Beggars become Princes' brothers
Where thy gentle wing abides.
Be embraced, millions!
This kiss to the entire world!
Joy all creatures drink
At nature's bosoms;
All, Just and Unjust,
Follow her rose-petalled path.
Endure courageously, millions!
Endure for the better world!
The account of our misdeeds be destroyed!
Reconciled the entire world!
Eternally may last all sworn Oaths,
Truth towards friend and enemy,
Men's pride before Kings' thrones--
Brothers, even it if meant our Life and blood,
Give the crowns to those who earn them,
Defeat to the pack of liars!
Close the holy circle tighter,
Swear by this golden wine:
To remain true to the Oath,
Swear it by the Judge above the stars!
Delivery from tyrants' chains,
Generosity also towards the villain,
Hope on the deathbeds,
Mercy from the final judge!
Well, it's hardly just 5 lines, Baz. Not to put too fine a point on it, it has liberté, égalité and fraternité written all over it.
The clearest reference to all that in the music for me is in Beethoven's mixture of forms and 'levels' - popular song, boozy march, heavenly adoration (no, he doesn't manage an atheist vision... but he does manage a god before whom all are equal).
But perhaps you'll call that 'patchy, insignificant, unconvincing and spurious' as well. That's your call, but I don't think you're understanding all of Beethoven's or Schiller's message in doing so.
I agree Ollie - but "liberté, égalité and fraternité " are not the concoctions of politics. They are at the heart of Christianity too. The fact that these became the cliché adopted by the French government is inconsequential (though perhaps gratifying).
With regard to my understanding of
Beethoven's understanding of Schiller's message, I have something a little more positive to offer than has been forthcoming so far.
The last Movt of no. 9 starts, as we all know, with a repetition of all the main themes of the previous movements (yes?). Systematically, each in turn is
rejected and cast aside, culminating with the final "acceptance" of the
Ode to Joy theme.
I should therefore like to know how Schiller's "message" impacted in any way upon the first three movements (affecting, in any way whatsoever, their musical content or structure). I should also like to know exactly HOW the portion you have repeated in your message above could not be interpreted in a perfectly normal Christian framework. At what point am I supposed to accede to the view that the meaning is "political".
With regard to the idea of a "boozy march", you probably have in mind the stereotypical "Turkish March" (well rehearsed previously by Mozart and others) in which he introduces a complete Turkish band. Are you also suggesting something that is somehow "political" about that too?
Baz