but it's so much cheaper to make programmes in which someone's front room is redecorated
Quite so. Someone discovered at a certain point that you don't need to spend all that money in order to keep people watching, and in fact I believe that programmes like
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire and
Big Brother actually pay for themselves because of their premium phone-in features. Another way of putting this amazing discovery would be, as I've no doubt said
ad nauseam on these boards, that if you treat people like idiots they will eventually start behaving like idiots. Plus there are so many channels to fill with "content" that the wishes of people who prefer the TV of the 1970s can be "satisfied" by their being fed exactly that.
I might hypothesize that one of the reasons that such programming isn't as prevalent today as it was in times past is that people don't *have* to watch television. You say there's not much that interests you on TV so you turn off. Plenty people are more-or-less okay with what's on, but the people who might actually effect change are just, like, "bugger that; I'd be better off reading a book anyway". Also I would imagine that the very function of television viewing has changed considerably towards being a form of light entertainment as opposed to a force to be taken more seriously.
(I'm happy I brought this up; downloading a few of the series mentioned now).