The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
01:00:05, 03-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: The Girls  (Read 935 times)
Flattened Fifth
Guest
« on: 12:19:13, 30-06-2007 »


I've been thinking about girl jazzmen, to coin a phrase.   I sometimes work with schools and hear a lot of potentially great jazz musicianship amongst young girl players, particularly tenor sax for some reason.   Yet they don't seem to be making it onto the jazz scene in any numbers.

Is this a sexist thing, I wonder, or do they just always regard it as 'something best done alone in the bedroom'?   The number of women working in jazz today is still unbelievably small, and I know there are those who think this is as it should be, but I don't have any hang-ups on that front.

I think of Allison Neale, Nikki Iles, Ingrid Laubrock, Alyson Cawley (whatever happened to her?), Karen Sharpe (and her too?), Annie Whitehead of course and Zoe Rahman maybe!   And then I think of a million-and-one girl singers!   Of course I have fond memories of Kathy Stobart and even of Barbara Thompson before she became too funky for me!   They're just not in it for the long haul, it seems.   

I've met a couple of good working female bassists over the years and I fell madly in love with Ivy Benson's girl drummer, Paula Pike,  when I was sixteen, but the ladies could do better in the field, I think.   Any views on this?
Logged
calum da jazbo
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 213



« Reply #1 on: 13:50:22, 30-06-2007 »

hi flattened fifth; agree with you. i can't remeber their names alas, but Humph's latest band has two fine women saxophonists and at the excellent mingus Big Band tour last month their baritone player was a woman. mebbe it is just happening slow! there are of course some noted women pianists and arrangers.

Logged

It's just a matter of time before we're late.
George Garnett
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3855



« Reply #2 on: 14:06:20, 30-06-2007 »

i can't remeber their names alas, but Humph's latest band has two fine women saxophonists

Karen Sharp and Kathy Stobart? I've seen both (or do I mean each?) of them with Humph but not actually together.


(Whoops, sorry, just seen they have already been mentioned in Flattened Fifth's first post Smiley)
« Last Edit: 14:10:22, 30-06-2007 by George Garnett » Logged
BobbyZ
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 992



« Reply #3 on: 15:49:06, 30-06-2007 »

I'm not speaking from any position of great inside knowledge but think that the problems would be cultural. The jazz world can be pretty macho, on a different level for instance there aren't many female posters venturing to this part of the board either here on at the more widely used BBC board. The gigging life may lack appeal too. Lack of role models, expectations etc all play a part. The girl singer is the expected role. Pianists have been tolerated but only if they sing too. You can place rock music in the same category really, not many female instrumentalists. Folk music does a lot better, classical is getting there, the Vienna Phil notwithstanding. Is there still this feeling that some instruments are more applicable to one sex rather than the other ?
Logged

Dreams, schemes and themes
Tony Watson
Guest
« Reply #4 on: 16:35:04, 30-06-2007 »

Does anyone remember the case of Billy Tipton the jazz pianist? It was only when he died they found out he was a woman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Tipton

Then there's the film Some Like It Hot.
Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #5 on: 17:06:27, 30-06-2007 »

Across the pond, but don't forget Carla Bley . . .
Logged
burning dog
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 192



« Reply #6 on: 17:42:03, 30-06-2007 »

There are lot of reasons that jazz was a predominately male career in the USA of the segregation era. Female musicians tended to either be married to the bandleader and/or be a singer with enough commercial value to be chaperoned etc. There is also the point about brass instruments (and drums) being seen as  boys instruments, this was even true in British brass bands until recently. In early jazz women tended to be pianists. 
The paucity of women these days is partly due to lack of role models, plus the overly competitive nature of some styles of instrumental jazz. All male groups tend to become macho by there very nature, add more than one or two women and they become less so.

Mary Lou Williams and Lil Hardin Armstrong were important early jazz women, both pianists
« Last Edit: 17:44:27, 30-06-2007 by burning dog » Logged
Daniel
*****
Posts: 764



« Reply #7 on: 20:28:48, 30-06-2007 »

Nobody has mentioned Nina Simone yet I think. I think Jessica Williams carves out a reasonable living from her piano playing too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Williams

Do I get darts thrown at me if I mention Diana Krall too  Embarrassed
Logged
BobbyZ
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 992



« Reply #8 on: 20:38:23, 30-06-2007 »

No darts Daniel but they are all still pianists / singers aren't they ?
Logged

Dreams, schemes and themes
Daniel
*****
Posts: 764



« Reply #9 on: 20:48:26, 30-06-2007 »

Yes two of them are. I've never heard Jessica Williams sing though.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #10 on: 21:14:44, 30-06-2007 »

Anyone have any figures on the percentages of women active in jazz compared to classical, folk, rock? Also, how does the situation compare in improv?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #11 on: 21:37:02, 30-06-2007 »

I don't know about figures, but my impression is that the proportion of women in free improvisation, while still a minority, is somewhat higher than that in jazz: names that spring quickly to mind are Gail Brand, Marilyn Crispell, Charlotte Hug, Anne La Berge, Joëlle Léandre, Kaffe Matthews, Andrea Neumann, Maggie Nicols, Mary Oliver, Irene Schweizer, Birgit Ulher, Ute Wassermann, to name only some I've seen perform fairly recently, but then improvisation starts with the advantage of being by definition (if not always in practice) an egalitarian way of making music.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #12 on: 21:57:45, 30-06-2007 »

improvisation starts with the advantage of being by definition (if not always in practice) an egalitarian way of making music.
Not necessarily disagreeing here, but could you elaborate on this?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #13 on: 22:02:27, 30-06-2007 »

I think it's pretty obvious! because everyone taking part is potentially equally active as composer and performer, and there's no separation of functions into front line/rhythm section etc.
Logged
supermarket_sweep
*
Posts: 45



« Reply #14 on: 23:32:07, 30-06-2007 »

Surprised nobody's mentioned

Alice Coltrane

Her music certainly an acquired taste, but sublime if you're "in the mood," so to speak. Mad rushing psychadelic strings with weird queasy organ/rippling harp/strangely static piano - with alternately a sense of great drama or static, meditative timelesness (the static, timeless feel somethign I always felt came across in her solos with John Coltrane, unlike McCoy Tyner, who conveyed more of a sense of development, of moving things forward).

There's a section in Valerie Wilmer's quite brilliant guide to the 'new thing'/ 'new black music' (whatever you want to call it) of the 60s/70s about the role of women in the music, but, apart from that, I don't recall reading many serious attempts to address the issue. And it's only really a small part of Wilmer's book (though impeccably researched and thought-provoking, as you'd expect). Deserves a whole book of its own, really...

Interesting that free improv, which (you may disagree) essentialy grew out of free jazz, often seen as just as macho, if not more so, than 'straight' jazz - yet it seems much more egalitarian, open to women, as Richard suggests...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to: