it does seem that, despite the fact that this is a "new music award", musical innovation as such (despite the effusive blurb) seems to be fairly low in the priorities of the artists concerned, as opposed to putting music in funny places etc.
We're back on the measurable vs. less easily measurable criteria, as in the 'outreach' discussion, aren't we? This problem of evaluation (evaluating
what, as well as how) does seem to come up always in relation to funding.
The trouble is that none of these works actually exist yet, and they were chosen on the basis of project-concept submissions, so that those which could come accompanied by thousands of words of sensationalist/pseudointellectual hype were probebly more likely to succeed
They'll be quoting
Mille Plateaux next!