Stanley Stewart
|
|
« Reply #45 on: 16:34:37, 12-08-2008 » |
|
Ah, dear Mort, it doesn't get easier, believe me!
"My memory unfurls its lengthy scroll before me - I shudder, and I curse, but I do not efface the wistful lines." PUSHKIN
I was still intrigued by Tommo's clues on a film adaptation, based on a short story by Graham Greene. It stopped piddling down here, in York, so I went shopping and wandering round the shelves on auto-pilot, got fragmentary images of Dirk Bogarde - a rare TV appearance - in such a story, in the mid-80s. The location was Nice and Bogarde lived near Grasse with his partner, Tony Forwood. DB abhored TV but needed the money as Forwood was in the early stages of Parkinson's disease. On returning home, I got John Coldstream's fine biography of Bogarde off the shelves. He was committed to appear, in early 1986, in his own adaptation of Graham Greene's short story, 'May We Borrow Your Husband?'
"It is easy to see why Dirk seized on Greene's story with such relish. It is all about ambiguity, deception and jealously, with a pair of interior decorators 'borrowing' poor Poopy's bridegroom, and the novelist narrator, for his own motives, doing nothing to intervene. Had the young man taken on a wife 'as a blind or as a last desperate throw for normality?' Would everything have gone normally well, if some conjunction of the planets had not crossed their honeymoon with that hungry pair of hunters?' In the fiction, Greene leaves the 'borrowing' largely to the imagination. Dirk scripted a full-scale orgy, with shaven-headed leather boys in goggles, punks, topless girls, an obese Arab sprawled on a white sofa, another wearing hefty gold chains, an elderly man in yachting gear sporting heavy make-up and a long black wig, and 'lounging on arm of sofa a tall black man, immense height, naked but for cod-piece of cowrie shells, cuffs, high collar of same'....
'No one here you'd take back to tea with Granny,' was Dirk's summary of the assembly he imagined into life.
In due course, the teleplay was given a well publicised 22.00 hrs transmission. I'm now wondering whether an off-air video is now cluttering in the garage. It must have been an expensive production, although I'd quite forgotten all about it until I sensed a connection between Bogarde and Greene in the uninviting Tesco shelves!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IgnorantRockFan
|
|
« Reply #46 on: 23:03:17, 15-08-2008 » |
|
TV, not cinema, but here's something which absolutely positively definitely shouldn't be allowed: ITV to remake The Prisoner(The cutesy showbiz jargon in that article shouldn't be allowed either. "Skedded to air"? )
|
|
|
Logged
|
Allegro, ma non tanto
|
|
|
Andy D
|
|
« Reply #47 on: 00:06:56, 16-08-2008 » |
|
Quite agree IRF. Although I don't see The Prisoner in quite such a favourable light as I did when I was young, it still has quite a lot of nostalgic charm.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
richard barrett
|
|
« Reply #48 on: 00:08:37, 16-08-2008 » |
|
here's something which absolutely positively definitely shouldn't be allowed [...] "Skedded to air" Your post has brought me out in hives.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
George Garnett
|
|
« Reply #49 on: 00:20:34, 16-08-2008 » |
|
<looks forward to more bee-related adverts smiley>
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MabelJane
|
|
« Reply #50 on: 00:25:37, 16-08-2008 » |
|
George! Beehave yourself, honey. (Can't see any yet...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.
|
|
|
Morticia
|
|
« Reply #51 on: 08:36:41, 16-08-2008 » |
|
TV, not cinema, but here's something which absolutely positively definitely shouldn't be allowed: ITV to remake The Prisoner(The cutesy showbiz jargon in that article shouldn't be allowed either. "Skedded to air"? ) ARGGHHHH. This is a terrible idea! No, no, no, NO!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MabelJane
|
|
« Reply #52 on: 16:44:26, 16-08-2008 » |
|
Portmeirion added to its charm didn't it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.
|
|
|
Eruanto
|
|
« Reply #53 on: 12:28:30, 17-08-2008 » |
|
Indeed, indeed. Although, based on the few episodes I've seen, there's precious little charm going! The series still provides the village with its (possibly) biggest tourist draw.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set"
|
|
|
MabelJane
|
|
« Reply #54 on: 01:32:51, 20-08-2008 » |
|
I have to admit to being slightly disappointed at not being pursued by gigantic bouncing balls on the beach!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.
|
|
|
IgnorantRockFan
|
|
« Reply #55 on: 14:31:31, 20-08-2008 » |
|
I think Portmeirion missed a trick there. "Be chased by gigantic bouncing balls. Only £2 per escape attempt!"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Allegro, ma non tanto
|
|
|
perfect wagnerite
|
|
« Reply #56 on: 14:38:17, 21-08-2008 » |
|
# 35 Hi, Tommo. 'The Thirty Nine Steps' had two remakes. The original was directed by Hitchcock in 1935 but the subsequent remakes were directed by Ralph Thomas in 1959 (Kenneth More was Richard Hannay) and by Don Sharp in 1978. Robert Powell as Hannay.
And a third is now in prospect: this morning's Guardian reports that a new "feature-length adaptation" of Buchan's novel is to be the centrepiece of the BBC's Christmas schedule, and filming is about to start in Scotland. (It's in the print version but I can't find the story in the online version to link to)
|
|
|
Logged
|
At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
|
|
|
richard barrett
|
|
« Reply #57 on: 14:40:20, 21-08-2008 » |
|
And a third is now in prospect Don't people write good stories any more? I'm sure they do.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ruby2
|
|
« Reply #58 on: 14:54:10, 21-08-2008 » |
|
TV, not cinema, but here's something which absolutely positively definitely shouldn't be allowed: ITV to remake The Prisoner(The cutesy showbiz jargon in that article shouldn't be allowed either. "Skedded to air"? ) That's ITV for you. It should be banned, it doesn't add anything useful. My other half maintains that the Bill is still worthwhile but I can't see the point in it myself. Grrrr.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Two wrongs don't make a right. But three rights do make a left." - Rohan Candappa
|
|
|
Stanley Stewart
|
|
« Reply #59 on: 15:14:06, 21-08-2008 » |
|
# 56 Thanks, pw. The John Buchan estate must be delighted at this news and it obviously remains an enduring story. I still retain the sharp imagery of Hitchcock's original 1935 black and white version, particularly the climax at the London Palladium when the Memory Man is prompted to recite 'The 39 steps is a spy organisation...' as the villain (Godfrey Tearle) remains seated in a theatre Box - Hitch zooms in for a close-up on his missing finger.
Talking of the biter-bit, I almost ignored this thread with an an impatient, 'Oh, NO. Not another posting about the beach at Portmerion!' Last night, reading a biography of Alastair Sim - well, more hagiography perhaps - I had to laugh when I read that Sim and his wife, joined Christopher Fry and wife at one of their favourite holiday destinations, the Welsh village of Portmerion. That'll teach me not to be so stuffy!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|