The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:49:12, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
  Print  
Author Topic: Split from the Riegger Thread: Politics and Music  (Read 1794 times)
Don Basilio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2682


Era solo un mio sospetto


« Reply #120 on: 16:27:57, 15-12-2007 »


You are right to draw these parallels, but wrong in equating the "religious" with the "political".
Baz

But I carefully didn't equate them.  I made a point of saying "some political movements which have had a strong Christian element in their inspiration".

I completely fail to see how it is illogical to bring politics into religion.  Jesus of Nazareth seems to have done so (to quote a passage I chose for a carol service I was helping arrange.)

"When Jesus came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him.  He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written:

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor.

He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives, and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour."  Luke 4.16

Thank you, martle, for the comments of Beethoven 9, which I have tended to take for granted of late.
Logged

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven.
A time to weep, and a time to laugh: a time to mourn, and a time to dance
Baz
Guest
« Reply #121 on: 17:50:21, 15-12-2007 »

Beggars become Princes' brothers
 Where thy gentle wing abides.

Be embraced, millions!
 This kiss to the entire world!
 
 Joy all creatures drink
 At nature's bosoms;
 All, Just and Unjust,
 Follow her rose-petalled path.
 
Endure courageously, millions!
Endure for the better world!

The account of our misdeeds be destroyed!
Reconciled the entire world!

Eternally may last all sworn Oaths,
Truth towards friend and enemy,
Men's pride before Kings' thrones--
Brothers, even it if meant our Life and blood,
Give the crowns to those who earn them,
Defeat to the pack of liars!

Close the holy circle tighter,
Swear by this golden wine:
To remain true to the Oath,
Swear it by the Judge above the stars!
Delivery from tyrants' chains,
Generosity also towards the villain,
Hope on the deathbeds,
Mercy from the final judge!

Well, it's hardly just 5 lines, Baz. Not to put too fine a point on it, it has liberté, égalité and fraternité written all over it.

The clearest reference to all that in the music for me is in Beethoven's mixture of forms and 'levels' - popular song, boozy march, heavenly adoration (no, he doesn't manage an atheist vision... but he does manage a god before whom all are equal).

But perhaps you'll call that 'patchy, insignificant, unconvincing and spurious' as well. That's your call, but I don't think you're understanding all of Beethoven's or Schiller's message in doing so.

I agree Ollie - but "liberté, égalité and fraternité " are not the concoctions of politics. They are at the heart of Christianity too. The fact that these became the cliché adopted by the French government is inconsequential (though perhaps gratifying).

With regard to my understanding of Beethoven's understanding of Schiller's message, I have something a little more positive to offer than has been forthcoming so far.

The last Movt of no. 9 starts, as we all know, with a repetition of all the main themes of the previous movements (yes?). Systematically, each in turn is rejected and cast aside, culminating with the final "acceptance" of the Ode to Joy theme.

I should therefore like to know how Schiller's "message" impacted in any way upon the first three movements (affecting, in any way whatsoever, their musical content or structure). I should also like to know exactly HOW the portion you have repeated in your message above could not be interpreted in a perfectly normal Christian framework. At what point am I supposed to accede to the view that the meaning is "political".

With regard to the idea of a "boozy march", you probably have in mind the stereotypical "Turkish March" (well rehearsed previously by Mozart and others) in which he introduces a complete Turkish band. Are you also suggesting something that is somehow "political" about that too?

Baz
« Last Edit: 17:58:02, 15-12-2007 by Baz » Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #122 on: 18:06:11, 15-12-2007 »

With regard to the idea of a "boozy march", you probably have in mind the sterotypical "Turkish March" (well rehearsed previously by Mozart and others) in which he introduces a complete Turkish band. Are you also suggesting something that is somehow "political" about that too?
Almost all representations of Turkish music in late 18th/early 19th century music was understood at the time in terms of political meanings, in terms of representation of the supposedly barbaric, licentious East, with memories of the Battle of Vienna of 1683, and the more recent Russo-Turkish War of 1768-74. Beethoven's particular employment of this musical trope (which he had used elsewhere, for example in the Rondo Capriccio (Rage over a Lost Penny) in the Ninth Symphony, seems more inclusive rather than 'othering', as was the case with many earlier examples of the alla turca style, including Mozart's. Countless amounts of writing from the time show what 'Turkey' represented to Central European audiences.
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #123 on: 19:13:38, 15-12-2007 »

I agree Ollie - but "liberté, égalité and fraternité " are not the concoctions of politics. They are at the heart of Christianity too. The fact that these became the cliché adopted by the French government is inconsequential (though perhaps gratifying).

Not only the French government of course but the French revolution, probably the most momentous event in European politics in Beethoven's lifetime; and to one of whose leading figures Beethoven had already dedicated a symphony - although he famously tore out the dedication when he saw him going against those very ideals.

Schiller likewise welcomed the French revolution (and was made an honorary member of the French Republic, to a great extent because of the revolutionary ideals embodied in his early play Die Räuber); and like Beethoven he became disillusioned with it. ("A great moment has found a little people.") At least, so wiki tells me.

For me the Turkishness of the march isn't its most important feature; it seems more like a popular march to me. But of course either way the fact that it reaches beyond 'pure' music is pretty clear.

I don't really care to sift through the first three movements looking for more or less specific political connections. As far as I'm concerned the fact that the work culminates in the clear message of Schiller's text is enough. In any case - yes, the recitative text makes it clear that only something going beyond the material of the first three movements will do the job. That certainly doesn't rule out a political message - on the contrary, if anything it strengthens a 'revolutionary' interpretation.
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #124 on: 19:27:15, 15-12-2007 »

One thing that's unprecedented and "revolutionary" in Beethoven's music (and here I would count the 3rd and 5th symphonies as much as the 9th, and other pieces too) is a new attitude towards the structure of instrumental music which is characterised by the musical material itself being in a state of conflict or struggle, leading towards resolution and triumph. Before the French revolution (and before it became possible for a composer to live without being the servant of a prince or bishop, which happened in the same general period, not by coincidence) such musical forms were in a real sense "unthinkable". Therefore the social upheavals (and therefore the politics) of Beethoven's time did, I think, have a direct impact on the was the music is structured, and in doing so expanded the scope and depth of symphonic form.
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #125 on: 23:36:32, 15-12-2007 »

One thing that's unprecedented and "revolutionary" in Beethoven's music
And one thing that's particularly instructive in looking at this kind of thing in Beethoven is to look at what the same kind of materials do in his near-contemporaries or predecessors... For me it's very interesting to look at the 'military' interruptions in the Haydn 'Military' symphony compared with the interjections of military music in the Beethoven Missa Solemnis. Somehow (for me at least) even though the military outbursts in the Haydn have a quite chilling effect they never seem to threaten the viability of the form - whereas in the Beethoven they seem to underline the unrealistic nature of the 'dona nobis pacem' in a fundamental way.

Resolution and triumph - that's a provocative notion in Beethoven for me since I hardly never find that his 'triumphant' resolutions are unequivocally so. For me the fervently willed but ultimately incomplete triumph is a fundamental part of Beethoven's (especially late) music. In the 9th as much as anywhere.
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #126 on: 23:46:13, 15-12-2007 »

I hardly never find

Hm.

What I was saying wasn't intended to imply that the "triumph" need be unalloyed (the incompleteness of it is if anything a further token of those times of upheaval and uncertainty).
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #127 on: 23:52:04, 15-12-2007 »


Hey, it was a great dinner.

...but indeed. Beethoven hardly ever manages to convince me that his happy endings are completely happy. Why that might be I don't really know. Of course besides the political element the fact that he was both deaf and never socially quite as accepted as he surely had a right to be might well count for something.

I've mentioned this before, I think.



A little Hörstück with recordings of various Beethoven works acoustically processed to sound as they might have to him at the time. Quite fascinating.
Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #128 on: 00:48:09, 16-12-2007 »


  You bough down, millions?
  Can you sense the Creator, world?
  Seek him above the starry canopy.
  Above the stars He must dwell.

We do not blame the Member for this example of the New Barbarism; we expect he was hastily pasting. It is really only the homo-sexualists who can be expected to be meticulous in matters like these is it not?


  Ihr stürzt nieder, Millionen?
  Ahnest du den Schöpfer, Welt?
  Such' ihn über'm Sternenzelt!
  Über Sternen muß er wohnen.

It is the audition of his setting of these lines forward to which we look most eagerly whenever we listen to Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. On the political level it tells us that its composer was as indeed we all should be a firm champion of the dismantling of "nation states" and the introduction of World Government. This is political with a vengeance; it recommends that the political as it has been hitherto known should finally self-destruct - turn upon and consume itself - leaving a mere residue of "who knows what?"

On the literary level it has the quality of the best British writers of Science Fiction, such as Shiel Wells and so on.

But it is upon the spiritual level that everything comes together in a most marvellous mysticism. We cannot get enough of those new spheres can we and it reminds us of the composer Ruggles' repeating to himself a single chord for hours on end. (We have always maintained that the principle of harmonic - as opposed to contrapuntal - beauty is to be sought in a chord in entire isolation rather than in chords in conjoined succession.) It should be noted too that at the equivalent point - towards the end that is - of his Third symphony Beethoven inserts a really very similar mystical passage and probably even then in 1804 he was thinking along the same lines. What a mind the man had - and what a nuisance his impetuous young nephew must have been!
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #129 on: 01:06:58, 16-12-2007 »

über'm

muß

(It might be instructive to note parenthetically that properly the apostrophe should at least now-a-days be used in German only to indicate the elision of an e, contractions such as aufs or überm (for auf das and über dem) being spelt without (as in Schiller's Ode as found here). Even the Germanists have been known to get these things wrong but of course that is no excuse for such as we...

For completeness' sake we might also note that the scharfes s is also now-a-days (although not in Schiller's time) properly reserved for situations where the preceding vowel is long, of which muß is not one. So groß not gross, dass not daß - although this spelling reform remains controversial and even several notable newspapers the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung being one cling to the old spelling.)
« Last Edit: 01:10:04, 16-12-2007 by oliver sudden » Logged
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #130 on: 09:55:17, 16-12-2007 »

(We have always maintained that the principle of harmonic - as opposed to contrapuntal - beauty is to be sought in a chord in entire isolation rather than in chords in conjoined succession.)

Logged

Green. Always green.
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #131 on: 09:57:56, 16-12-2007 »

Naughty, martle!  Cheesy
Logged
C Dish
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 481



« Reply #132 on: 11:23:42, 16-12-2007 »

For completeness' sake we might also note that the scharfes s is also now-a-days (although not in Schiller's time) properly reserved for situations where the preceding vowel is long, of which muß is not one. So groß not gross, dass not daß - although this spelling reform remains controversial and even several notable newspapers the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung being one cling to the old spelling.)
I too will stick to ß like the FAZ, at least until threatened with jail time.
Logged

inert fig here
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #133 on: 11:31:59, 16-12-2007 »

(We have always maintained that the principle of harmonic - as opposed to contrapuntal - beauty is to be sought in a chord in entire isolation rather than in chords in conjoined succession.)



Member Grew may well criticise this chord for the absence of its bass note(s), namely A and/or Eb. And he would have a point, would not he?
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #134 on: 11:34:00, 16-12-2007 »

I too will stick to ß like the FAZ, at least until threatened with jail time.


The Eszett Enforcement Division are on their way.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
  Print  
 
Jump to: