The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:57:15, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Valentyn Sylvestreff - any good?  (Read 234 times)
Sydney Grew
Guest
« on: 12:56:17, 03-06-2007 »

We are in two minds about the music of Valentyn Sylvestreff, a native of Kyïff.

PRO
- he has written six symphonies, several sonatas, and two string quartets
- he writes a lot of pleasant-sounding chords for brass instruments

CONTRA
- his music is always too slow
- it is almost always too monotonous too
- he is the author of "Postludium DSCH"
- he is said to have a love of percussion (but perhaps that was only in his early years)

We know only a few works of his. The Fifth Symphony sounds like a pastiche or after-glow of the famous slow movement in Mahler's Fifth.

The Sixth Symphony is much the same! except that for Mahler is substituted Wagner.

His Meta-music is in very much the same style yet again, except that the piano here takes mainly the place of the strings.

Meta-waltz too sounds very similar to our ears! It is so slow all the way through.

In general Sylvestreff's style consists of a slow succession (and sometimes progression) of traditional harmonies (and snatches of melodies) on the brass and strings, and each slow step is followed or decorated by either a surely quite random flourish on the wood-wind, or an arpeggio (usually rising) on the harp. (He can't be using up the rest of the twelve notes each time, can he?) And that is just about it over the course of the entire work. His music is much more self-similar than Messiaen's, even!

What do the other Members think?
Logged
eruanto
Guest
« Reply #1 on: 13:05:08, 03-06-2007 »

I once caught a choral work by him on Late Junction. I can't for the life of me remember what it was called, but I really liked it. Very profundo.

I can't get on with what I've heard of his other music (not that I've heard very much at all)



ahem. posters of more substantial posts, where be you a-hoiding?
« Last Edit: 20:35:29, 03-06-2007 by eruanto » Logged
offbeat
****
Posts: 270



« Reply #2 on: 22:29:07, 04-06-2007 »

The only work i know is the fifth symphony (out on Sony Classics)
Very static work with very little development - seems to be one droning pulse throughtout the whole work with a slightly nostalgic and serene theme - on the programme notes he says his idea was to freeze time and can see what he means - personally its the sort of work to listen to at the end of a long day and just let it drift over you - would be interested to hear more  Smiley
Logged
pim_derks
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1518



« Reply #3 on: 23:58:12, 04-06-2007 »

I can't talk about Silvestrov's music (especially his Fifth Symphony) in an objective way. I listened a lot to this piece (and to the Dedication) in a rather difficult period of my life. It meant a lot to me then and in a way it still does. The same is the case with Elgar's Cello Concerto. Sometimes my personal relationship with a piece makes it difficult to talk about the pure musical aspects.
Logged

"People hate anything well made. It gives them a guilty conscience." John Betjeman
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: