John W
|
|
« on: 14:04:39, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Think of a favourite composer and chose just approximately 1 minute of his/her music that you feel displays that composer's mastery of his/her art, a finely crafted minute of music that you never tire of but which always reminds you that, here, is the genius of his/her music/orchestration/composition. It can be a short piece or a minute or so from a symphony or opera, anything about 1 minute duration. It will help, but not necessary, if you can share the glorious minute with the forum, via a link, via sendspace or point to an Amazon clip etc etc, or maybe show a page from a score. I'll kick this off with Edward Elgar, and choose a minute from Enigma Variations, variation no VII, which just happens to be about 1 minute long, apparently a musical expression of his friend Troyte. Starts with noisy timpani then swooping winds, brass, strings and a crashing climax, all skillfully fitted into a minute of music. This is a direct link to an mp3 file, about 1meg : Enigma variations: VIIJohn
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kittybriton
|
|
« Reply #1 on: 15:28:06, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Not quite what was intended, I fear. But on the right hand side of This Page (just under the Heath-Robinson machine), select "Address to a Haggis" then click the [ listen to ] button. Fair fa' your honest, sonsie face, Great chieftain o the puddin'-race! Aboon them a' ye tak your place, Painch, tripe, or thairm: Weel are ye wordy of a grace As lang's my arm.
The groaning trencher there ye fill, Your hurdies like a distant hill, Your pin wad help to mend a mill In time o need, While thro your pores the dews distil Like amber bead.
His knife see rustic Labour dight, An cut you up wi ready slight, Trenching your gushing entrails bright, Like onie ditch; And then, O what a glorious sight, Warm-reekin, rich!
Then, horn for horn, they stretch an strive: Deil tak the hindmost, on they drive, Till a' their weel-swall'd kytes belyve Are bent like drums; The auld Guidman, maist like to rive, 'Bethankit' hums. ...
Ye Pow'rs, wha mak mankind your care, And dish them out their bill o fare, Auld Scotland wants nae skinking ware That jaups in luggies: But, if ye wish her gratefu prayer, Gie her a Haggis!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Click me -> About meor me -> my handmade storeNo, I'm not a complete idiot. I'm only a halfwit. In fact I'm actually a catfish.
|
|
|
Ron Dough
|
|
« Reply #2 on: 17:20:13, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Sorry, John, but this strikes me as a rather pointless exercise, a bit like voting for a celebrity's best feature, although, interestingly, it may start to suggest why you have problems with much of the music that appeals to many here. Surely it's the apotheosis of CFM mentality: let's wallow in the 'best bits' and forget the rest. Music works horizontally as well as vertically: what happens and develops over time, and how a composer handles the structural and textural pacing of a piece can be quite as important - if not more - so than what happens at any given moment during it, and many 'great moments' are rather emasculated if divorced from their proper surroundings. It might work for miniatures and light music, but were I to select a minute from almost anything I love or admire, it would be at best a travesty of the composer's intentions.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sydney Grew
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: 17:46:40, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Think of a favourite composer and chose just approximately 1 minute of his/her music that you feel displays that composer's mastery of his/her art, a finely crafted minute of music that you never tire of but which always reminds you that, here, is the genius of his/her music/orchestration/composition.
Sorry, John, but this strikes me as a rather pointless exercise . . . It does not seem pointless to us at all. In fact a number of suitable passages at once spring to mind: part of the development of Beethoven's Third Symphony, part of the slow movement of Schumann's Second Symphony, the transition to the recapitulation of Brahms's First Symphony, a certain Bruckner Climax, one particular passage from Mozart's Fortieth, certain incomparable bits of Bach, the beginning of Schoenberg's Second Quartet, the second subject of Berg's Piano Sonata, and snatches from several other noteworthy composers! We have prepared precisely such combinations and compilations for friends in the past. The real problems here are: 1) it is a frightful fag to upload the excerpts, especially given that 2) once uploaded we have little confidence that they will remain for very long; 3) and there is little likelihood that more than one or two or indeed any other Members will recognise or appreciate the qualities we so much admire. If we may suggest a partial solution: is there an area in R 2OK which is open to all comers Mr. W.? To be able to upload all these proposed excellent short excerpts to a single site would be a step in the right direction would it not? If Members send their chunks to Mr. W. could he collect them together we mean?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
richard barrett
|
|
« Reply #4 on: 18:50:53, 11-01-2008 » |
|
As Ron says, in much of the most powerfully expressive music, form and content are coextensive to the point that lopping off highlights gives a false impression not just of the whole but of the highlights themselves. It isn't that Beethoven, when writing his symphonies, had a few extra-good bits which he padded out with not-so-good bits. Every moment has an important contribution to the whole. While, if I'm listening to Beethoven's fifth symphony, I might be looking forward to say the transition to the finale as one of my "favourite" moments in the piece, if I were to fast forward to that point and just listen from there the effect would be destroyed completely. Even more so with Sydney's "Bruckner climax" - if you remove the buildup it isn't even a climax any more and makes little expressive impact and no structural sense. So, yes, not just a pointless exercise but one the suggestion of which certainly goes some way to explaining certain "blindspots".
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John W
|
|
« Reply #5 on: 19:51:18, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Ron, richard, geeez, it's just a bit of fun Members here have their favourite music and gaps in their listening - I won't call them blindspots so rather than pointless I'd hope this bit of fun brings bits of music to ears that have not heard it. Yeah 'everybody has heard' variation: VII, and you both may dismiss it as a brief exercise in light music but it's piece of brilliance and beauty to me. No matter how long a piece of music there's always a moment that grabs you; I just love imagining the composer actually writing down those moments, and, remember, often he/she will have composed them in his head totally separately from the rest of his symphony and then just fitted it together.You must admit that some works are created through such a process. Well, you don't need to play the game. As for my blindspots, not enjoying a tuneless/rhythmless piece of Braxton noise reminds me to stick to what I do enjoy which is just about everything else one can hear on Radio 3. John W
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John W
|
|
« Reply #6 on: 20:44:24, 11-01-2008 » |
|
It does not seem pointless to us at all. In fact a number of suitable passages at once spring to mind: part of the development of Beethoven's Third Symphony, part of the slow movement of Schumann's Second Symphony, the .........
Thank you Sydney. There are some good musical moments to share. Maybe richard/ron fear a few sniggers if they were to place some brilliant moments of new music here is there an area in R2OK which is open to all comers Mr. W.? ..... If Members send their chunks to Mr. W. could he collect them together we mean?
That option is possible. The site has about 10MB free at the moment, and at a small cost ( not to members) that could become 70MB. About a minute of mp3 can occupy about 1MB so there is room at this time for 10 pieces of music (more available if necessary). They can be e-mailed to me and can then be played directly from links on this thread. John the link to a soundfile would be as http://www.r2ok.co.uk/filename.mp3
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oliver sudden
|
|
« Reply #7 on: 20:51:51, 11-01-2008 » |
|
I was going to nominate the passage beginning at bar 300 of the second movement of a certain member's three-movement orchestral work but I realise this might be a bad time... All the same, while I wouldn't go quite as far as Richard and Ron, there indeed wouldn't be much point posting a minute or so from a work members wouldn't know the rest of. Whereas the moments which spring to my mind, whatever the repertoire, although they might be a particularly favoured corner of a painting (so to speak) do very much need the rest of the canvas. I wonder what someone who didn't know Beethoven's Eroica at all would make of its (many) highlights? (A minute is an interesting span of time isn't it? Most of the "moments" I can think of are just a few seconds in duration - a single, completely appropriate, chord or phrase. On the other hand the longer spans which have sprung to my mind are usually 3-4 minutes long...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John W
|
|
« Reply #8 on: 20:58:41, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Ollie,
The whole point is to encourage members to go and seek the full works as it's impractical for us to listen to full works everytime we read a message on this thread. I'm just suggesting we can play moments of brilliance and then see what else there is by seeking out recordings, bit like Building A Libraryon R3.
Ignore my mischeivous comment before, let's hear a glorious minute of anyone's work!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ahinton
|
|
« Reply #9 on: 21:05:12, 11-01-2008 » |
|
As Ron says, in much of the most powerfully expressive music, form and content are coextensive to the point that lopping off highlights gives a false impression not just of the whole but of the highlights themselves. It isn't that Beethoven, when writing his symphonies, had a few extra-good bits which he padded out with not-so-good bits. Every moment has an important contribution to the whole. While, if I'm listening to Beethoven's fifth symphony, I might be looking forward to say the transition to the finale as one of my "favourite" moments in the piece, if I were to fast forward to that point and just listen from there the effect would be destroyed completely. Even more so with Sydney's "Bruckner climax" - if you remove the buildup it isn't even a climax any more and makes little expressive impact and no structural sense. So, yes, not just a pointless exercise but one the suggestion of which certainly goes some way to explaining certain "blindspots".
Such a wealth (if you'll pardon the expression!) of excellent good sense, Richard - for which very many thanks! Yes - just imagine (since we're onto Fifth Symphonies) those climactic moments in Bruckner's without every little detail of preparation; of course they would and could make no sense whatsoever other than as integral and inevitable parts of the entire experience. As to my own "finest minute" - well, I confess that I just don't have one - at least by comparison to so many others' "finest minutes" - and may never have one, unfortunately... Best, Alistair
|
|
« Last Edit: 09:10:29, 12-01-2008 by ahinton »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MabelJane
|
|
« Reply #10 on: 21:14:27, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Since so many people object to a selection of a finest minute, how about Composer! Your finest minuet!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative.
|
|
|
John W
|
|
« Reply #11 on: 21:16:47, 11-01-2008 » |
|
those climactic moments in Bruckner's without every little detail of preparation; of course they would and could make no sense whatsoever other than as integral and inevitable parts of the entire experience. The fine minute of brilliance does not have to make total sense, in fact if there is 15 minutes of preparation then that is something to look for in the full work. It's odd that when a new thread/idea is proposed we get more responses from people who don't want to do it. Well then, the thread was addressed to people who DO want to do it. OK? As to my own "finest minute" - well, I confess that I just don't have one - at least by comparison to so many others' "finest minutes" - and may never have one, unfortunately...
But Alistair, the aim is NOT to compare one composer's minute with Elgar's variation:VII or a few bars of Bach, just to let members hear something they may not have heard before. John W
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oliver sudden
|
|
« Reply #12 on: 21:43:28, 11-01-2008 » |
|
OK then: the passage beginning at bar 300 of the second movement (Memento) of Richard Barrett's Vanity. A 48-part chord in quarter-tones covering six octaves. Entirely squashes the harmonic argument of course but is a particularly sensuous moment, especially when the chord is taken apart and transformed, as it were so many blocks.
And then there's the very end of the Mozart oboe quartet, starting at the upbeat to bar 165. A little throwaway 4-bar theme that seems to have the whole piece distilled within it. Anyone else feel that way?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John W
|
|
« Reply #13 on: 22:10:10, 11-01-2008 » |
|
Ollie, I'm not familiar with richard's Memento movement. I can tell you, though, that I share your admiration for Mozart's Oboe Quartet, particularly that last minute and here it is OboeQuartet: endSteven Hammer, oboe, with members of The Academy of Ancient Music. Not my favourite recording, I still prefer the first version I ever bought on a CFP LP, oboeist Ian Wilson.
|
|
« Last Edit: 22:19:43, 11-01-2008 by John W »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oliver sudden
|
|
« Reply #14 on: 22:13:11, 11-01-2008 » |
|
I find it interesting that the Strauss oboe concerto has a similar ending moment. Don't have a score to hand (and I'm multitasking so can't post a snippet)... anyone know that one too? I wonder if Strauss did it with the Mozart in mind?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|