The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
07:45:39, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Electronic music  (Read 1726 times)
richard barrett
Guest
« on: 23:00:34, 02-05-2007 »

Time_is_now asked for a thread about electronic music, so here it is. Where are we going to start the discussion? Well, he also mentioned Berio's Laborintus 2, which reminded me that in those days, up until quite recently, it was fairly usual for composers whose principal concern was instrumental/vocal music to make forays into the world of electronics, which back then involved complicated and expensive studios. Now that making electronic music is within the grasp of anyone with a computer, most of the present-day successors to the instrumental/vocal composers of the 1960s and 1970s seem to have little interest in such things. Is it that electronic music is somehow bound up with old-fashioned modernism, so that today's young fogeys wouldn't be seen dead doing it?

On the other hand, the use of electronics and computers in improvised music is constantly increasing. My feeling about this difference is that improvisational performance is more idiomatic to the medium than anything based on the model of composition of scores. Many if not most of the things that in earlier days required long and painstaking sojourns in a studio can now be done in real time. What's possibly most interesting to me about electronic music is the sense of discovery it creates, and if that sense of discovery can be taken onstage and enacted rather than its results being displayed, then this sense might be shared more fully with the audience. That at least is my conviction.

So I've had my little say to begin with. Anyone else?
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #1 on: 23:03:38, 02-05-2007 »

O.k, I'll say it first. This is just like buses.
Logged
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #2 on: 23:05:45, 02-05-2007 »

O.k, I'll say it first. This is just like buses.

Bryn, you mean those new electronic ones?  Roll Eyes
Logged

Green. Always green.
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #3 on: 23:24:24, 02-05-2007 »

Bryn, you've gone off topic on the SECOND post on a thread. Is that some kind of record?
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #4 on: 23:24:47, 02-05-2007 »

martle, do you want to repost your opening salvo in 'Electronic Composition' here, or should we have two threads?

Little thought, following on from Richard's thoughts about electronics being seen as tied up with modernism and as such unappealing to young fogeys - might electronic music suffer from something of an image problem, being seen as too geeky for fashion-conscious youngsters?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #5 on: 23:27:06, 02-05-2007 »

martle, do you want to repost your opening salvo in 'Electronic Composition' here, or should we have two threads?

Little thought, following on from Richard's thoughts about electronics being seen as tied up with modernism and as such unappealing to young fogeys - might electronic music suffer from something of an image problem, being seen as too geeky for fashion-conscious youngsters?

Seeing Richard's thread opener, I thought it was rather better than mine' so I deleted it. Otherwise, who knows WHERE we'd end up!

As you were, and back to buses.  Wink
Logged

Green. Always green.
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #6 on: 23:49:48, 02-05-2007 »

Well, looks like Martle's "Electronic Composition" thread has failed to pick up passengers so far, despite being the first along.
Logged
stuart macrae
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 547


ascolta


« Reply #7 on: 23:55:37, 02-05-2007 »

Little thought, following on from Richard's thoughts about electronics being seen as tied up with modernism and as such unappealing to young fogeys - might electronic music suffer from something of an image problem, being seen as too geeky for fashion-conscious youngsters?

If anything, quite the opposite seems to be the case. Many DJs (and they don't come much more fashion-conscious than that) branch out into live, improvised performance (so I'm told... Roll Eyes )

As Richard says, the technology can make it relatively easy these days...personally speaking, one of the problems I have now is that I don't know where to begin. Having been taught in the mid-90s from tape editing up to editing and processing in Logic, and mapping samplers, and then having no access to a studio or any decent computer equipment until a couple of years ago, I feel terribly out of touch with all the technology available now - in fact, perhaps I'm just too fogeyish and not fashion-conscious enough to have kept up!

However I have been dabbling at home and will have the chance to try out the results this month (although I've avoided live electronics as there was no budget to hire the expertise required to get that right...).

I'm hoping that someone will mention some good kit/software as it's very hard to know what's better than what etc.
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #8 on: 00:38:44, 03-05-2007 »

Little thought, following on from Richard's thoughts about electronics being seen as tied up with modernism and as such unappealing to young fogeys - might electronic music suffer from something of an image problem, being seen as too geeky for fashion-conscious youngsters?

If anything, quite the opposite seems to be the case. Many DJs (and they don't come much more fashion-conscious than that) branch out into live, improvised performance (so I'm told... Roll Eyes )
This is true, although here "live" means something different from the word as applied to performing instrumental/vocal music, involving something more like "intervention" in an ongoing pulse-based texture, more often than not using the Ableton Live software: the music carries on whether these interventions take place or not, but they serve to inject a certain more spontaneous element into the mix. My personal feeling is that live electronics could be more ambitious than this, and aspire to aproach the flexibility and fluency of acoustic instruments and voices.

Quote
the technology can make it relatively easy these days...personally speaking, one of the problems I have now is that I don't know where to begin. Having been taught in the mid-90s from tape editing up to editing and processing in Logic, and mapping samplers, and then having no access to a studio or any decent computer equipment until a couple of years ago, I feel terribly out of touch with all the technology available now - in fact, perhaps I'm just too fogeyish and not fashion-conscious enough to have kept up!
If you know how to do those things, Stuart, why not just use those? Those electronic pieces of the 50s and 60s which are still listened to now, despite being based on "primitive" and "outdated" technology, stand as witness that the composer's imagination and "sense of discovery" are infinitely more important than whether he or she is using state-of-the-art technology.

Quote
I'm hoping that someone will mention some good kit/software as it's very hard to know what's better than what etc.
Just try a few things out. There are some interesting bits of freeware like Soundhack and SPEAR which will enable you to do some interesting work on sounds (after which you can edit them in a program you already know). Many of those working seriously on live electronic music these days are constructing their own "instruments" - one way of doing this is using a program like Reaktor, which involves putting basic elements together in a similar kind of way to how things were done in the modular voltage-controlled studios of the 60s and 70s. A more sophisticated way would be to develop your ideas in a programming environment like MaxMSP or Supercollider, or the more expensive hardware-based system Kyma. (My own normal performance setup is a combination of MaxMSP programming and the sampling software LiSa.)

Today, however, I've been generating sound material using electric-guitar feedback. There are things computers just can't get right.
« Last Edit: 00:41:44, 03-05-2007 by richard barrett » Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #9 on: 12:17:59, 03-05-2007 »

Well this thread seem to have gone quiet for the moment, so here's something that popped into my mind when reading of the BCMG in another thread. Does anybody here know any details of how the BEAST went about creating their realization of Varèse's "Poème Électronique"?
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #10 on: 12:34:12, 03-05-2007 »

Oh, and not the BEAST, but I would remind folk of this
Logged
harmonyharmony
*****
Posts: 4080



WWW
« Reply #11 on: 22:42:25, 13-05-2007 »

I've got to that stage (actually I got there at around 5 o'clock today) where I'm worn out.
My eyes are strained, my back aches (I'm tending towards the Feldman school of chairs and desks - one is broken, the other is too low) and my brain is just not firing.
So I thought I'd pop my head in here.

My problem for a long time was that I had ideas for what I wanted to do with electronics, but the level that I had been taught was designed to deal with a very specific model of electroacoustic composition, and not one that really interested me.
In order to do the things that I wanted to do, I would have had to invest some serious time and some serious money.
Also, electronic studios in most universities are often not the nicest places in the world. They tend to be either stuffy or freezing, have very little daylight, have strip lighting and magnolia walls (yum), have regulations that prevent you from drinking or eating, and an aggressively subscribed sign-up sheet. All of this meant that I ended up uncomfortable, SAD and dehydrated with the start of a migraine. I think that you need to be comfortable with the studio, just like you are with an instrument.

Now I'm a little bit older and more experienced, I'm much more comfortable in a studio. I ignore the rules about not drinking, take regular five minute breaks outside, use the studio outside of deadlines (even better outside of terms), and take down the lights when they start to flicker. I also have MaxMSP and ProTools on my laptop and have discovered just how much you can achieve simply by playing around with the software.

Where am I going with this? I've started using MaxMSP to improvise with, but it's also pushed me further towards a 'disposable music'. I remember Nigel Osborne talking about how we shouldn't worry so much about posterity; that we should just write the music and that maybe the music of today is 'disposable', rather like a temporary path through a jungle: we're still getting somewhere but it doesn't really matter how we got there. When I produce a score, I spend an awful lot of man-hours getting it to sound and look right. With today's technology, you can produce a beautiful (or ugly) piece in half the time. I've started to use electronics for improvisation but also to construct 'support systems' for solo instruments. I want to start producing some 'fixed' electronic pieces next that are deliberately 'disposable' and flawed.

If young composers see electronics as being geeky, that's partly down to how it's presented. We have these university studios, curated often by (erm, not sure how they'd feel about being called this) geeks. In this country, there is a tendency in composition teaching towards 'professional practice', and this tends to be rather geared towards producing dots on the page, a consistent flow of satisfactory dots, exhibiting secure technique. This steers composers away from risks and learning something new. The exciting and terrifying thing about today's technology is that so much is possible and that any idea of a repertoire has to be redefined on a really broad canvas to make any sense. The improvisation scene has lots of exciting young performers making some exciting noises, and this is why young composers are drawn to it.
If young electronic composers had a launchpad - a space devoted to performance of electronic music, improvised and fixed - airy, well-lit studio spaces that composers could book for weeks - I think that we'd be in a very different situation.
Logged

'is this all we can do?'
anonymous student of the University of Berkeley, California quoted in H. Draper, 'The new student revolt' (New York: Grove Press, 1965)
http://www.myspace.com/itensemble
harmonyharmony
*****
Posts: 4080



WWW
« Reply #12 on: 22:44:50, 13-05-2007 »

Does anybody here know any details of how the BEAST went about creating their realization of Varèse's "Poème Électronique"?
No, but I've been meaning to get around to reading Michael Clarke's article on how to make Kontakte for live performance, ever since I heard him explain some of his ideas a few years ago.
Logged

'is this all we can do?'
anonymous student of the University of Berkeley, California quoted in H. Draper, 'The new student revolt' (New York: Grove Press, 1965)
http://www.myspace.com/itensemble
supermarket_sweep
*
Posts: 45



« Reply #13 on: 00:42:07, 11-07-2007 »

Mm, interesting thread. I have virtually no real experience with electronics, though I have been fiddling around on my computer for a couple of years with a programme called Goldwave, and, more recently, Audacity. On one occassion, I took my laptop to a free improv jam session and attempted to contribute, but, though some of the sounds I managed to produce (mainly through looping pre-exisiting tracks and recordings of what the other musicians were playing, then playing with volume levels) were quite interesting, overall I didn't really feel I was making much of an impact - these were pretty disposable sounds whose absence wouldn't have been noticed. However, I would be very interested to learn more and develop some skills: the problem is, I don't really have access to any materials and don't know where to start. For a start, I have a laptop running Windows rather than a Mac, and have no access to any studios, that I know of, at least. Possibly there is some stuff going on as regards this in Cambridge, where I'm studying a university course, but I'm home for the summer now which makes that not feasible for now. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to proceed?
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #14 on: 16:41:16, 12-07-2007 »

If you're stuck with Windows you might like to give this a try: http://www.composersdesktop.com/index.html

Hmmm... I see it's also available for Mac OSX now. This is turning out to be a VERY expensive reply.

Native Instruments' REAKTOR is optimised for Windows and can do some amazing things with a little patience. Their software sampler KONTAKT might also be worth investigating for live performance work, as might Ableton LIVE which is rather heavily oriented towards beat- and loop-related uses but has an impressive array of controllable parameters and so could probably be built into a flexible instrument for improvisation. MaxMSP is available for Windows as well as Mac OS if you're interested in a more do-it-yourself approach.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to: