Oddly, I was taught maths at junior school by VDGG's saxophonist. He used to write songs for the school to sing, and regularly played two saxes at once in assembly.
NB
The two sax thing was always an eyecatcher at their concerts, NB. I liked Jackson's
sound but whether that was because of or in spite of this gimmick I couldn't say. As with Emerson or Wakeman's keyboard 'wizardry', mature reflection causes one to ask whether, if a person is playing two instruments at once, they can possibly be playing
either of them very well.
I must say, I can see what you mean about him - however, I don't think pretentiousness in rock music is necessarily a bad thing - I like the idea of an artist's reach exceeding his grasp.
I agree to an extent, Swan_Knight. I'm not one to get snooty about prog rock just for
trying to make something more profound out of what is essentially a ephemeral artform. But the genre did rather vanish up its own backside in the 1970s; probably because it was, by its nature, doomed to take itself too seriously. And if Hammill wasn't a prime example of someone taking himself too seriously his humour must be the driest I've ever come across.
Would be very interested in reading your thoughts on VDGG/Hammill and what changed your mind about them/him.
I sort of went off nearly all pop/rock music a few decades ago, so it wasn't reallly a question of changing my mind about Hammill and VdGG in particular. It's not so much that I started to
dislike the music; I just found 'classical' music much more attractive and took a 'life's too short' approach to pop & rock. My first record collection (about 75% pop/rock) went astray in one of my many changes of address and, while I have rebuilt and greatly extended my 'classical' library, the only rock CD for which I felt sufficient need to pay full price was 'Hot Rats'. I picked up some other bits and pieces at 'economy' prices (mostly in the German shop 'Zweitausendeins') but it's only recently that prices for the rock back catalogue have begun to fall to reasonable levels so I feel I can justify buying CDs that might only get played once 'for old time's sake'. For example, I picked up Neil Young's 'After the Gold Rush' and Wishbone Ash's 'Argus' yesterday in HMV's 'Two for £10' offer. Others for which I might give a fiver were still outrageously overpriced - most of Pink Floyd, for example, was still £12-15 and Roy Harper's 'Stormcock' was a preposterous £19: I can't even be sure I'll still like it fgs!
Van der Graaf Generator albums are still firmly in the premium price category. I picked up 'First Generation' for about €5 in Zweitausendeins a few years ago - which is why I'm able to listen to 'A Plague of Lighthouse Keepers' from time to time - but I'm afraid I'm relying on my memory for comments on the albums. Van der Graaf Generator seems to fit a familiar pattern in my life whereby I'm strongly attracted to artists who become the subject of cultish devotion - Wagner, Jacques Brel, Frank Zappa are other examples - but I always stop short of becoming obsessive about them myself. Wagner, Brel & Zappa are arguably towering geniuses but it was clear to me long ago that Hammill most definitely isn't and it's possible that I found the seriousness with which he takes himself, and with which his devotees take him, rather off-putting. Before I 'went off' rock music I bought Hammill's book 'Killers, Angels, Refugees' (now disappeared along with my first record collection). I don't think I even read it all before becoming convinced that much of Hamill's work was little more than rambling. To its credit it is, in some of the song lyrics, quite elegant rambling; but pretentious for all that.
And that name! Does
anyone know why they chose the name Van der Graaf Generator? The only thing I can think of was that it's a deliberate change of spelling from van de Graaff for patent or copyright reasons. Or is it just another example pointless obscurantism?