Janthefan
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: 13:06:00, 24-08-2007 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Live simply that all may simply live
|
|
|
Kittybriton
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: 14:22:07, 24-08-2007 » |
|
Specially for Jan - one of my favorites by the PRB  They always give me the feeling that when I'm not looking, they're moving.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Click me -> About meor me -> my handmade storeNo, I'm not a complete idiot. I'm only a halfwit. In fact I'm actually a catfish.
|
|
|
Mary Chambers
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: 14:25:37, 24-08-2007 » |
|
How about Ophelia by Millais? (She hasn't appeared yet, has she?) 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ian Pace
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: 14:31:04, 24-08-2007 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
|
|
|
Ian Pace
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: 14:32:43, 24-08-2007 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
|
|
|
Ian Pace
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: 14:36:56, 24-08-2007 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
|
|
|
Tony Watson
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: 14:40:55, 24-08-2007 » |
|
For all you fellow fans of The Family from One End Street, here's Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose by Sargent (not Sir Malcolm). 
|
|
« Last Edit: 20:28:01, 24-08-2007 by Tony Watson »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
George Garnett
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: 14:45:41, 24-08-2007 » |
|
 Gwen John: The Letter One of the incidental things I like about it is that it has two titles and you see it slightly differently depending on which is used. It was originally called 'The Letter' but Gwen John later changed the title to 'The Convalescent'. It changes it, doesn't it?
|
|
« Last Edit: 19:21:33, 24-08-2007 by George Garnett »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Janthefan
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: 15:09:36, 24-08-2007 » |
|
This is Penzance, it doesn't look much different even now.....except it is sunny today.  The Rain it Raineth Every Day - Norman Garstin
|
|
|
Logged
|
Live simply that all may simply live
|
|
|
Chafing Dish
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: 15:13:31, 24-08-2007 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
time_is_now
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: 15:28:30, 24-08-2007 » |
|
One of the incidental things I like about it is that it has two titles and you see it slightly differently depending on which is used. It was originally called 'The Letter' but Gwen John later changed the title to 'The Convalescent'. It changes it, doesn't it?
A bit like 8'27" (or whatever it was) vs. Threnody: For the Victims of Hiroshima?
|
|
|
Logged
|
The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
|
|
|
Mary Chambers
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: 18:57:40, 24-08-2007 » |
|
Tony #36 I can't see it. The fact that Mr and Mrs Ruggles were in the Tate is an interesting commentary on something or other. " It showed two children among the flowers at dusk engaged in hanging up Japanese lanterns.
"Lovely" to Rosie's way of thinking, and "That Real"." I've still got the book  .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TimR-J
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: 19:11:51, 24-08-2007 » |
|
We've already had two of my favourites, Mondrian (love, love, love Mondrian) and Newman, so here's another - Roy Lichtenstein, a much more interesting painter than just the blown-up cartoons: 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mary Chambers
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: 20:24:17, 24-08-2007 » |
|
Woman reading a letter by Pieter de Hooch 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tony Watson
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: 20:29:33, 24-08-2007 » |
|
Tony #36 I can't see it. The fact that Mr and Mrs Ruggles were in the Tate is an interesting commentary on something or other. " It showed two children among the flowers at dusk engaged in hanging up Japanese lanterns.
"Lovely" to Rosie's way of thinking, and "That Real"." I've still got the book  . How odd that it should disappear like that, Mary. I've tried a different link and hope that that doesn't perish.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|