The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:44:48, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Solti's Mahler  (Read 149 times)
Swan_Knight
Temporary Restriction
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 428



« on: 11:59:22, 07-06-2008 »

Sir G.S. conducted and recorded the complete works of this composer and was a significant force in the 'Mahler boom' of the 60s...yet he rarely seems to be given a place at the 'top table' of Mahler interpreters.  His interpretations are generally considered 'too extrovert'.

I'm no convinced Mahlerphile, but I usually enjoy Solti's recordings...I still think his recording of the 8th symphony is unchallenged and his 80s digital version of the 'Titan' with the CSO is similarly excellent. Currently I'm getting to know his LSO 2nd from 1966. 

He always benefited from superb Decca sound, which it's difficult not to be influenced by.

Personally, I'll always take Klemperer over any other Mahler interpreter (even Bruno Walter), but I rate Solti highly in this repertoire. What do others think?
Logged

...so flatterten lachend die Locken....
Robert Dahm
***
Posts: 197


« Reply #1 on: 14:24:20, 07-06-2008 »

Mahler is one of those composers for whom interpretation changes meaning so radically that it becomes kind of meaningless to talk about 'quality' in the absolute and quantitative way that some people often do. (Actually, talking about quality quantitatively is always inappropriate, but there degrees, y'know?).

The only Solti Mahler I'm familiar with is the CSO box on Decca, which I really just can't stand. The 8th is certainly the pick of that bunch, but in some ways I suspect that this is because the sheer hugeness of it makes it somewhat 'conductor-proof'. The more subtle symphonies (which, my mind, are 3, 7 and 9) are really quite messy and inarticulate, I think. 5 and 6, as well, although the musical argument holds up somewhat better.

My own favourite complete cycle, though, is the Gary Bertini, which I understand is similarly controversial, so I can't really talk... Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: