The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:39:24, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 43
  Print  
Author Topic: who was Shostakovich?  (Read 25287 times)
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #465 on: 17:01:06, 06-05-2007 »

Baz, that was a sterling piece of work, as of course have been those by Ron and Oliver which preceded it.

Quote
But "war" is the least suitable subject for a work of Art
War is not the subject of Shostakovich's 8th symphony, it was the occasion of it. Shostakovich didn't sit down at his desk and think to himself "now let's write a piece about war", he was living in a country which was suffering both under a brutal invasion from abroad and under a brutal dictatorship at home. Sydney, it's clear that there is much you refuse to understand, but this must be simple enough even for you.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #466 on: 18:01:53, 06-05-2007 »

Shostakovich didn't sit down at his desk and think to himself "now let's write a piece about war", he was living in a country which was suffering both under a brutal invasion from abroad and under a brutal dictatorship at home. Sydney, it's clear that there is much you refuse to understand, but this must be simple enough even for you.

Well, if a programmatic interpretation does not seem appropriate for the Eight Symphony, couldn't it be said to be true of the Seventh (in terms of war) or the Eleventh and Twelfth (in terms of uprisings and revolutions) or at a push the Thirteenth (in terms of commemorating a calamity of wartime)? Shostakovich may not have said 'now let's write a piece about war', but he may have wanted to use the symphonic medium in part to produce a work that in part attempts to represent the events in question programmatically? Is that so radically different?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
offbeat
****
Posts: 270



« Reply #467 on: 22:29:05, 06-05-2007 »

I think i read somewhere that Shostakovitch wrote it as a war symphony (it certainly contains war themes all thru) but underneath it was a veiled attack on Stalin which for obvious reasons he would deny if challenged...
Logged
ahinton
*****
Posts: 1543


WWW
« Reply #468 on: 23:19:20, 06-05-2007 »

The following excellent book here may also be of interest to Member Grew in this context.
If I were you (which I'm not), I'd be duly wary of wasting time recommending anything of the sort to the member for a description of the activities of whom the phrase "blathering winter Grew-el" might have been specially devised.

As I have indicated before, no one necessarily expects the said member to find that the eighth - or indeed any other - symphony of Shostakovich appeals personally, but to dismiss the work as though it had no substance worthy of serious consideration as the persistent member has done and continues to do demonstrates nothing more than a habitual expressive fatuity. Let us all now hear from Member Flaccid on the subject (even if only for the purpose of availing ourselves of an opportunity to determine whether there is a perceptible difference between the two members).

Best,

Alistair
Logged
oliver sudden
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 6411



« Reply #469 on: 23:32:23, 06-05-2007 »

War is not the subject of Shostakovich's 8th symphony, it was the occasion of it.

We find ourselves in full agreement with Member Barrett on this point. It will perhaps be noted that our reflections on so far the first two movements of Shostakovich's op. 65 have at no point dwelt upon adduced programmatic elements. This is in no way to deny the validity of Member Baziron's fine analysis, simply to note that at the level of the 'mere notes' there is more than enough going on for what in our case has been just on 20 years of reasonably regular and attentive listening.

We would also agree with Member Pace that the 7th, 11th, 12th and 13th symphonies are a different matter in being explicitly programmatic works, with descriptive titles for the movements and in the last case also with a sung text. The wartime context is certainly an important part of the background for the 8th symphony. It is not in our opinion inherent to its material.

Perhaps a moment's reflection on Holst's The Planets (in particular Mars, of course) and Vaughan Williams' Sixth Symphony might be in order. Both exist in a wartime context. Both are also susceptible of understanding independently of it and their composers certainly preferred it that way.

Incidentally, I do hope I am not the Member Flaccid to whom Member ahinton alludes.
« Last Edit: 23:35:42, 06-05-2007 by oliver sudden » Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #470 on: 09:17:21, 07-05-2007 »

Sydney, it's clear that there is much you refuse to understand . . .

This is an error of logic. The concept of understanding is not in a category which admits of refusal or acceptance. Suppose we were to kick the Member's bum. He would not be in a position to cry "I refuse that kick!" would he?
Logged
Baziron
Guest
« Reply #471 on: 09:55:52, 07-05-2007 »

Sydney, it's clear that there is much you refuse to understand . . .

This is an error of logic. The concept of understanding is not in a category which admits of refusal or acceptance. Suppose we were to kick the Member's bum. He would not be in a position to cry "I refuse that kick!" would he?

It may be that Member Barrett was (as tactfully as possible) qualifying the term "ignorance" so as to draw a clear distinction between on the one hand "simply not knowing", and on the other "deliberately not wanting to know".

Member Grew's logic is, as ever, entirely sound however.

Baz
Logged
Reiner Torheit
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3391



WWW
« Reply #472 on: 21:50:15, 08-05-2007 »

Quote
But "war" is the least suitable subject for a work of Art
Monteverdi - 8th Book of Madrigals, Of Love & War
Verdi - La Forza Del Destino
Ullmann - The Emperor Of Atlantis
Anonymous, Beauvais, C13th - The Play Of Daniel (the wars between Belshazzar & Darius)
Tippett - King Priam
Sallinnen - The King Goes Forth To France

... war seems to have somehow inspired composers across the ages, the above just being a few works I have personal connections with.
Logged

"I was, for several months, mutely in love with a coloratura soprano, who seemed to me to have wafted straight from Paradise to the stage of the Odessa Opera-House"
-  Leon Trotsky, "My Life"
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #473 on: 09:28:27, 19-05-2007 »

Dimitry Shopstercowitz had three wives, no less. In this respect he was like Arnold Dolmetsch who also had three wives. Is there any known case of a composer having more than three wives? Surely this tells us something very important about the man and his music that has not hitherto been given the weight it should have been. Specifically we learn at once what really mattered to him in his scheme of things. We do not find him to have been a spiritual sort of person at all.
Logged
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« Reply #474 on: 11:36:07, 19-05-2007 »

Henry VIII was, apparently a composer, and he had six wives.  Roll Eyes
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #475 on: 11:43:46, 19-05-2007 »

Mr Sydney Grew
I was thinking about your post while doing other things in the house.
When I read about Janacek's life I was critical of him. I thought that it was not fair of him to put his wife through so much. I really disliked Janacek as a person after reading this book.

Now after listening to COTW on radio 3 and reading how he was locked in a loveless marriage I am more sympathetic. I can not say I understand him completely, but I am not so judgmental. They also talked about Janacek affair with another woman (a singer) that was public.

I understand your point of view, but I myself am moving away from my previous opinion on this matter.
I thing Berg also was not very loyal to his wife. I think this area is very difficult. I think we are tested in this life to the limit.
With regard to Shostakovich I think that he was married twice. His first wife died. I left the Sov Union while very young, but from what I know moral was not the strong factor there and in fact it was very loose with regard to beeing faithful in marrige. In that State religion was killed and moral notions were kind of fuzzy. 
« Last Edit: 12:44:19, 19-05-2007 by trained-pianist » Logged
richard barrett
Guest
« Reply #476 on: 12:09:28, 19-05-2007 »

We do not find him to have been a spiritual sort of person at all.

ping!

(sound of penny belatedly dropping in the empty echoing chambers of the Grew cranium)
« Last Edit: 12:11:37, 19-05-2007 by richard barrett » Logged
Peter Grimes
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 212



« Reply #477 on: 12:13:16, 19-05-2007 »

I believe a man may marry more than once and be a spiritual person.
Logged

"On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."
lovedaydewfall
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 66



« Reply #478 on: 18:05:56, 19-05-2007 »

Ian. I do have some views of course. But like Checkov in his plays, I don't judge people. Who ever speak has his point and is right. As a result of such a personality I change my views and wayver. I have contradictions in my character and I argue with myself. It is hard to make decisions with such an approach to everything.
I think it is the best not to hate anybody and anything. It is better to understand than to hate (this is my theory). However, I am inconsistent.

I know many songs by Muradeli, lovedaydewfall, but I don't know his symphonies. I think they should be melodious because he was good melody writer in his songs. Many songs are very memorable and moving. I am surprised people here know him.
He did make a career in composer union and was liked by the authorities. However, may be his time will come who knows. Do you know how many symphonies he has?    <<<<<<<<<////////////// Sorry, T-P, I don't know anything about Muradeli apart from the 4th Symphony. One could always try the internet - there's surely bound to be some website that would mention him. I (loveday-dewfall) have been away for a few weeks, so this reply will seem very late!
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #479 on: 19:37:55, 19-05-2007 »

Thank you lovedaydewfall for your post.
My computer came up with this site for Muradeli. I actually remember operetta vaguely.
http://home.wanadoo.nl/ovar/muradeli.htm
May be there was a movie made from that operetta, I am not sure. I was very little then. But I do remember an operetta Moscow Paris Moscow. May be I saw it on the tele.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 [32] 33 34 ... 43
  Print  
 
Jump to: