lawyers do so in order to remove any interpretative ambiguity whatsoever
Could you give an example of that, Baz? I'm sure you're right, but I can't quite see how it would work ...
Two children of a close friend of mine had money willed to them (quite a lot!), but they lost exactly one-third of the amount expected because the person who drafted the will inserted a single comma!!!!!
The situation was as follows: "I hereby bequeath X-thousands pound to be shared between the children of A
, and B".
Now because at the time of draughting only son/daughter A had children, and also at the time of the person's death son/daughter B still did not have any children, the silly presence of this
damned comma allowed son/daughter B to challenge the will in a court of law, and actually WIN for himself/herself a third of the money that was intended only to be left to the children of this generation. The consequence was that each "legitimate" child inheritor received only one-third of the amount, while the remaining third was awarded to their uncle/aunt (just because of a damned comma in the will).
QED
Baz