I organised a 24-hour long performance of "Vexations" in the mid-1980s for basically amateur players to raise money for a charitable purpose. Not many people came to listen, but I think we had a team of about 8 players, not all doing the same length of playing. As I had organised it i had to fill in the required number of hours, which I think came to five, which was not too bad an endurance test. I had also attended years earlier a performance in London given by one pianist (I cannot recall his name), but I stayed for only three hours. What does the initial instruction containing "840" actually mean, then, if not telling the performers the number of repeats?
I'm a bit surprised you managed to organise a performance without apparently understanding the "instruction" ! It translates as follows - "[In order] to play this phrase [motif] 840 times in a row, it will be as well to prepare oneself in advance, and in the deepest silence, through serious immobilities [implying contemplation or meditation]". Orledge's article notes that "Satie's performance indications have been the subject of much speculation" and that his "performance note is not a definite instruction but, rather, a suggestion that
if one wants to play this phrase 840 times in a row . . ." Nevertheless, the implication is that there should be a fair number of repetitions.
Orledge's article is of great interest. I posted a link to it in message 1; also a link to the Bryars article about performances, which reveals that the solo version you heard was probably that by Richard Toop.
Incidentally, there is a full CD of
Vexations by Alan Marks (70 minutes - 40 repetitions) - not bad despite the odd mistake and the performer's suspect internal clock.
http://www.amazon.com/Vexations-Erik-Satie/dp/B000AM1TTE