But it occurs to me that your quote might be slightly sarcastic, as if to say that what they are taught at the conservatory is to make noises with their voice but they learn to sing elsewhere.
My guess is that it was meant along the same lines as that oft-repeated line about only learning to drive once one has passed one's test.
I read it as a much more negative comment towards conservatory training. Given that
La Dessay never went to a conservatory herself and still made a huge international career, maybe she's trying to say that her musical education is exemplary for a good singer? That she's lucky
not to have been to a conservatory, because then she would never have been the great singer she is now? That singing teaching in conservatories nowadays is somehow completely
off, and there's no way you'll learn to be a decent singer there?
So my problem remains: what's so terribly wrong with them?
I have heard these sort of comments before - "no good singers are coming out of conservatories anymore", "they make your voice thick and heavy",... The latter especially I cannot understand: how do you get a voice to be 'heavy'- doesn't everyone just sing with his of her own voice? How can voice training change the colour of your voice?
Is there anyone who has these negative views on singing training in conservatories too? Or who has heard about them?
What assets does private teaching have then? Isn't that just the same: a singer, a singing teacher, together in a room, singing? What difference does it make? Does it have something to do with the institution? Time-pressure maybe?
It's best not to learn to sing IN a conservatory. It'll annoy the neighbours.
Haha! I'm annoying my neighbours with my singing anyway, even though we don't have a conservatory