The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
12:27:53, 03-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Structure of this forum  (Read 1324 times)
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« on: 16:47:00, 27-03-2007 »

When the CotW topic was formed today (replacing Private Passions) there were other suggestions coming in.

For example the Popular Programmes on R3 don't get much talk on here, so do they deserve a whole section in the forum?

We have some boards with over 50 threads, with a wide range of topics, so it's difficult to put a structure to those boards, which means a lot of the threads get forgotten (they may have died naturally of course).

Suggestions on forum structure are welcome. This is a guide to what we have at present:

R3 BOARDS
Classical Music on Radio 3 (54 topics)
Popular Programming
- Breakfast with Rob Cowan (2 topics)
- Afternoon on Three (3 topics)
- In Tune (2 topics)
- Performance on Three (20 topics)

Specialist Programming
- The Early Music Show (9 topics)
- CD Review (7 topics)
- Music Matters (1 topic)
- Composer of the Week (4 topics)

Radio 3 Listeners' Discussions
- New Music (47 topics)
- Choral Music (13 topics)
- World Music (15 topic)
- Speech & Drama (23 topics)

General Radio 3 Discussion (59 topics)

MUSIC BOARDS
Classical Music on non-R3 programmes/stations (7 topics)
Opera House (50 topics)
Concert Hall (37 topics)
Music Appreciation
- Baroque Music (2 topics)
- Classical / Romantic (8 topics)
- 20th Century (16 topics)
- 21st Century (3 topics)
- Other (6 topics)


Jazz (26 topics)
Making Music (9 topics)

Collectors' Resource (31 topics)
Coffee Bar and News (80 topics)
Community Area (30 topics)
Logged
harmonyharmony
*****
Posts: 4080



WWW
« Reply #1 on: 19:33:02, 27-03-2007 »

This is my opinion...

R3 BOARDS
Classical Music on Radio 3
- Performance on Three
- Composer of the Week
Radio 3 Listener Discussions (incorporating what was General Radio 3 Discussion)
- New Music (incorporating the 21st Century child board from Music Appreciation)
- Early Music
- Choral Music
- World Music

MUSIC BOARDS
Classical Music on non-R3 programmes/stations
Opera House
Concert Hall
Music Appreciation
- Baroque Music
- Classical / Romantic
- 20th Century
Jazz
Making Music

COLLECTORS RESOURCE
CD Review
- The CD Exchange
- The Vinyl Knowledge Bank
Audio and HiFi Equipment
- DAB Radio
- Satellite
- Cable and Freeview Radio
PC Related Music
- Software related
- Hardware related

The rest I would leave the same.
Logged

'is this all we can do?'
anonymous student of the University of Berkeley, California quoted in H. Draper, 'The new student revolt' (New York: Grove Press, 1965)
http://www.myspace.com/itensemble
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #2 on: 11:24:09, 28-03-2007 »

John,

I don't envy you your task, as you aren't going to keep everyone happy.  I suppose you also need to beware 'tinkering' (will it just annoy everyone?) and 'wholesale changes' (will it just confuse everyone?).

My view of what to aim for (and perhaps you get there gradually?) is:

Welcome and Help Area
- Welcome
- Announcements and Suggestions
- Board Usage and Useful Links

Radio 3
- Classical Music on R3
   (able to have threads in its own right, but also with child boards of
   - Breakfast
   - CD Review
   - Performance on 3
   - Composer of the Week
- R3 Specialist Area
   (able to have threads in its own right, but also with child boards of
   - New Music
   - Early Music
   - Choral Music
   - World Music
   - Jazz
   - Drama and the Spoken Word
- R3 General  (Don't really like the word general, but people seem to have the idea that this is a place to discuss how R3 is run, and ideas for the future)

Music Boards
- The Opera House and Ballet
- The Concert Hall
- Music Appreciation and Making Music
   (able to have threads in its own right, but also with child boards of
   - New Music
   - 20th Century
   - Classical and Romantic
   - Baroque and Early Music
- Other Radio

Collectors
- Vinyl and CD Discussion and Exchange
- Equipment
   (able to have threads in its own right, but also with child boards of
   - Audio and Hi Fi
   - PC Hardware and Sofftware

General Chat
- Coffee Bar


I would dump
Classical Music Q and A - that can be covered by musical appreciation etc.
News and Current Affairs - that can just be threads in the coffee bar
Afternoon on 3 - that can just be threads in 'CMoR3'
In Tune - ditto
Music Matters - ditto

I have trouble with Jazz and Opera.  Jazz could be up a level from where I have put it.  Opera could also be a topic under CMoR3.

Anyway, hope it gives you some ideas, and look forward to a forthcoming poll.

Thanks

Tommo

[edit:  added 20th Century Music to Music Appreciation after Autoharp and Tim R-J's timely posts below]
« Last Edit: 13:15:26, 28-03-2007 by thompson1780 » Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #3 on: 12:59:17, 28-03-2007 »

'Ere Tommo ! What's your problem with 20th century music ?
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #4 on: 13:04:25, 28-03-2007 »

Yep, I think it's probably better to keep '20th Century' under Music Appreciation, and 'New Music' under the Radio 3 Discussions or whatever they're to be called. Having two 'New Music' boards under different 'mothers' is only going to confuse everyone. Seems fair enough to drop 21st Century from Music Appreciation, since people seem more inclined to post that sort of stuff under New Music.
Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #5 on: 13:05:46, 28-03-2007 »

oops!

no offence to anyone writing after 1899.  Could you add 20th century to my list please.

Tommo
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #6 on: 13:13:05, 28-03-2007 »

Actually, I'll go and edit my post

Tommo

[trundles off stage]
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« Reply #7 on: 13:17:11, 28-03-2007 »

Thanks for the suggestions so far.

Quote
I suppose you also need to beware 'tinkering' (will it just annoy everyone?)

I suppose there are few real complaints now, so most folk are happy with the structure and posting freely, so yes, tinkering may bother many people. So there may be a case to leave things alone, don't fix what ain't broke.

Maybe topics for In Tune, Music Matters, Ao3 etc should remain, to encourage more direct R3-prog discussion? Otherwise R3ok will end up just a complimentary sub-site to the BBC site? Is that what R3ok can only ever be in reality?  Undecided


Quote
Classical Music on R3, able to have threads in its own right, but also with child boards of

Yes, though some small screens/monitors don't always immediately make visible the threads under the child boards, and people forget to scroll down. That might just be a minority?


Quote
Opera could also be a topic under CMoR3.

Opera has 50 topics so it would seem to be deserving of it's own section?  Undecided


Quote
New music.... 20thC.... 21stC......

For me new music is not just any music written since 2000 or since 1960 or whatever, for me new music is the unconventional instrumentation and atonal music and noise art written since Huh and deserves  it's own section (going by the nr of topics) and I want to recognise there is a lot of music written recently that is more conventional in composition and needs a 20thC and 21stC banner to sit under maybe WITH new music but not AS new music.

Anyone know what I'm trying to say? I'll come up with examples if not. Cheesy


Quote
...... look forward to a forthcoming poll.

A poll might not be necessary as the options might be too copmplex. maybe thisthread can work out a good compromise, or we do nothing. If we do nothing then there is no harm done ?  Smiley

John W
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #8 on: 13:35:07, 28-03-2007 »

Quote
New music.... 20thC.... 21stC......
For me new music is not just any music written since 2000 or since 1960 or whatever, for me new music is the unconventional instrumentation and atonal music and noise art written since Huh and deserves  it's own section (going by the nr of topics) and I want to recognise there is a lot of music written recently that is more conventional in composition and needs a 20thC and 21stC banner to sit under maybe WITH new music but not AS new music.

Anyone know what I'm trying to say?

Indeed I do, John! Adorno said something similar - he said there was some music from the 1910s and 1920s that, unlike even the most radical 19th century music, would remain 'new' for ever. (He then got terribly disappointed with what the most apparently advanced composers were doing in the 50s and 60s and wrote a polemic called 'New Music is growing old', but that's another story ... Wink )

However, messageboarders (and even composers!) seem to resist such neat categorisations, and of course the dividing line isn't black and white in the first place (if I may be allowed to mix a metaphor for lunch ...). Indeed, one of the things that frequently gets discussed about both the kinds of contemporary music you mention is precisely the question of what in a given piece/style is 'new' and what's simply 'modern/21st century/whatever you want to call it'.

In practice, very little has been posted under 'Music Appreciation - 21st Century', while there are plenty of things under 'New Music' (on the R3 section of the board) that in theory ought to fit 'M.A. - 21st Century' better. So in practice, it seems to make sense to keep '20th Century' under Music Appreciation, while there'd be a strong argument for combining the current '21st Century' threads into the more inclusive R3ok 'New Music' section.

I'd be happy with that, anyway.
« Last Edit: 13:38:28, 28-03-2007 by time_is_now » Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #9 on: 13:44:48, 28-03-2007 »

and of course the dividing line isn't black and white in the first place




 Huh Huh Huh
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« Reply #10 on: 13:53:50, 28-03-2007 »

Phew! It's not just me then that can't make sense of it all  Grin

time_is_now,
I agree with much you've (and Adorno) said, and I suppose that very little has been posted under 'Music Appreciation - 21st Century' is because no-one has discussed anything non-new music written since 2001 (though some recent film music was discussed somewhere).

Ian, is your thin red line suggesting we are separating two things that are in fact the same??  Wink

I don't mind some near-empty topics, hoping discussions arise, after all this forum is only eight weeks old.

I am most curious, though, that there are R3 topics almost empty when the reason we formed this forum was because the BBC wiped out discussions about those particular programmes  Cheesy

John W
Logged
harmonyharmony
*****
Posts: 4080



WWW
« Reply #11 on: 14:35:31, 28-03-2007 »

Maybe topics for In Tune, Music Matters, Ao3 etc should remain, to encourage more direct R3-prog discussion? Otherwise R3ok will end up just a complimentary sub-site to the BBC site? Is that what R3ok can only ever be in reality?  Undecided
It's an awful lot more than that already, but are you saying that you would like to see this board as being in competition to the BBC's boards? I'm not sure that I like that idea. There's a long way between a complimentary board and a complimentary sub-site.
I post on a number of different fora, but this has become my principal 'home'.
If anything, at the moment I would say that the BBC's R3 boards have become a sub-site of this board (but I wouldn't say that very loudly).
By leaving those areas already covered by the BBC boards alone, we also keep up the pressure on the BBC to maintain some kind of message board.

I've always found the distinction between new music and non-new music to be inherently artificial, and while I see what you're saying, I just don't know if it helps anyone to distinguish them like that.
And anyway, why do we only have Baroque, Classical/Romantic, 20th Century, and 21st Century? What happened to everything pre-Baroque?
Logged

'is this all we can do?'
anonymous student of the University of Berkeley, California quoted in H. Draper, 'The new student revolt' (New York: Grove Press, 1965)
http://www.myspace.com/itensemble
John W
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3644


« Reply #12 on: 15:37:26, 28-03-2007 »

are you saying that you would like to see this board as being in competition to the BBC's boards? I'm not sure that I like that idea.

No that's not exactly my thinking. I still post on R3MB and see it currently as THE interface with the R3 presenters, but the presenters are having a hard time there and I think that WE would not be so harsh on them. I don't know of course, because we don't post enough opinion here about Rob Cowan, Sean Rafferty or Ian Burnside etc but I just have a feeling that we are all a bit more level-headed here and would welcome presenters posting HERE and we would give them the respect they deserve.

Quote
I would say that the BBC's R3 boards have become a sub-site of this board (but I wouldn't say that very loudly).

In terms of members and postings, for sure, and in terms of us being a community of listeners - though I know some prolific posters here seem to rarely listen to R3  Cheesy

Quote
By leaving those areas already covered by the BBC boards alone, we also keep up the pressure on the BBC to maintain some kind of message board.

I'm not sure that is the case. If the persistent negativity by posters continues at R3MB who knows how Roger W will react. As well as negativity about programmes and presenters, some posters there seem only happy to post about conductors they don't like, and musicians that they don't like, it's very disappointing.

Quote
I've always found the distinction between new music and non-new music to be inherently artificial, and while I see what you're saying, I just don't know if it helps anyone to distinguish them like that.

Well it certainly helps me to 'distinguish' the music. I see many new composer names appearing on here, I google and listen to clips but am mostly disappointed, and can't find recemtly composed music that I like  Wink

Quote
What happened to everything pre-Baroque?

If I remember, when we set up the current structure, there had been no postings about pre-Baroque other then relating to the Early Music Show which was given it's own topic.


John W
Logged
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #13 on: 16:58:50, 28-03-2007 »

I've always found the distinction between new music and non-new music to be inherently artificial, and while I see what you're saying, I just don't know if it helps anyone to distinguish them like that.

I agree hh. Also I can't see any reason to divide 20th from 21st century.

However you become very aware of what is "contemporary" (the word I prefer to use) and what isn't, when you have to apply to the Arts Council for funding for a "contemporary" concert. That's not to say that it's easy to draw a dividing line or even desirable for any other reason.

But this is only a forum and I don't think it matters a great deal whether you start a discussion about Schoenberg, for example, under contemporary or classical.
Logged
Tony Watson
Guest
« Reply #14 on: 17:31:24, 28-03-2007 »

I think there are too many categories. I would just have three:

Music on Radio 3 (much like the old CMoR3) - with no subcategories
Classical Music elsewhere - covering concerts you've been to, music matters in general, but again with no subcategories
Miscellaneous: waffle, quizzes, anything
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to: