The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
01:42:33, 03-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ID3 tag alternatives?  (Read 252 times)
grahamwebb2000
*
Posts: 10


« on: 22:33:44, 03-08-2008 »

I have posted this question on other forums with no luck, please tell me someone here has solved this problem! Namely sorting MP3 files by folder and file rather than the primitive ID3 tag method. 


For example: My MP3 music collection on the PC is over 200GB and sorted in the folders I have chosen, I select the files I want to hear directly and queue them onto the Windows Media Player (WMP) playlist. The files are sorted firstly by genre: audiobooks, blues, classical, pop, rock, punk, jazz, and then for most, by artist and album. The classical folder is the largest and since the music spans 2000 years I have labelled the files chronologically by composer, using the mid-date of the composers life as a file name, for example:

1854 Smetana
1857 Verdi
1860 Bruckner
1860 Mussorgsky etc

Then within the "1718 Bach JS" folder for example, there are folders for each album:

Bach - Brandenburg Concertos
Bach - Goldberg Variations
Bach - Matthaus Passion Disk 1
Bach - Matthaus Passion Disk 2

This is very important because my recording of the Mathew Passion for example, is made up of about 90 MP3 files each about 1 minute long with repeating names (Aria, Chorus, Recitative, Chorus, Aria .. etc). Strip that labelling away as itunes and WMP do and we lose the order and the track gap timing - absolutely useless. Sometime even selecting the folder and clicking "play in WMP" is a waste of time because WMP re-orders the files! Heathens!

I then put compilations into one of 8 folders according to the muscial age, please correct my dates, they are roughly:

-1100 Early Medieval Music
1150-1300 High Medieval Music
1450 Late Medieval Music
1600 Renaissance Collections
1750 Baroque Collections
1820 Classical Collections
1900 Romantic Collections
2000 Modern Collections

Can anyone suggest a better way to organise this collection using ID3 tags? And a realistic way for me to implement their idea with over 4000 albums, because it took me a year to copy the collection onto hard disk, the vinyll and CDs are now in storage and I find I listen much less, simply because the ID3 tagging system has made it inaccessible. No thanks to the ID3 community for their very simplistic view of music. I expect those here copying music onto disk are facing this problem, or will be.
Logged
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #1 on: 23:01:55, 03-08-2008 »

Once you've settled on a filing format, making any changes is difficult - it involves a lot of retrospective work.  Having said that, and recognising that such things are a matter of personal taste, your filing system did strike me as being a bit complicated!

I am pernickety about the way I file my music, especially the more than 8000 tracks sitting on my iPod, and the (slightly smaller) amount on my hard disk, which I file using iTunes.  The key is to impose your ID3 own filing system, stick to it religiously, and not to be seduced by the capital-letter strewn offerings of Gracenote (which is good for saving you a bit of typing, but not much else), and not to worry overly about what folders your tracks are stored in on the hard disc - get the ID3 tags right and it doesn't matter.

The format I use is to turn each work or group of works into an album, with the name of the composer as part of the title. The actual disc is irrelevant - so, say, two symphonies on a single disc would be two albums, an opera on three discs would be a single album. So, to take an example, I have an album entitled Mahler Symphony No 7, containing the tracks from the work with each one preceded by a two digit number (01, 02 etc - two digits needed as Windows thinks that 12 comes before 2), as follows;

01 Langsam (Adagio) - Allegro risoluto, ma non troppo
02 Nachtmusik: Allegro moderato
03 Scherzo. Schattenhaft - Trio
04 Nachtmusik: Andante amoroso
05 Rondo-Finale: Tempo I (Allegro ordinario)
06 Applause


This means that albums (and hence works) are alphabetically listed by composer, and I can find the album sorting by composer, album or genre (in this case Mahler symphonies) or by artist (in this case Berlin PO - Abbado).  I might also group works into large albums - for example I have all Klemperer's Beethoven Symphonies  in a single album, the tracks listed as:

Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 02 Andante cantabile con moto
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 03 Menuetto: allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 04 Finale: adagio - allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 02 Larghetto
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 03 Scherzo, trio: allegro
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 04 Allegro molto
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 01 Allegro con brio
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 02 Marcia funebre: adagio assai
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 03 Scherzo: allegro vivace
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 04 Finale: allegro molto

And so on.  Again, I can find them by composer, album title, genre or artist.

This may sound pedantic, but I find it works.

The problem, of course, is that I developed this system early in the piece and to do it retrospectively would be an epic pain.  It is also dependent on playing around in iTunes if you want the tracks in the album to in a different order from the original discs.




« Last Edit: 23:16:22, 03-08-2008 by perfect wagnerite » Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #2 on: 00:00:15, 04-08-2008 »

Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 02 Andante cantabile con moto
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 03 Menuetto: allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 04 Finale: adagio - allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 02 Larghetto
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 03 Scherzo, trio: allegro
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 04 Allegro molto
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 01 Allegro con brio
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 02 Marcia funebre: adagio assai
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 03 Scherzo: allegro vivace
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 04 Finale: allegro molto
Someone who's been doing far too much copy-editing recently asks:

Why 'In' for Symphony No 1 but 'in' for the others? Wink
Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #3 on: 00:05:33, 04-08-2008 »

Organising audio on the computers and elsewhere (lots of my recordings are not music) is a complete nightmare - I've got nowhere near a satisfactory solution.

Logged
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #4 on: 07:14:12, 04-08-2008 »

Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 02 Andante cantabile con moto
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 03 Menuetto: allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 1 In C Op 21 - 04 Finale: adagio - allegro molto e vivace
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 01 Adagio molto - allegro con brio
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 02 Larghetto
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 03 Scherzo, trio: allegro
Symphony No 2 in D Op 36 - 04 Allegro molto
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 01 Allegro con brio
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 02 Marcia funebre: adagio assai
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 03 Scherzo: allegro vivace
Symphony No 3 in E flat Op 55 - 04 Finale: allegro molto
Someone who's been doing far too much copy-editing recently asks:

Why 'In' for Symphony No 1 but 'in' for the others? Wink

The curse of the Gracenote capital letters probably striking again ...

Being a pedant, I'm going to have to go away and change it.  Now.   Wink
Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
IgnorantRockFan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 794



WWW
« Reply #5 on: 08:38:40, 04-08-2008 »

an opera on three discs would be a single album.

Can you explain how you achieve that? I was attempting to rip a double CD the other day using Windows Media Player and couldn't work out how to combine it into a single album. Media Player automatically put each disc into a separate folder, and just copying from one folder to the other didn't do anything. Instead of showing 12 (CD1) + 6 (CD2) tracks, the album was listed in the Media Player library as containing only the 6 tracks from CD2. Renaming the files so the tracks ran from 01 - 18 instead of 01-12 and 01 - 06 didn't work either.

Logged

Allegro, ma non tanto
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #6 on: 11:09:00, 04-08-2008 »

an opera on three discs would be a single album.

Can you explain how you achieve that? I was attempting to rip a double CD the other day using Windows Media Player and couldn't work out how to combine it into a single album. Media Player automatically put each disc into a separate folder, and just copying from one folder to the other didn't do anything. Instead of showing 12 (CD1) + 6 (CD2) tracks, the album was listed in the Media Player library as containing only the 6 tracks from CD2. Renaming the files so the tracks ran from 01 - 18 instead of 01-12 and 01 - 06 didn't work either.



I don't know how to do this in WMP, but in iTunes the key is the track and disc numbers under "get info".  In most cases the tracks will stay in the right order and you just have to change the album title and renumber the tracks.  In some cases (for example where you want to put the tracks into a more logical order, as might happen with, say, a disc of 18th Century concerti) you need to alter the track numbers in the "get info" track.

I guess the track numbers will be the key in WMP too.
Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
IgnorantRockFan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 794



WWW
« Reply #7 on: 12:41:21, 04-08-2008 »

Hmm. I suspect that WMP isn't as fully-features as iTunes, but I think you've given me an idea of how I should have been doing it. I will fiddle a bit more tonight...

Logged

Allegro, ma non tanto
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: