The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
08:35:34, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: 'Authenticity' in the orchestra?  (Read 1290 times)
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #45 on: 11:18:35, 28-07-2007 »

Here at least is what James Gourlay has to say on the topic of cimbassi. This should keep Reiner happy!

www.jamesgourlay.com/downloads/james_gourlay_cimbasso_paper.pdf
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #46 on: 11:58:10, 28-07-2007 »

This seems a sensible rundown of the xylophone's history:

http://www.vsl.co.at/en-us/70/3196/3204/3205/5729.vsl

Odd that neither the African instruments nor the instrument nowadays are without resonators but the European variety seems to have been, precisely at the time it entered the orchestra... on the other hand no one puts a percussion instrument directly on a table-top and the straw supports might have at least let the sound out a bit. (Or rather they must have!)

I wouldn't be surprised if even the xylophone part in Salome had been written for a four-row instrument (Strauss specifies 'Holz- und Strohinstrument'), which would oddly enough probably make the upward white-note scales in the dance of the seven veils easier than on the modern instrument...
« Last Edit: 12:00:37, 28-07-2007 by oliver sudden » Logged
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #47 on: 11:59:50, 28-07-2007 »

re: strohfiedel

of course all the middle-range keyed percussion instruments can be, and are, "rolled up rather like a set of spanners" when they are transported around. All but the glockenspiel
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #48 on: 12:14:06, 28-07-2007 »

I was indeed wondering how the Sinfonietta part could be played on a slide trombone, although Janacek isn't known for his idiomatic writing for any instrument so it could just have been one of his maggots, as they used to say. I wonder how often the part is played on valved trombones in the "West". Anyone who's going this weekend - keep your eyes peeled please.
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #49 on: 12:53:18, 28-07-2007 »

I was indeed wondering how the Sinfonietta part could be played on a slide trombone
In general, surprisingly well! Smiley

If my memory serves me correctly (and there's a first time for everything) the only really messy bit is those turns in the solos before the Witches' Ride bit, isn't it? (I forget if it's really intended as a stampede of the undead or if it just sounds like one.) I think trombonists in general have managed to flick their collective slides around that by now - although either tongued or slid rather than slurred... certainly on listening just now I doubt that even the Czech Phil under Ančerl used valve trombones for it.



PS: Berlin Phil / Abbado - of the faster turns, the trombonist simply doesn't play the first (he just plays the lower note), which is a surprise because he nails the second beautifully.
« Last Edit: 13:07:46, 28-07-2007 by oliver sudden » Logged
Kittybriton
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 2690


Thank you for the music ...


WWW
« Reply #50 on: 15:00:22, 28-07-2007 »

And for anyone like me, who gets lost easily, a shortcut
Logged

Click me ->About me
or me ->my handmade store
No, I'm not a complete idiot. I'm only a halfwit. In fact I'm actually a catfish.
David_Underdown
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 346



« Reply #51 on: 13:08:12, 31-07-2007 »

When I was a youngster the local authority wind orchestra I played with did an exchange with a Czech band, I've a feeling that they brought something like that xylophone over with them.  Form what I dimly remember it rested on some sort of frame, rather than directly on a table, but I only saw it once, a dozen years ago.
Logged

--
David
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #52 on: 18:32:17, 14-12-2007 »

I'm moved to wake up this thread having recently heard the recording of Ravel orchestral music by Anima Eterna conducted by Jos van Immerseel.

Immerseel and his band have collected a remarkable array of instruments for the purpose. The piano in the left hand concerto is a 1905 Érard and everyone else has moved mountains to give themselves hardware from Ravel's day.

Of course there are fairly substantial differences between the instruments Ravel knew and the ones we play today: the French bassoon has practically died out outside Francophonie and even in French-speaking lands it seems every few years another basson section gives up and goes Heckel. French French horns often had a piston mechanism and were usually played with a light vibrato (a bit like a tasteful flute one). The brasses (and saxophones) were generally smaller-bored if I understand correctly, the percussion instruments were smaller and lighter, the strings were slightly differently set up.

Even the instruments which are mechanically much the same were played slightly differently - flute vibrato was faster but smaller (even from Moyse himself), the oboe and clarinet sound was brighter.

But shortly after I bought the Immerseel disc I bought the Andante box I've mentioned elsewhere, of recordings from Ravel's time or shortly after, including Ravel's own recording of Bolero. Despite the instrument collection, the Immerseel sounds nothing like these old recordings.

Indeed, when one looks a bit closer at the instrument list the collection itself isn't quite all it's cracked up to be. Some of the clarinets are simple-system rather than Klosé-Buffet (makes a huge difference in the solo near the beginning of Bolero). Two of the bassoons aren't actually Buffet or even Selmer but 'built by the players themselves according to the tonal aesthetic of the period'. (Which might explain a bit why they don't sound either German or French.) The contrabassoon is indeed a Heckel (!), the bass clarinet also appears to be German. The 1905 piano sounds lovely, but, well, the concerto is from 1929-1930 - so of course it does and doesn't sound much like the piano in Cortot's 1939 recording. A lot of the tempi are very different indeed from the 1930s recordings... although I suppose you wouldn't necessarily always want the Pavane to zip by in 4'50".

Main thing though is... the musical approach doesn't really have anything to do with what the players from the 1930s seem to have done. Bolero is on the Immerseel disc and twice in the Andante box (conducted by Ravel and Coppola). The trombone solo is particularly spectatular: the notated glissandi are pretty subtle but there are lots of unwritten ones. But the main difference is the use of rubato in the melody - Immerseel's lot plod solidly on, Ravel's and Coppola's bands constantly bend the rhythm, often in reasonably consistent ways that Immerseel doesn't seem to have tried to do.

I've always had a pet dream of having a period-instrument orchestra based on 1930s Paris - you could do Ravel, Debussy, Stravinsky, Varèse, Prokofiev and lots of other magical things. What a shame someone with a chance to actually realise such a thing has left so many stones unturned...

Anyone else know both the new recording and the box of old ones?
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #53 on: 18:51:23, 14-12-2007 »

I know the Anima Eterna disc well, but the box not at all (although I've certainly heard the Ravel recording, and it's sitting as a radio-dub on one of five hard-drives sitting above my desk - but disconnected).  Sad
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to: