The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:37:31, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 43
  Print  
Author Topic: who was Shostakovich?  (Read 25287 times)
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #45 on: 09:16:08, 24-03-2007 »

I'd also be interested to hear your thoughts on that alternative Kondrashin recording of No.4!....

Second alternative recording, Mark: there's already an issue of the German first performance (KK/Staatskapelle Dresden, 23 ii 1963) on Hänssler Profil CD PH06023: a live mono radio recording, very well preserved and transferred. The orchestra starts a tad shakily, but there are sections where the performance really catches fire. The Concertgebouw box didn't arrive yesterday, so I still have that excitement to come....
Logged
George Garnett
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3855



« Reply #46 on: 09:33:49, 24-03-2007 »

On the subject of Kondrashin, I know that Peter Katin who occasionally posts here, always with fascinating insights, has worked with him and found him shall we say 'difficult' (as a person that is, not necessarily in musical terms).

If you happen to read this Peter, anything you feel able to share with us about the experience of working with him would, of course, be of very great interest.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #47 on: 11:19:04, 24-03-2007 »

Just some early thoughts on the Eighth.

 Opus 65, which the composer began sketching in the early summer of 1943, was first performed in November of the same year by the USSR State Symphony Orchestra under Mravinsky. It thus appeared quite soon after the resounding international success of his Seventh Symphony (Op. 60): typically, the composer made no effort in the slightest to capitalise on the success of its predecessor by producing something else in the same vein, creating instead a work of darker hue and more cerebral intensity which perplexed its audience, fell foul of the critics, incensed the authorities and was hardly performed thereafter, effectively disappearing altogether after being singled out for the ultimate artistic crime of ‘formalism’ in 1948. It remained in limbo along with other suppressed works until the sixties, well after Stalin’s death.

 In some ways a return to the purer symphonic aspirations of the Fifth, it nevertheless displays notable departures from standard structure. There are five movements: the first is a huge Adagio, once again showing Mahlerian infuences. It’s followed by two Scherzi, a Largo and an Allegretto, although the last three movements are played without a break. There’s a unifying ‘motto’ cell, too, of three notes: first heard right at the start of the symphony as C-Bb-C in the basses it also appears as a semitone rather than a whole tone progression (at the start of the second movement, for example) and later in the work more normally in inversion (e.g. the start and end of the last movement.)
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #48 on: 12:22:07, 24-03-2007 »

Mr. T. Now you have decided us to give Shortakovich one more try. We admire your determination and have been persuaded that we should emulate you. In due course then we too shall come back with a report to this thread. The mid-point between 1 and 15 is 8, so we shall listen to the Eighth "symphony".

Mr Grew--Delighted to have your company on my expedition of rediscovery. A first report back from my fork of the path: I discovered yesterday evening, quite to my surprise, that I had in fact unwittingly acquired a performance of Symphony No 4 conducted by Kondrashin, on the new Concertgebouw Live 14CD collection. I listened last night; I can't say I'm fully converted yet, though it didn't produce the negative reaction Shostakovich used to bring about in me, and there were some very striking moments. I wasn't very taken with the reproduction quality, which seemed rather limited dynamically and somewhat disturbed by audience noise. I look forward to receiving my Aulos set in the post next week some time.

In the meantime, I shall persist, and am about to listen to the Jerusalem Quartet's new disc of Quartets Nos 6, 8 and 11.


In response to your other comments, Mr Grew:

Quote
In fact the whole of the human race can be thus described, can it not? As an "awkwardness" we mean - as a falling short. Yours is a profoundly religious idea. It is bigger than all of us!

What about seeking and striving though? Are they still necessary do you think?
You've touched the heart of the matter. The question of whether music and art might best represent the 'awkwardness' or the 'seeking and striving' (or some mixture of the two) is hard to decide, but seeing things in those terms does, I feel, help us to recognise that 'inadequate' may not be so much a pull in the opposite direction to 'adequate' as the flip side of the same coin. One only need look underneath. That recognition, in turn, helps us to have patience. And that in its turn may help us to understand. Back to Shotchavoich.


Oh, and this:
Quote
By "staging" we suppose you to mean something like "put on a platform in front of an audience" do you?
Indeed, that is something like what I meant. The platform is not necessary (especially in this age of mechanical and even electronic reproduction), but the audience is essential.
« Last Edit: 12:24:38, 24-03-2007 by time_is_now » Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
Daniel
*****
Posts: 764



« Reply #49 on: 12:28:38, 24-03-2007 »

a coven of woodwinds

That's gorgeous.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #50 on: 15:55:51, 24-03-2007 »

Just on the subject of the Eighth and quotations between other symphonies, has anybody else been struck by the indentical starts to the opening violin theme of the Eighth and the 'infamous tune' in the Seventh?
Logged
roslynmuse
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1615



« Reply #51 on: 22:30:22, 24-03-2007 »

Thanks to all for starting this. I am a Shostakovich agnostic, but will dip in and out of this as an aid toi my continuing education!

For the record, to date, the symphonies I get most out of are Nos 1, 5 and 14. I am sporadically impressed by 2, 3, 8, 10, 13 and 15, am ashamed to say I have never heard No 4, and am thoroughly unconvinced by 6, 7, 9, 11 and 12. So I shall be interested to see what effect these discussions have!

Incidentally, some years ago (1995?) I had the honour of meeting Ilya Musin, legendary conducting tutor at the Leningrad/ St Petersburg Conservatory, who played piano in the first performance of Shost No 1 and played through most of the symphonies with Dmitri as piano duets before their first performances. It was very curious looking into those eyes and seeing a contemporary of Shostakovich with that same lean and hungry look and the same intense stare. He was about 90 at that time and gave some of the most electrifying demonstrations of how to conduct that I have ever seen.
Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #52 on: 11:58:05, 25-03-2007 »

Just on the subject of the Eighth and quotations between other symphonies, has anybody else been struck by the indentical starts to the opening violin theme of the Eighth and the 'infamous tune' in the Seventh?
Absolutely, Ron - as if to announce at the beginning that the Eighth is a more introspective and personal account of the same "material" as the Seventh.

Roslynmuse, I suggest that you acquaint yourself with the Fourth as soon as you can. It's the clearest indication we have of the direction his music might under other circumstance have gone in, quite apart from its own qualities, and the fact that it could well have been an enormously influential piece on musical (and especially symphonic) thinking throughout the world had it been performed in 1936.

I've just finished reading the newish revised version of Ian MacDonald's book on Shostakovich, which, although I don't see eye to eye with it on some historical & political points, is a massive improvement on the original version: occasionally maddening but well worth a look for anyone who's getting interested in Shostakovich.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #53 on: 12:26:59, 25-03-2007 »

I can only echo rb's words on the Fourth, rm. I've spent more time with it than any other work in the last year, and I'm still discovering more on every visit. I've started work on the third movement, and I'm finding I need to be more detailed than I was with the previous two, so it might take some time; within the first three minutes I've discovered a passage which not only refers back to the first movement (a fact noted by Stephen Johnson) but also contains a simultaneous exact quotation from the second; the more one gets to know these works, the more one discovers cross references (such as that from the Seventh to the Eighth mentioned above) which have interesting implications.
« Last Edit: 20:39:54, 25-03-2007 by Ron Dough » Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #54 on: 19:37:35, 25-03-2007 »

Stephen Jonson in Discovery series about Shostakovich Quartet 8 called Shostakovich face as Poker face. I feel so too.
Is this a face of a person who never smiles.
I felt that it was excellent explanation of this tragic quartet (dedicated to himself after he is dead).
I never knew that his marrige to Nina was open marrige. I thought they were in love and he was deeply affected by her death.
« Last Edit: 19:57:42, 25-03-2007 by trained-pianist » Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #55 on: 21:38:01, 25-03-2007 »

As an experiment I've added the Kondrashin timings and the bar numbers to my notes for the second movement of the Fourth, using colour so as to keep them as clear as possible. Unless folk feel that this is making matters more complicated rather than simpler, I'll standardise on this pattern hereafter.
I'm also going back into the notes and adding extra details as they strike me, particularly where I've discovered more references to exisitng motives, such as the use of perfect and augmented fourths together vertically or sequentially.
Ron
« Last Edit: 09:42:05, 26-03-2007 by Ron Dough » Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #56 on: 18:16:41, 26-03-2007 »

I wonder if any of us is really enough of an addict to acquire the Melodiya Kondrashin box in addition to the Aulos box and then let us know if one of them sounds substantially better?

(For those who came in late - the Kondrashin cycle used to be around in annoyingly dodgy transfers on Le Chant du Monde and then was remastered by Aulos so well that it made an already highly desirable set of recordings absolutely indispensable.)

I note that the new Melodiya box includes the Oistrakh/Kondrashin recording of the second violin concerto (magnificent piece, great performance with horns and drums rampant) as well as Stepan Razin, October and The Sun Shines Over Our Motherland. Don't know the last-named but the Stepan Razin recording is magnificent. I suppose it being in that box rules it out for convenient reissue elsewhere...  Angry
« Last Edit: 18:24:17, 26-03-2007 by oliver sudden » Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #57 on: 18:48:46, 26-03-2007 »

Why do I have the suspicion that last is directed at me, Oz? I might have entertained the thought for all of a few seconds, but even for me that's an extravagance too far....I don't really understand why this issue should necessarily preclude separate issues of Stepan Razin, though: there have been parallel issues of Melodiya recordings previously.

(BTW, I notice that Warner's new reissue box of the Rostropovich cycle has hit the shelves at around £35, which almost certainly means that it will be available at a very silly price come sale time.)
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #58 on: 19:32:42, 26-03-2007 »

Wasn't meant all that personally Ron, but if the cap fits... Wink

In fact if it had come out in that form at the time I was still searching for the Kondrashin recording of Stepan Razin I would probably have shrugged my shoulders and bitten the bullet, so to speak. But Bryn and Anna came to my rescue on that front which means the only things new to me in the box would be Kondrashin's thoughts on the Sunshine cantata and October.  Undecided

I've seen the cycle conducted by Maxim Shostakovich highly recommended. Anyone here know it? I don't think it contains his mid-'70s recordings of the Michelangelo songs or the 15th symphony though, which are certainly must-hears.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #59 on: 22:42:04, 26-03-2007 »

Wilf mentioned it on tOb when it was first released here in terms that were not exactly glowing; it's another thing on the list to keep an eye out for in the sales, maybe. There were also several symphonies recorded by Maxim for Collins Classics: perhaps not a completed cycle but the sort of things one might have expected Naxos to pick up in the same way as they've appropriated the Bedford/Britten discs.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 43
  Print  
 
Jump to: