there are also opportunities for innovation and flexibility in the theatre/opera house
Then I wonder why they're hardly ever taken... practically every recent opera I've seen or heard comes over to me as
mired in the opera house rather than using it as a springboard for the imagination.
Unfortunately very few of the works you've listed have come my way, and as I rarely get to Germany I doubt there's much chance to see them "in performance". Is there a particular reason you've preferred EINSTEIN to the rest of the Glass output? I found it the most impenetrable of his pieces. I realise it was a list typed on-the-fly, so I am not picking holes... but is the absence of PMD in the list intentional or accidental? Or Sallinen?
Einstein on the Beach is at least as much Robert Wilson's work as it is Glass's; for example it doesn't use an orchestra (which I don't think Glass has much idea what to do with - his original ensemble of amplified winds and keyboards is so much better-suited to the music, which orchestration causes to sound like a series of accompaniments without a foreground). I might if I'd thought a bit longer have included some Maxwell Davies - I found
The Lighthouse extremely effective, though once again in a conventional sort of way. I would also have mentioned some of Robert Ashley's theatre pieces, particularly
El Aficionado. I'm completely ignorant of Sallinen's work, I'm afraid.
When you say the modern opera house can "stifle" innovation.. do you mean the technical set-up, or the institutionalised nature of the way such places are managed, or possibly that the public that patronises opera-theatres acts as a dead-weight in that respect? Do you think it must always be so?
I think I mean all of the above, and probably more. Perhaps it doesn't always have to be so, and perhaps this comes down largely to money, but my ideal music-theatre would be something that can tour and be set up relatively easily in a wide variety of spaces, using more or less the kind of resources that a smallish theatre company would have. The space one performs in, and its associations, communicate strongly to the audience before they've even sat down. Personally I couldn't ever imagine working in either of the London houses and I don't like even having to enter them, and that goes for most of the (few) others I've been in. That's my problem, it might be said! but I'd be highly uncomfortable trying to say the kind of things I'd want music theatre to say in circumstances like that.
Have you had a chance to see any of the work Graham Vick has done with Birmingham City Opera? That probably represents "interactivity" at its most developed level.
No, so I'm still not really sure what you mean by interactivity in this context!