MJ, this is part of a gradual trickle of revelations which, in the long game, i'd suggest you can trace back to victorian repression and exploitation- a very nasty cult. The insidious bit is the way it infects 'families' as a compulsive and even normative behaviour. The story here is also about political cover-up, of whichm, as in the aforementioned 'families', there is a great deal.

The investigation is going to take a long time, why do we need daily updates with very little news to add?

OK, the publcity has meant a lot of former inmates hearing about it offering evidence etc.

But it's not as if it's the only home where abuse took place. Charles Dickens suggested over 100 years ago that abuse was common in homes. The situation has been tolerated by the country as a whole for decades but cover ups were also tolerated and children were always too ashamed or frightened to report anything.

Events at Jersey might mean reports coming in about dozens of homes around the country, how will the police cope?

Who is guilty, not just the perpetrators. Same with domestic staff of the nobility, everyone knew it was going on, so who was guilty?

Some reporters are starting to ridicule the chief in charge of the Jersey enquiry, about the way he's handling the investigation and comments he makes.

I read somewhere about previous use of the building where the Jersey home is, about rubble 'imported' by builders and that the child's skull may have come in with the rubble......