The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:37:47, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 43
  Print  
Author Topic: who was Shostakovich?  (Read 25287 times)
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #105 on: 18:02:29, 08-04-2007 »

Shostakovich wasn't religious, and he'd be just about the last composer I would imagine using numerological techniques. but I think Ron's right about the importance of semitonal shifts in various contexts, not just in terms of intervals but also with entire harmonic objects (chords, cadences etc.), and often with a "disruptive" intention, as for example at the very beginning of 4/iii, where the "expected" (and indeed in a way "heard") alternating fourth in the bass is replaced by a tritone.
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #106 on: 18:12:05, 08-04-2007 »

I don't know his symphonies that well. I know them ofcourse (some of them better than others), but not as well as I would if I played them.
The last piece of his I played was cello sonata. I lookied through his viola sonata (that is his last piece).
May be it became almost standard for composers to replace four with augmented fourth. It is our attempt at harmony and perfection failed. From his music it is clear that he found outside world is intrusive and he loved his inner world and would not let anyone inside.
Logged
ahinton
*****
Posts: 1543


WWW
« Reply #107 on: 19:03:34, 08-04-2007 »

In the case of Sorabji, almost all the positive material I've ever read on him invokes his cranky and dangerous ideas
That fact wouldn't be down to selective reading, would it? And what, in any case, are these "cranky and dangerous ideas" (for the benefit of readers here)...

when I invoke those when arguing a rather more negative interpretation, I don't see why it is any different. But I don't think one needs to know those ideas to arrive at some notion of the world-view presented from the music alone.
I'm afraid that I don't really get this. Anyone who has read and heard nothing of Wagner's anti-Semitic (I nearly wrote anti-semiotic by mistake!) writings is unlikely to tune into this as part of a Wagnerian world-view when at a production of Tristan und Isolde; likewise, I do not see why anyone would pick up the kinds of resonance to which you refer in the Sorabjian context (without naming any of them as such) just by listening to Sorabji's Gulistan, his settings of Verlaine, Mallarmé and Baudelaire or his Fourth Piano Sonata.

But at this point I need to ask you something I've meant to for a while: in one of your essays in Rapoport's book, you say something about Sorabji's adhering to racial theories (I don't have the exact quote in front of me) but then have nothing critical to say about this. Don't you find such things at all disturbing?
You'll need to be more specific here if I am to answer your question more directly; in the meantime, what I will say is that, whatever his racial theories may or may not have been, he never paraded them in his music, so they are not present in his scores to be identified by listeners or musicologists - so I return to your own argument that, just as in the case of Shostakovich, the music is more important than the man.

Now I do think that further discussion of this ought to be transferred to the Sorabji thread, otherwise some of those who rightly wish to discuss Shostakovich here might get abit annoyed!

Best,

Alistair
« Last Edit: 19:07:50, 08-04-2007 by ahinton » Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #108 on: 19:19:21, 08-04-2007 »

In the case of Sorabji, almost all the positive material I've ever read on him invokes his cranky and dangerous ideas
That fact wouldn't be down to selective reading, would it? And what, in any case, are these "cranky and dangerous ideas" (for the benefit of readers here)...

Those have been discussed in several other threads previously; I don't particularly want to run over the same territory again.

Quote
when I invoke those when arguing a rather more negative interpretation, I don't see why it is any different. But I don't think one needs to know those ideas to arrive at some notion of the world-view presented from the music alone.
I'm afraid that I don't really get this. Anyone who has read and heard nothing of Wagner's anti-Semitic (I nearly wrote anti-semiotic by mistake!) writings is unlikely to tune into this as part of a Wagnerian world-view when at a production of Tristan und Isolde;

Maybe not in that opera, but in Die Meistersinger or Siegfried audiences in Wagner's own time, at least, may well have picked up the anti-semitic cliches, well-known as such, that at least arguably informed the characterisations of Beckmesser and Mime.

Quote
likewise, I do not see why anyone would pick up the kinds of resonance to which you refer in the Sorabjian context (without naming any of them as such) just by listening to Sorabji's Gulistan, his settings of Verlaine, Mallarmé and Baudelaire or his Fourth Piano Sonata.

Again, I have been through that before (and I picked up on those elements before I'd read any of the writings - the writings confirmed what I heard in the music, rather than vice versa); very quickly, to do with the contrived mysticism, the elimination of the individualised subject and all forms of personalised emotion; essentially the eschewal of all human elements from music. In terms of settings of Verlaine, Mallarmé and Baudelaire, you might want to consider some of the ideologies at play in their work as well.

But at this point I need to ask you something I've meant to for a while: in one of your essays in Rapoport's book, you say something about Sorabji's adhering to racial theories (I don't have the exact quote in front of me) but then have nothing critical to say about this. Don't you find such things at all disturbing?
You'll need to be more specific here if I am to answer your question more directly[/quote]

I'll have to find the exact quote again when I'm next in a library. I will do so.

Quote
in the meantime, what I will say is that, whatever his racial theories may or may not have been, he never paraded them in his music, so they are not present in his scores to be identified by listeners or musicologists

Whether or not it is possible to parade racial theories in music (and, come on, you know exactly what I'm referring to here in terms of his ideas) is an interesting question; certainly I can't imagine one could thoroughly deny that nationalistic ideologies can be expressed in musical terms, nor that much music is often heard in such a way.

Quote
- so I return to your own argument that, just as in the case of Shostakovich, the music is more important than the man.

Well, you and other Sorabji-ites seem extremely interested in the man, and in his ideas. Are we going to see those left alone in subsequent writings on Sorabji's work?

Quote
Now I do think that further discussion of this ought to be transferred to the Sorabji thread, otherwise some of those who rightly wish to discuss Shostakovich here might get abit annoyed!

Indeed; I will copy this message there.
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #109 on: 09:58:00, 09-04-2007 »

Thanks, guys, for creating a separate Sorabji thread. Perhaps, if it's not too much trouble, once you've been able to copy the posts across you might like to delete them from here, leaving just a link instead : that would make this thread easier to follow. Thanks.

At some point while stripping a 10 x 16 wall of woodchip (a horrendous job which took three Shostakovich symphonies, 4,6 and 7, even with the aid of a steamer) I'm pretty sure I found a point in 4 where there's a phrase based on two fourths a tone apart, but could stop to note exactly where. Since I'll be doing the facing wall today, I'll have another try and see if I can note it down.

Returning to semitone shifts for a moment, the last couple of pages of 4 i contains some interesting examples (23:00/Bar 1003 [3 before fig. 103]); not only does the solo violin have a repeated keening phrase (Bbb - Ab), but the lower strings' and harps' accompanying chord also slides down a semitone (before going down a further tone, the three chords together probably recalling the three which opened the work). At (23:58/Bar 1018) two of the horns have a strange, unsettling low semitone clash of Db and C which underpins the bassoon's originally jaunty version of the opening march for 3 1/2 bars, and then (24:40/Bar 1027) under the cor anglais' repeated fourths G-G-D-D, etc, the trombones and tubas slide down a semitone from a Db minor triad to a C minor. In the brief flare of colour which ignites seconds later, the string figures are built up from fourths sliding down seven semitones from the divisi firsts, starting on E and A, while the seconds (similarly divided) do the same but with an interlocking augmented fourth of C sharp and G, forming between them chromatically descending major sevenths. The violas and celli start on the same divided chord two octaves lower, but move up seven semitones chromatically. Semitone shifts of perfect fourths and augmented fourths simultaneously, very precisely notated, in a situation where they're hardly to be heard clearly: I'd suggest that the reason for their particular choice makes sense if the fourths both perfect and augmented plus the concomitant semitones from the original sketch are still in the composer's mind.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #110 on: 10:10:31, 10-04-2007 »

That phrase founded on consecutive fourths a tone apart wasn't my in imagination, although I'll admit it does include one extra note used as a passing note.

It's the cell first heard at 08:24/Bar 307/5 before [34] in the first violins: a dotted crochet Eb followed by semiquavers F - Eb - F - D - C - Bb, which reappears prominently in modified form (C, D - C - D - B - D - A - G) twice on the oboes, clarinets, horns and violins before being repeated twice further, a tone lower, immediately after by bass clarinet, bassoon, the trombones and cellos as one of the two major components of the big climax at 11:31/Bar 436/[47].

It also occurs twice at the climax of the cor anglais solo towards the end of the same movement, too (21:24/Bar 965/3 after [98]); firstly as Gb, Ab - Gb - Ab - F - Eb - Db, then as D - C - D - B - D - A - G, which, incidentally, just happens to be an augmented fourth lower......
« Last Edit: 10:23:40, 10-04-2007 by Ron Dough » Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #111 on: 10:14:08, 10-04-2007 »

Hmmm... my score doesn't have bar numbers. You wouldn't be so kind as to add some kind of orientation around rehearsal numbers would you? Otherwise I'd better start counting...
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #112 on: 10:34:20, 10-04-2007 »

Rehearsal numbers in green for Richard...

Incidentally, on the subject of Mravinsky's recorded output of the Shostakovich symphonies, the reason why there was never a recording of the 13th or 14th (and presumably also the 4th) is quite revealing, and provides further evidence against those who consider that the composer was some sort of favoured darling of the state. Mravinsky's wife was quite a high-ranking party official, and for this reason he refused to be involved with any of Shostakovich's works which were considered risky or unacceptable. Kondrashin, on the other hand, had no such qualms.....
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #113 on: 11:56:38, 10-04-2007 »

Thanks Ron, what a service!!!

Yes, that's an important motive in a number of ways. In its form at figure 47 it exemplifies a kind of melodic shape Shostakovich was to reuse throughout his subsequent oeuvre: a back-and-forth movement in (usually) semiquavers where the interval between the upper and lower pitches gradually expands. Here (and at the related point one bar after figure 243 in the third movement!) the upper pitch remains the same while the lower one falls. Often in later works the upper pitch rises as well, creating a "wedge" shape.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #114 on: 12:08:18, 10-04-2007 »

When I get several moments I'll add rehearsal figures throughout, r. But at the moment we've a minor crisis; one of Junior's pals has lost the van keys, which might have happened in my car, or possibly the house (where they're all staying whilst working). Every five minutes I'm getting frantic calls asking me to check increasingly unlikely places....
Logged
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #115 on: 18:39:55, 11-04-2007 »

Just a note that the Edward Seckerson review of the Melodiya Kondrashin set looks likely for this Saturday after last week's false start:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/cdreview/pip/fjrvm/
Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #116 on: 09:57:34, 13-04-2007 »

More on the Fourth Symphony...

Having already mentioned the fourths, perfect and augmented, as well as the semitone implicit in the C - F - Db - Gb cell, just a quick thought about the thirds. Within any perfect triad there will always be one major and one minor third, major at the base with a minor on top for a major triad, and the opposite way round for a minor. The implied position of the third within a triad will decide whether it's to be a minor or major.

Although the cell implies a major third, the dominant C minor nature of the eventual fourth symphony means that it's the minor rather than the major third which becomes a major building block. I've already mentioned its use as the halting bass line below the bassoon's theme in the first movement (07:18/ Bar 261/ fig. [31]), but bearing in mind my present interest in the use of cells made up from an identical interval semitones or tones apart, there’s a cell of minor thirds which turns up in the middle and last movements.

 In the middle movement, it occurs in a tone-apart variety at 03:36/ Bar 176 / 4 before [129] as the upper strings try to subvert the three-in-bar-feeling: E-E-E-Csharp, E-E-E-Csharp, D-B (and are the thrice-repeated notes a reminiscence or the all pervasive triplets from the first movement?), while in the last movement it’s the major material for a climactic sequence which begins just before the three minute mark (Bar 48/ 4 before [160]), where high strings, reinforced by most of the higher winds, settle after a lead-in climb of an augmented fifth into a semitone-apart pattern: three Abs and an F, followed by three Gs and an E, before climbing up in the same rhythmic pattern to a statement of the fourth, three Cs and a G, reinforced by the xylophone for incisive clarity over the brass, before subsiding downwards. These semitone-apart thirds make up the same shape as S-C-D-H, and a suggestion that this may not be accidental lies in the shape of the first phrase of the violin theme which grows over the dying four note rhythm C-D-C-Eb-Bb-Cb(=B)-Bb, which is another rearrangement of the DSCH shape in the 'right' key.

I’m becoming more and more convinced that despite its apparently rather undisciplined structure, Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony is bound together by a syntax of small rhythmic and motivic cells which are constantly informing the creation and development of the themes which make up all three movements, thus giving an internal logic to its musical progression even when its dramatic and emotional swings are at their most extreme.
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #117 on: 10:28:50, 13-04-2007 »

Quote
Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony is bound together by a syntax of small rhythmic and motivic cells which are constantly informing the creation and development of the themes which make up all three movements, thus giving an internal logic to its musical progression even when its dramatic and emotional swings are at their most extreme.
I'm sure that's right. In this as in other aspects it shows itself as a continuation and renewal of the kind of symphonic thinking developed by Mahler.
Logged
ahinton
*****
Posts: 1543


WWW
« Reply #118 on: 10:51:17, 13-04-2007 »

Quote
Shostakovich’s Fourth Symphony is bound together by a syntax of small rhythmic and motivic cells which are constantly informing the creation and development of the themes which make up all three movements, thus giving an internal logic to its musical progression even when its dramatic and emotional swings are at their most extreme.
I'm sure that's right. In this as in other aspects it shows itself as a continuation and renewal of the kind of symphonic thinking developed by Mahler.
Indeed so - and so much so, I think, that it is in this very symphony (arguably one of the composer's most fascinating and spectacular achievements, desipte its having been composed when still in his 20s) that Shostakovich comes as close to Mahler as anywhere in his symphonic output.

Best,

Alistair

Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #119 on: 08:38:03, 14-04-2007 »

I find it all but inconceivable that Shostakovich wasn't aware that it was a ground-breaking piece, and can't begin to understand just what making the decision to withdraw it must have cost him, especially right on top of the huge shock of having an already hugely popular opera vilified and banned. How he didn't just sink into complete depression shows great fortitude; this was, as has been pointed out above, a young composer not yet thirty who for ten years had been accepted and lauded (not just in his own country), and had previously been accorded important commissions and encouraged to experiment.

When we eventually return to the Fifth, it will be interesting to see not only just how much his symphonic path has changed from that of the Fourth, but also to try and pick up on the allusions back to it, some obvious, others perhaps rather hidden...
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 43
  Print  
 
Jump to: