Indeed I am, Mrs. Kerfoops - I have on CD 2 of his piano concerti (nos. 1 and 3), his 2nd Symphony, an overture and a Symphonic piece plus the Op.100 Preludes and Fugues for piano duet. The latter really are superb - much better than academic sounding preludes and fugues written by some composers. The Piano Concerti i've not heard for a while but if i remember correctly, they really are very good nicely orchestrated with some memorable tunes. The 2nd symphony is not quite so inspired and includes an organ part (IIRC, he wrote 8 in total). He is on my list of composers that I would like to hear more of by getting more CDs. Sterling is the label that recorded all the symphonies, the piano concerti and some other odds and ends for anyone that is interested.
Many thanks to Member Jonathan for that interesting summary. I shall certainly be "on the look-out" for the
opus 100 Preludes and Fugues.
In fact the third
piano-forte concerto sounds nothing like Brahms at all - much more like a somewhat unadventurous Liszt. It is in four movements the first of which being, unusually, a
passacaglia upon the main theme of the
finale and the second a fine
scherzo sort of thing. The whole makes pleasant enough listening, although it is much to be regretted that there is not more chromaticism - even Mozart in his day was able to do a good deal better in that department. Indeed at just a couple of spots we feel the harmonic structure to be amateurish and if we are not mistaken even downright wrong.
Grove's
New Dictionary tells us that Huber was very popular in Switzerland because of his sunny disposition, but it omits the date of this third
concerto! From other sources we glean that it was in fact first performed in 1899.