The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
09:53:17, 03-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: John Tilbury's Cage Sonatas and Interludes on Explore Records  (Read 384 times)
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« on: 17:41:08, 21-02-2007 »

For several months now, I have had a message sitting on the 20th Century forum at Explore Records's site. It expressed the hope that the Explore release of John Tilbury's Petersham recording of Cage's Sonatas and Interludes would not carry over the track division error found on the old Decca Japan issue. I got no response to the message, so when I saw that Caiman were offering the disc at a low price, I ordered it. It arrived in the post this morning. Same fault as the Decca Japan issue. I had hoped that someone with an ounce of familiarity with the work would have picked up on the error before launching the international issue, but no. Ah well, we probably all tend to listen to all 16 sonatas and 4 interludes at a go, I suppose. Shame they didn't retain the original Decca artwork, too. They did, however, keep Tilbury's programme notes. They are worth a read. The transfer is otherwise very good, I think.
Logged
jamesweeks
*
Posts: 33


« Reply #1 on: 21:15:54, 21-02-2007 »

Yes that pissed me off too, but I do just love the playing, bracing and magisterial, and the timbres of the prepared notes are the most satisfying of the versions I know - variety but not just beautiful sounds.

What do others think about the various versions on CD of this piece?
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #2 on: 22:01:37, 21-02-2007 »

Yes, james, and the timbres are so much more clearly presented in the CD issue. John Tilbury is so right about the placing of the mutes. It's the sound that matters, not the bloody ruler. I remember when Tilbury played the work at the Cage at 70 celebration in Islington, Cage was very forthcoming with his praise for the performance. It is all too easy for someone playing this work to forget that it was written at the height of Cage's engagement with the tonal qualities acheivable from piano preparations, and before the chance philosphy became predominant.

Another recoding I have a particular fondness for is the early digital one played by Yuji Takehashi. Then, more recently, there's Schleiermacher. I have not heard the Margaret Leng Tan on Mode yet, but intend to do so. Tilbury's approach has, if he will excuse the aristocratic referrence, a particular nobility though.
« Last Edit: 23:15:24, 21-02-2007 by Bryn » Logged
jamesweeks
*
Posts: 33


« Reply #3 on: 22:35:32, 21-02-2007 »

It IS the sound that matters, yes, though I remember a performance I put on at the school I teach at 4 years ago, which was prepared by David Nicholls. IIRC, he argued that the laissez-faire attitude to the placement of mutes had gone too far, and so he went as close as he could possibly get to Cage's measurements (or the closest well-sounding mutation, bearing in mind differences of piano design). I don't know whether he had particular players in mind when suggesting that people were becoming lazy about Cage's prescriptions, but again I defer to others' greater knowledge. Anyway, the Tilbury ones certainly sound fab!
Logged
aaron cassidy
****
Posts: 499



WWW
« Reply #4 on: 01:21:16, 22-02-2007 »

What do others think about the various versions on CD of this piece?

My favorite remains Nigel Butterley's version on Tall Poppies.  I own four versions, and I'll admit that I might like this one best b/c it was the first one I bought (maybe 12ish yrs ago?).
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: