# 10 Back to back, George?
You may be familiar with The Best of Mike Nichols & Elaine May.
Oh indeed, Stanley,
and thank you for the reminder. Does the LP contain the sublime:
"George"
"Marcia"
"George"
"Marcia?"
"George"
"Marcia! Marcia!"
"George?
[etc....]
Er, you obviously have to hear how they do it
. But it's one of the most sublimely concise piece of skewering of human foibles that I know, just done by inflection of voices.
For those who don't know Nichols and May....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBBS1q3RJ4E&mode=related&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZNMYNuuVyA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17FXuYGfBaQIncidentally, I have now found the bit in
The Symposium that I was thinking of. It's the bit where Aristophanes is providing an explanation of the origin of love. The human race originally contained three sexes: male, female and hermaphrodite, but...
....each human being formed a complete whole, spherical, with back and ribs forming a circle. They had four hands, four legs, and two faces, on a circular neck, four ears, two set of gentials and everything else you would expect from the description so far...
Zeus later decides to divide each of them into two by slicing them down the middle and moving their faces and genitals round to the 'front'. These creatures from then on spend their lives trying to find their 'other half' to recreate their former wholeness, and test this out by embracing likely candidates that they feel attracted to.
Er, just a precis. It's much, much funnier when Aristophanes tells it, but then it would be.
The idea was that, if in embracing, a man-half chanced upon a woman-half, they could produce children and the race would increase. If a man chanced upon a man, they could get full satisfaction from another's company, then separate, get on with their work, and resume the business of life.
That is why we have our innate love of one another... We're all out looking for our 'other half'
Aristophanes then goes on to elaborate all combinations of what goes on and why between the various types: men who were originally half a full male, men who were originally half a hermaphrodite, women who were originally half a full woman and so on. It is very, very funny.
However....in the translation I've got, he never actually says "the beast with two backs" but I'm
sure that's what Shakespeare must be alluding to.