I suspect it's all very shallow thinking. David Cameron is younger and more smiley than Gordon, Boris has been on Have I Got News for You and makes jokes. I'm sure that's how many people decide.
I have to disagree with you there Mary. This revolt amongst the voters wasn't about some bloke being funny on the telly or David Cameron being reasonably attractive.
This was an electorate thoroughly dissillusioned regarding the War we were dragged into by TB, the successor to TB who was not elected by anyone, the removal of the 10p tax band making the poor even poorer at the expense of the rich, the total disregard for the working class of the country by a party which, traditionally, should support and care for them. It's Champagne Socialism, oh, and TB (OK not now in office) spending £4m on his sixth property when first time buyers can't even get on the property ladder, the rapid inflation of food prices (OK, this is global) but when low earners have to pay more tax this really hits hard. Add the Pension crisis, the rising Council Tax, the pay to have your rubbish collected and other stealth taxes.
No, the Labour party are out of touch. They have no conception whatsover of the lives of the people it governs.
In Wales it's not so much a swing to the Tories but a swing to the Independents and the Lib Dems, which for the Valleys to reject Labour is quite amazing.
I agree with Don B that the party that dare not speak its name on here winning a seat sends a shudder down my spine.
P.S. I apologise from diverting from my normal dippy blonde foodie Nigel Slater groupie persona in a black sack dress and 9" heels but this Government has really got me angry.
I agree with you Anty for the most part - but it is worth remembering that the word used on numerous occasions by Boris Johnson to describe black children was exactly the one used by Enoch Powell in his "rivers of blood" speech, and one which the the unnamed party - whose leaders are despicable but not fools - would never use in public. The contention that Boris Johnson is not a fit person to be mayor of London should not be interpreted as support for New Labour.
I agree totally about New Labour. The 10p tax debacle is the last straw, especially since it affects those who are at the heart of Labour's traditional supporter base (Labour apparently telling its traditional supporters to go to hell in order to cut taxes in the suburbs) - but the real killer is the way in which house prices have been allowed to escalate, and now the inevitable bursting of the bubble. A society in which house prices increase to the point where those on twice the average income is needed to buy one is not, despite what Brown and Blair appear to think, a prosperous one. Neither is a society founded on consumer debt. One of the greatest con-tricks perpetrated by politicians and the media is to give the illusion of prosperity while the opposite is the reality - a society in which people get into debt to buy the latest toys, and which public services are increasingly run by private spivs who drive down costs and quality; a process of which Brown has managed with enthusiasm. Labour have at last been found out.
or are you all so Middle England with comfortable salaries/pensions that you really don't care about those who are poorer than you?
A lot of us are very middle England here, including me. I for one loathe New Labour, and am disgusted at all the mainstream political parties (I am fortunate to live in one of only three parliamentary constituencies in Britain where voting for the martle-coloured party I support has a real chance of electing an MP, so at least I have some hope of helping to lob the odd rock into the pool of free-market consensus come polling day). I also spend a lot of my time in mainland Europe, and see how the Social Democratic consensus in may of those countries has produced societies that appear to be more stable, more contented, less divided and with vastly better public services than Britain, which is - nominally at least, a richer country. But even there the media are selling New Labour Britain as a model of prosperity
Oh, and, finally, the bendy buses are going nowhere. Johnson can't afford to do otherwise. He wants to reduce the congestion charge takings, cut taxes and won't want to put fares up. In those circumstances, junking tens of millions of pounds worth of perfectly serviceable buses in pursuit of the pipe dream of a new Routemaster is not on the agenda, and never was. Making the bendy buses into an election issue was a breathtaking piece of cynicsm.