The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
08:31:04, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Should children be forced to learn to read music?  (Read 2546 times)
Antheil
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 3206



« Reply #120 on: 19:03:10, 10-08-2008 »

Doesn't history suggest that it's quite as equally owned by extremists of any persuasion, be they on the right or left, or even in a religious field rather than a political one?

I don't agree. The British left used to be the handmaiden of Enlightenment values: from Welsh Methodists running the choirs

Hurrah! Let's hear it for the Welsh Methodists!  BBC Last Choir Standing, two of the four finalists are Welsh.  Never mind trying to sing Bohemian Rhapsody or Tamla, stick to Cwm Rhondda, Aberystwyth and Myfanwy.  Oh, and btw, the Welsh winning the first gold medal in the Olympics for GB.  One culture superior?

As you were.

Logged

Reality, sa molesworth 2, is so sordid it makes me shudder
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #121 on: 20:24:08, 10-08-2008 »

It's only really meaningful to compare cultures which exist in roughly equivalent stages of economic development. My beef with post-modernists is their frequent neglect of economics.
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #122 on: 20:24:51, 10-08-2008 »

Philidor, with great respect (not least for your sterling defence of civilised values in the face of tweedy onslaughts at TOP), I think you underestimate the willingness and ability of posters here to argue reasonably and in detail. This isn't the same place as TOP.
Logged

Green. Always green.
owain
**
Posts: 52


« Reply #123 on: 22:33:19, 10-08-2008 »

Who are you actually arguing with here, Philidor? Not one single contributor to this thread (and certainly not the "leftists") has so far agreed with the exclusion of musical notation from GCSE teaching.
Surely that it is not a mandatory requirement is not the same as exclusion?!  So the fact that people haven't agreed with this is, well, a straw man?
Logged
Philidor
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 146



WWW
« Reply #124 on: 05:27:43, 11-08-2008 »

as you reject the very notion of one culture being superior to another, it follows that there's little point in passing that cultural tradition from one generation to the next

This does not "follow" in the least. I am happy to discuss this subject but this devious pretence of yours that by constantly using words like "therefore", "ergo", "it follows" etc. you are actually establishing logical connections is extremely tiresome and makes discussion virtually impossible.

Oh dear. We are rubbing each other up the wrong way. I find your habit of saying you don't want to discuss something, then discussing it, slightly disconcerting but, hey, each to their own. You must be allowed to express yourself in your way, and me in mine.

I'm sorry you find my manner of expressing myself "highly disingenuous" "selective" "specious" "devious" and "extremely tiresome". I find your way of expressing yourself childish (all that flouncing! Get a grip sir!) arrogant, unfriendly and intellectually shallow. But we're both over the age of eighteen so there's no harm done is there? Me telling you on the internet that I find you childish, arrogant, unfriendly and intellectually shallow isn’t going to force you into the depths of depression? I certainly hope not. I suspect you rather enjoy the attention.  Cheesy

Philidor, with great respect (not least for your sterling defence of civilised values in the face of tweedy onslaughts at TOP), I think you underestimate the willingness and ability of posters here to argue reasonably and in detail. This isn't the same place as TOP.

Thanks! I've a weakness for poking UKIP members/fellow travelers with a stick. It’s all good clean fun. But you're completely wrong about my impression of this forum. It's so obviously packed with sharp, well-informed (and funny) people. That's why I thought linkage between the British left's retreat into relativist, obscurantist, mush, with the attack on teaching children to read a musical score, might fall on fertile ground. I still think it might, particularly should young Barrett stop running in and out of the thread like a housewife getting in the washing.
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #125 on: 06:20:20, 11-08-2008 »

I thought linkage between the British left's retreat into relativist, obscurantist, mush, with the attack on teaching children to read a musical score, might fall on fertile ground. I still think it might, particularly should young Barrett stop running in and out of the thread like a housewife getting in the washing.
So why don't you stop directing your answers exclusively at young Barrett and reply to some of my, or a couple of other people's, attempts to engage directly with your points? I'm more than interested in discussing the subject, and I think I've already said that I understand your thinking but disagree with your conclusions: I'm happy to expand on this, but I'm also eager for you to respond to my points about the level of generality at which you make the linkage between 'postmodernism' and 'relativism'.
Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
Philidor
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 146



WWW
« Reply #126 on: 07:33:56, 11-08-2008 »

I thought linkage between the British left's retreat into relativist, obscurantist, mush, with the attack on teaching children to read a musical score, might fall on fertile ground. I still think it might, particularly should young Barrett stop running in and out of the thread like a housewife getting in the washing.
So why don't you stop directing your answers exclusively at young Barrett and reply to some of my, or a couple of other people's, attempts to engage directly with your points? I'm more than interested in discussing the subject, and I think I've already said that I understand your thinking but disagree with your conclusions: I'm happy to expand on this, but I'm also eager for you to respond to my points about the level of generality at which you make the linkage between 'postmodernism' and 'relativism'.

Roger wilco. I would have done already if young Barrett hadn't been running about like Tigger. But when a chap's called "highly disingenuous" "selective" "specious" "devious" and "extremely tiresome" by a childish, arrogant, unfriendly and intellectually shallow poster he's got to respond, or Tigger feels he's free to bounce about.
Logged
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #127 on: 09:04:46, 11-08-2008 »


Roger wilco.

Good. When you're ready then.  Roll Eyes
Logged

Green. Always green.
Don Basilio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2682


Era solo un mio sospetto


« Reply #128 on: 09:22:06, 11-08-2008 »

Gosh, I'm really sorry to see all this.  Richard may have appeared unfriendly to you Phil, but on the evidence of posts here he is certainly not childish, arrogant or intellectually shallow.  Believe me.

And I don't think you are devious: quite the reverse, if anything.

Please, please folks cool it.

(Relativism in education is no doubt an issue, but the mentality behind its more sentimental and uncritical manifestations can be called "liberal" rather than "left".  And your identification of the "right" with education as producing wage slaves is not fair to pre-Thatcherite Torys.  If a chap was bright enough to understand Greek, Theology, Philosophy, or Anglo Saxon, then he should be given a scholarship.  He would do sod all towards the emancipation of the working classes at All Souls, but the approach was not as philistine as you suggest.)
Logged

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven.
A time to weep, and a time to laugh: a time to mourn, and a time to dance
Philidor
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 146



WWW
« Reply #129 on: 09:36:46, 11-08-2008 »

Gosh, I'm really sorry to see all this.  Richard may have appeared unfriendly to you Phil, but on the evidence of posts here he is certainly not childish, arrogant or intellectually shallow.  Believe me.

And I don't think you are devious: quite the reverse, if anything.

Please, please folks cool it.

Nice of you to be concerned, but I'm sure things are fine. Just a bit of mutual internet willy-waving. I could have been more tactful, so it's partly my fault. Apologies.
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #130 on: 10:28:06, 11-08-2008 »

Who are you actually arguing with here, Philidor? Not one single contributor to this thread (and certainly not the "leftists") has so far agreed with the exclusion of musical notation from GCSE teaching.
Surely that it is not a mandatory requirement is not the same as exclusion?!  So the fact that people haven't agreed with this is, well, a straw man?
Sorry if that wasn't clear. I wasn't making the distinction, and I assume others weren't either. I feel strongly that learning notation should be mandatory at GCSE level. Given the restriction in teaching hours, making something non-essential probably comes to the same thing as excluding it, I'd have thought.
Logged
Peter Grimes
***
Gender: Male
Posts: 212



« Reply #131 on: 10:50:19, 11-08-2008 »

Quote
As I said I am not interested in taking part in this argument
Logged

"On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."
George Garnett
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3855



« Reply #132 on: 11:00:52, 11-08-2008 »

As I understood it the original article was saying that while learning notation was still an integral part of the GCSE syllabus, it was nonetheless possible to pass (and indeed even get an A) by carefully avoiding the questions that required it and doing extremely well in the remainder. It nonetheless seems a rather perverse way for anyone to go about getting a Grade A.

I suppose in a way that isn't totally different from, say, trying to get by in GCSE English by not reading one of the set books but doing brilliantly on the questions on another. But it does mean that knowing the musical notation part of the course isn't a necessary condition for a top mark   - which I assume it used to be(?).  
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #133 on: 11:02:06, 11-08-2008 »

Things are a tad bogged down here now, but thanks to burning dog, we now have a poll where you can answer the original question directly.
Logged
George Garnett
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3855



« Reply #134 on: 11:08:09, 11-08-2008 »

Oh <hh-type-sniff> Cry Kiss

« Last Edit: 11:11:40, 11-08-2008 by George Garnett » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11
  Print  
 
Jump to: