set as it seemed pricey but, in February, Play.com came up with an almost half price offer and took several months to deliver it - from 'down under', I suspect. At the time, I opted for a Region 1 DVD with WC as Micawber in George Cukor's 1934 film of "David Copperfield" - compressed to 132 mins but by far the best version and a remarkable cast: Roland Young (Uriah Heep), Edna May Oliver (Aunt Betsy), Basil Rathbone (a horror as Mr Murdstone), Lionel Barrymore (Dan Peggotty) - a stalwart cast of Hollywood's best. Interesting that Hugh Walpole wrote the screenplay and appeared as The Vicar. But it was WC who used his elongated vowels and strong emphasis to memorably deliver all the Micawberisms. Confronting Heep and co. "In -the -aggregate, I judge you --to be - a highly distasteful collection" is quite inimitable. Almost as funny, in a different context as: "I went to Philadelphia---last week---and it was CL--O--S--ED!" My party piece for so many years.
|
|
« Last Edit: 22:59:26, 29-07-2008 by Stanley Stewart »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
George Garnett
|
|
« Reply #58 on: 22:29:55, 29-07-2008 » |
|
# 41 offbeat and # 44 AndyD Yes, I've also had to rack my brain re " WR Mysteries of the Organism" (1971) but it was directed by Dusan Makavejev and the controversy over its ban in Yugoslavia gave it a notoreity which made it a huge international hit. The word allegorical comes to mind but I'm quite vague after that. Those who have seen it must surely remember the Plaster of Paris scene? My companion and I bought a bag on the way home with a view to experimenting. (Reader, I married her.) I thought the film was a brilliantly funny if rather cruel debunking of poor Wilhelm Reich's bonkers ideas (the Orgone Box?) but I was firmly told by a WR enthusiast that it was just the opposite.
|
|
« Last Edit: 07:06:45, 30-07-2008 by George Garnett »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
offbeat
|
|
« Reply #59 on: 22:45:03, 29-07-2008 » |
|
Two directors of a rather controversial reputation i like are Michael Haneke and Roman Polanski Haneke's Funny Games is a seriously nasty film but with real impact and remember seeing Polanski's Repulsion in the cinema in which Catherine Deneuve plays this very disturbed girl - powerful film and great performance by Deneuve
To Stanley thank you very very much for telling my about that w c fields film offer - i only have few of his films on video and this looks an excellent collection with some films i have never seen before - thanks again !!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|