I would be very interested in mounting a (serious) performance of Vexations - I can't begin to imagine what the effect on a listener (or performer) would be but Jonathan Kramer made some interesting points in The Time of Music which have been anecdotally confirmed by friends who HAVE taken part in performances in the 70s, and make me more than curious to experience for myself.
It's a rewarding experience ! I've not found it boring to either listen to or to play.
Because of the nature of the piece, it seems to me that there are a number of things to consider for starters -
Speed. Crucial if the piece is to be played 840 times. What does Satie mean by
Tres lent ? What would
Very slow mean to a 19th century musician ? Would it signify something different from what it does today ? Are there other pieces by Satie which bear any similarity in date, style and general character ? (Yes,
Danses gothiques in particular).
If played 840 times
Quaver = 78 = 80 seconds per repetition = 18 hours 40 minutes total
= 60 = 94 = 24 16
= 63 = = 23 6 and 40 secs
= 52 = 120 = 28
= 104 = 60 = 14
1 repetition being bass theme + harmonisation 1 + bass theme + harmonisation 2
Ce motif. What does Satie mean by this ? 1 repetition as described above. In his sketchbooks a
motif is a short musical cell.
1 repetition could = 4 motifs . . .
Should each repetition be as identical as possible ? (Certainly, in the context of this and Satie's other music of the 1890s). Dynamics ?
etc.
I've read a lot of material pertaining to
Vexations, but not Jonathan Kramer's. What points does he make ?