The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
15:37:58, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 118 119 [120] 121 122 ... 267
  Print  
Author Topic: one to a million!  (Read 54129 times)
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #1785 on: 10:11:37, 04-07-2007 »

If it's any help, A, I always look on Wiki first to see if there's anything interesting for each particular year: if there is and I can find a relevant image with a number as well, then I use it: if not, then I'd still rather see something relevant from the date (such as Baz's Tallis page) than spanners etc., which for me at least are a desperate last port of call. If you quote CD's message with the map, you'll see that the reference for the picture includes the date 1577, whereas your 15.79 doesn't. And 15 what 79, anyway?
 Wink
Logged
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #1786 on: 10:12:39, 04-07-2007 »

So, I see that the having a number on the picture has just disappeared, I can now use the pictures I have of sort of anything and put a date on.... would that be ok? or just the time I took them....?
I am confused Undecided Undecided
Oh, don't be a neomaxizoomdweebie.



Logged
A
*****
Posts: 4808



« Reply #1787 on: 10:19:56, 04-07-2007 »

I also refer to all these sorts of pages but where we differ is that if I can't find anything interesting with a number on I find something uninteresting with a number on.... I thought ( stupidly obviously) that that was what we were supposed to be doing .

Sor-ry
A
Logged

Well, there you are.
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #1788 on: 10:23:02, 04-07-2007 »

Actually, if you look back at the beginning of the thread, the pictures thing only started kicking in at about message 17 - and no rules were ever suggested I think. So I reckon anything goes, as long as you 'express' a number...

God I'm helpful.  Smiley
Logged

Green. Always green.
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #1789 on: 10:27:27, 04-07-2007 »

Actually, if you look back at the beginning of the thread, the pictures thing only started kicking in at about message 17 - and no rules were ever suggested I think. So I reckon anything goes, as long as you 'express' a number...

God I'm helpful.  Smiley
helpful enough, at least. I don't think the rules need to be any tighter than that!

Now, where were we?

February 24, 1582: conversion to the Gregorian calendar.
Logged
Baziron
Guest
« Reply #1790 on: 10:28:47, 04-07-2007 »



Frescobaldi - born 1583
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #1791 on: 10:36:01, 04-07-2007 »

I assume that invisible picture is the Bard.

Hm, don't know what happened there. When I posted it, it was not only visible but downright enormous. Indeed sometimes when I look at your post, Mary, it's enormous there as well. And then sometimes he disappears. Analogous in a way to the sense of authorial presence itself in the Bard's work, I suppose. But somehow much more annoying.

I've replaced it with a slightly less enormous but hopefully more stable Bard.

A, the way I see it (just me personally although a few of us seem to be playing it a bit this way) is that the number is the destination and I try to think of an interesting way to get there. So if some great event happened that year then wonderful, even better if there's a picture of that event with the year on it. But after there have been too many of those then that gets a bit boring so something from the auction site brings welcome relief. Or even just something mathematical about the number.

It's a bit like Mornington Crescent.

Oo look, bus 1584 being driven by Satan.

Logged
A
*****
Posts: 4808



« Reply #1792 on: 10:38:18, 04-07-2007 »



1585. Tallis
Logged

Well, there you are.
Baziron
Guest
« Reply #1793 on: 10:43:22, 04-07-2007 »



1585. Tallis

You mean he DIED in 1585? (The page comes from 1575.)

Baz
Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #1794 on: 10:45:01, 04-07-2007 »

Here's a 1585 for t-p  Wink

Logged
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #1795 on: 10:57:11, 04-07-2007 »

Normally I would reduce this, but it isn't the same.

Logged
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #1796 on: 11:03:43, 04-07-2007 »

1571 is the only known prime of form (p!/p# + 1)/p.

CD, what function does the # symbol represent?  Is there a theorem / hypothesis yet which states 1571 is the only prime of that form?  or disprove it?

Anyway....



Tommo
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
George Garnett
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3855



« Reply #1797 on: 11:06:43, 04-07-2007 »

Logged
Janthefan
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 812



« Reply #1798 on: 11:08:15, 04-07-2007 »

Logged

Live simply that all may simply live
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #1799 on: 11:13:07, 04-07-2007 »

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 118 119 [120] 121 122 ... 267
  Print  
 
Jump to: