The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
04:52:57, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: Peter Maxwell Davies - A case for classical music, old and new  (Read 1839 times)
chakgogka
Guest
« Reply #45 on: 09:02:24, 08-05-2007 »

Quote
Erm - and the connection with Peter Maxwell Davies - A case for classical music, old and new is......

Oh well, at the risk of supplying my own highly subjective interpretation of the thread so far, here goes:
1. Max said that loud repetitive music is even more insidious than the propaganda of Goebbels and Lenin -->
2. Probably referring to a type of music  associated with the clubbing scene where people "lose their individual identity" -->
3.  Which lead to a discussion of whether or not people really do lose their identity in this 'insidious' way (or perhaps 'compartmentalise' their lives in some ways - preferring different kinds of music at different times and for different purposes) -->
4. Which lead to an interesting analogy to the way that people can separate their 'essential' selves from the roles they play in certain other 'scenes' - the relevance being, if one needs to be snatched out of a hat, that - particularly in the area of popular music - there is a huge crossover between musical taste and lifestyle or, as someone expressed it better than me:
Quote
this "case" is arguably incapable of thorough discussion without any reference to those things that he said

and that this analogy is
Quote
exactly the sort of post we need from [Ian]. Provocative, yet informative...

On reflection though I can see that some people genuinely do find this sort of thing a distasteful intrusion - hard as I find it to sympathise with that myself - and a previous suggestion of a wider 'music and society' section might not be a bad idea. (We would, of course, still have the issue of a certain type of censorship in the other sections, but perhaps that can't be helped...)



« Last Edit: 09:44:58, 08-05-2007 by chakgogka » Logged
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« Reply #46 on: 10:14:04, 08-05-2007 »

Thank you chakgogka. The answers to your implied questions are contained in your own message.

.....I live in a different mental universe,
.....I fail to see what was so objectionable
.....Your forum, your rules: fair enough
.....you are imposing your own arbitrary social, moral and political values on the rest of us (which, of course, is a privilege that having your own forum automatically grants you).
.....I will reluctantly have to agree with the moderator's strictures

Any comment on Julian Lloyd Webber's article? Notice he does not mention Radio 3  Roll Eyes

John W
Logged
ahinton
*****
Posts: 1543


WWW
« Reply #47 on: 10:39:29, 08-05-2007 »

Erm - and the connection with Peter Maxwell Davies - A case for classical music, old and new is......
Oh well, at the risk of supplying my own highly subjective interpretation of the thread so far, here goes:
1. Max said that loud repetitive music is even more insidious than the propaganda of Goebbels and Lenin -->
2. Probably referring to a type of music  associated with the clubbing scene where people "lose their individual identity" -->
3.  Which lead to a discussion of whether or not people really do lose their identity in this 'insidious' way (or perhaps 'compartmentalise' their lives in some ways - preferring different kinds of music at different times and for different purposes) -->
4. Which lead to an interesting analogy to the way that people can separate their 'essential' selves from the roles they play in certain other 'scenes' - the relevance being, if one needs to be snatched out of a hat, that - particularly in the area of popular music - there is a huge crossover between musical taste and lifestyle or, as someone expressed it better than me:
this "case" is arguably incapable of thorough discussion without any reference to those things that he said
Yes, this was indeed is what I myself wrote but, whilst still sticking to it now, I would nevertheless urge a sense of proportion rather than the taking of one relatively small aspect of what PMD said and running with it to other matters best discussed in another thread altogether; by this I mean to refer to the principal thrust of PMD's speech, which is what I had understood to have initiated this thread in the first place.

On reflection though I can see that some people genuinely do find this sort of thing a distasteful intrusion - hard as I find it to sympathise with that myself - and a previous suggestion of a wider 'music and society' section might not be a bad idea. (We would, of course, still have the issue of a certain type of censorship in the other sections, but perhaps that can't be helped...)
It's not for me to say one way or the other about whether other members here found there to have been a "distasteful intrusion" earlier during the course of this thread, for other people's "tastes" are their own prerogative and concern; what I will say, however, is that my own concerns were not about "taste" - good, bad or indifferent - but about proportion, perspective and extent of relevance. PMD's speech centred largely around the current state of - and future prospects for - what we loosely term "classical" music and was, after all, given to the ISM, is an organisation ostensibly dedicated to the profession of music.

Whether or not - or to what extent - a "'music and society' section might not be a bad idea" is another subject altogether.

Best,

Alistair
« Last Edit: 10:52:20, 08-05-2007 by ahinton » Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to: