The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
16:38:10, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: A small grammatical point - possessives in English  (Read 308 times)
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #15 on: 01:24:42, 25-08-2008 »

We certainly have autoharp, at considerable length.

You say it's potato's and I say its potatoes
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #16 on: 15:00:08, 25-08-2008 »

That was only about plural possessives though, wasn't it? Now we're talking about the possessives of singular nouns ending in "s".

I must admit I don't really have a 'rule' for when to add an extra s and when just to leave an apostrophe. My practice varies with different words.


"Practice varies widely in for conscience' sake and for goodness' sake, and the use of an apostrophe in them must be regarded as optional" The New Fowler's Modern English Usage, ed. Burchfield, RW, 3rd edition, 1996, entry for "sake", p. 686.
I think that's talking about whether to write "goodness' sake" or "goodness sake", though, isn't it? Not "goodness's sake" (which just seems odd, given that in that phrase you don't pronounce the extra "s" at all).
Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #17 on: 15:30:09, 25-08-2008 »

Actually one of the worst grammatical mistakes it is possible to make is to consult Fowler in the first place. He was a child of the "jazz" age, a popularizer and simplifier, very unreliable on the finer points. Has any one noticed how fond "business" people are of his naïve pages?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to: