The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
13:25:31, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Why is the minidisc so popular?  (Read 839 times)
adastra
*
Posts: 13


« on: 13:37:35, 29-01-2008 »

After reading a few posts on this board, I get the impression that a lot of people seem to quite actively use mini discs. I was just wondering why this is the case?

Aren't CD's and MP3 (bit rate > 128Kbs) higher quality than Mini disc? I know that both are certainly more accessible. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this.
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #1 on: 13:55:07, 29-01-2008 »



Aren't CD's and MP3 (bit rate > 128Kbs) higher quality than Mini disc? I know that both are certainly more accessible. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

CD's should offer higher quality audio than minidiscs but Sony's ATRAC, especially in the more recent versions, is considerably superior to mp3, even at the same bit rate, to my ears. Mp3 at 128kbps is approximately the same audio quality as DAB at 192kbps. A minidisc recording made with a modern minidisc recorder will also have a wider effective dynamic range than one recorded directly to a CD-R recorder. This is because Sony use a higher quantization level and then noise shape down to 16 bit in preparation for the lossy encoding by ATRAC. CD-R recorders generally sample at 16 bit quantization to start with, though some combined HD/CD-R devices, such as the Alesis Masterlink 9600 permit sampling to hard disc at up to 96ksps with 24 bit quantization prior to editing and down-sampling with noise shaping and bit reduction to Red Book CD-Rs.

While we are at it, show me a CD-R recorder, or indeed a decent mp3 recorder which is as small as a top of range pocket minidisc recorder. The smallest reasonable quality mp3 recorder I know is the Zoom H2, and that is over twice the size of the smallest high quality minidisc recorder. That said, the Zoom H4 is much more versatile, and I have not used my pocket minidisc recorders since getting the H4 and H2 devices.

It's just occurred to me that the most recent 1GB minidisc recorders can save as PCM. If they also use 20 or 24 bit quantization with noise shaping to 16 bit, the result should beat that of a standard CD-R recorder on all counts.

(On spellchecking that, the spellchecker objected to "quantization" and suggested 'replacing' it with "quantization". How very strange. Wink)
« Last Edit: 14:31:44, 29-01-2008 by Bryn » Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #2 on: 14:00:06, 29-01-2008 »

When MD arrived, neither of the other options was available, though, starry one: the major advantages over cassette were pretty beneficial: longer running time; speed stability; smaller format; easier labelling; no tape stretching, shedding breaking or twisting; no bias, equalisation or dolby set-up issues; easy indexing and access; easily portable. At the time I was using virtually every recording medium other than DAT (but including PCM digital onto beta and VHS) and although the sound wasn't the highest of fi, it was more than acceptable, and cheap to run. Now most of my recording is done onto hard drive and thence to DVD, but always in wave formats - I really don't like mp3 at all, personally. My latest acquisition is a Zoom H2 recorder with a couple of 4GB SD cards, it will be used not only for live field recordings, but also linked to other sound equipment for ancilliary back-up, and never below 16/44.1.
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #3 on: 14:10:11, 29-01-2008 »

Thank goodness I held back from your ailing periodical's cajoling to take out a subscription. The new severe reduction in information in the Radio 3 listings is the last straw. Radio Times is no longer of any use to me. What a pity. It used to be a very handy publication. About time the name was changed. I will not buy the magazine in future.
My latest acquisition is a Zoom H2 recorder with a couple of 4GB SD cards, it will be used not only for live field recordings, but also linked to other sound equipment for ancilliary back-up, and never below 16/44.1.

Nor above 16/44.1 unless you want to waste card space, Ron. Reports of the internal noise levels make the use of 24 bit quantization, or 96k sampling more of a selling point than a useful option, I am advised. That said, there is the option of recording in a sort of 4 channel surround and then editing an burning to DTS 5.1 CD-R standard, which can then be played back via a player with its digital fed to the DTS decoder of a suitable surround amp.
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #4 on: 14:16:43, 29-01-2008 »

Erm, Bryn, your clipboard seems not to have been purged since your comment to snofrid at TOP Wink
Logged
Bryn
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3002



« Reply #5 on: 14:24:11, 29-01-2008 »

Erm, Bryn, your clipboard seems not to have been purged since your comment to snofrid at TOP Wink

How about now, Ron?
Logged
Ted Ryder
****
Posts: 274



« Reply #6 on: 14:44:34, 29-01-2008 »

 adastra
           I have been using the same minidisc player for 10 years, it has proved very easy to use, edit etc. The sound quality I find 1st class  It has allowed me to build a large library of wonderful perfomances at very low cost . I keep a generous suppy of new discs and although the day will come when W H Smith will stop stocking them I sure they will be for sale on ebay for sometime to come.
          Any other reason why I will continue to use minidiscs?  Well-- I haven't understood a word of the replies to your post. Oh well, no doubt the player will be worth taking along to the Antiques Road Show in a very few years! Grin
Logged

I've got to get down to Sidcup.
Stanley Stewart
*****
Posts: 1090


Well...it was 1935


« Reply #7 on: 20:03:27, 29-01-2008 »

  Thank you, Ted Ryder.    It is comforting to know that I'm not alone in the world of developing technology.

I, too, have used a Sony minidisc recorder for the past decade; only changing the machine for the convenience of acquiring a model with extended recording time facilities.   I also use a Sony DAT recorder but suspect that this will be seen on the Antiques Road Show before my MD recorder.   Wink
Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #8 on: 22:05:11, 29-01-2008 »

I've only just been alerted to this thread by a "friend" Cheesy

I love 'em! Especially Hi-MD, if you're only using a Net MD machine then you're missing out. The 1GB discs can record a little under 8 hours at Hi-SP - which makes them very versatile - or 94 mins uncompressed PCM.

I've got 2 MZ-RH1s



having bought a second one at the start of this month. Although they appear exactly the same, the newer one is far quicker at converting and transferring old SP and mono recordings to my PC - they've obviously improved the software actually within the recorder. This is the recorder you need really, as it does everything, but it might very well be the last model that Sony produces Cry

I've got 3 other portables and my oldest recorder is a MDS-JE520 which I bought just under 10 years ago. It doesn't get a lot of use these days but I am using to edit old recordings prior to transfer. It can only record SP or mono.



There are downsides though, such as Sony's very restrictive DRM system.

Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #9 on: 22:14:50, 29-01-2008 »

I keep a generous suppy of new discs and although the day will come when W H Smith will stop stocking them I sure they will be for sale on ebay for sometime to come.

Ted, have you tried http://www.discountdiscs.co.uk/?

I've got 1GB discs from them several times and they seem pretty reliable - and cheap as well, especially if you buy in bulk.
Logged
marbleflugel
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 918



WWW
« Reply #10 on: 22:40:06, 29-01-2008 »

Last year I did a low-fi small group recording on mini-disk and was very pleasantly surprised at the result. Although the technical issues here are new to me I might on the strength of this go and buy one-the only problem seems to be file conversion into mp3 etc-I am equally baffled as to why this hasnt been rendered as a product. Cheers for an enlightening discussion.
Logged

'...A  celebrity  is someone  who didn't get the attention they needed as an adult'

Arnold Brown
HtoHe
*****
Posts: 553


« Reply #11 on: 22:42:53, 29-01-2008 »

After reading a few posts on this board, I get the impression that a lot of people seem to quite actively use mini discs. I was just wondering why this is the case?

Aren't CD's and MP3 (bit rate > 128Kbs) higher quality than Mini disc? I know that both are certainly more accessible. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

I like the simplicity of minidisc, adastra.  I buy pre-recorded CDs but for making my own recordings I think it's hard to beat a machine that can get a whole opera, comedy series or serialised book on one tiny disc with acceptable playback quality.  I'm also quite lazy, so I probably haven't looked that deeply into alternatives.   I was actually quite disappointed when I asked about MP3 players and discovered just how little you get on the more affordable ones before you had to start deleting to make room for new stuff.  I suppose I could be more organised and back stuff up to my PC but I'm happy as I am picking up my MD Walkman and four or five discs from my (now quite large) collection of recordings when I go away for a few days.

Ted Ryder, you might find Wilkinson a bit better value than Smiths.  I get 10 Maxell discs for £7.99 and last time I saw them in Smiths (my local branch hasn't stocked them for some years) they were rather dearer than that.
Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #12 on: 22:56:53, 29-01-2008 »

Last year I did a low-fi small group recording on mini-disk and was very pleasantly surprised at the result. Although the technical issues here are new to me I might on the strength of this go and buy one-the only problem seems to be file conversion into mp3 etc-I am equally baffled as to why this hasnt been rendered as a product. Cheers for an enlightening discussion.

Sony only started to support mp3 playback with the MZ-RH10 (I believe) which was in the days when they were still trying to compete with ipods - and it was pretty poor.



(I've got one of those as well!)

The MZ-RH1 plays mp3s far better but conversion to mp3 is a problem and I haven't found an easy way to do it. I would import an ATRAC3plus recording from an MD as a WAV and then convert to mp3 using some other software but it's not ideal. The SonicStage software doesn't offer direct conversion to mp3.
Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #13 on: 23:14:11, 29-01-2008 »

Ted Ryder, you might find Wilkinson a bit better value than Smiths.  I get 10 Maxell discs for £7.99 and last time I saw them in Smiths (my local branch hasn't stocked them for some years) they were rather dearer than that.

That's pretty cheap H. I used to get Maxell from Richer Sounds for 79p but they put them up to 99p some time ago so I stopped buying them there. Tho I've never heard of Wilkinson.
Logged
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #14 on: 23:15:27, 29-01-2008 »

I've been reading this thread with interest, as someone who tends to use the MD player much less now that the iPod has arrived on the scene.  I tend to use my ageing, well-used Sony MZ-R500 for recording broadcasts (through the digital set-top box, as we have no decent FM or DAB reception in my corner of Brighton) and the results at single-play speed are excellent.  Despite what others have said here, at LP2 and LP4 the deterioration in sound quality is very noticeable, so no complete operas on a single disc for me.   The other benefit of MD is the apparent indestructibility of the player - it's a good few years old, it's been hauled around on trains, dropped a couple of times, looks distinctly the worse for wear but still works as new.  I doubt that the iPod will have the same resilience.

But for copying CDs, I'm afraid it's the iPod every time: the convenience of being able to carry 80gb of music around - especially on the daily commute - wins out (and AAC at 128kbps is pretty good, certainly compared with MP3) - which means I use the iPod much more.
Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to: