The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
13:16:40, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 215 216 [217] 218 219 ... 573
  Print  
Author Topic: The Grumpy Old Rant Room  (Read 150226 times)
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #3240 on: 12:33:22, 04-10-2007 »

Brief rant that I often think about - why can't we teach philosophy in schools in the UK? Why, more widely, does philosophy have to be seen as the haven of the pretentious, outcast, disengaged, etc., etc.? I've for a long time found exploring, reading, contemplating serious philosophy a joy, a stimulant, and much more, and I'm sure many others would if they were introduced to it properly.

(I know many might point out that there are much more pressing issues in schools today, which I realise, but still the point remains - I've come across people from many other countries (not least from Eastern Europe) who have a solid grounding in a wide range of European philosophy, which was perfectly par for the course in their education. As with many things - if they can manage it, then so can we.)

I don't think there are more pressing issues at all - an understanding of philosophy seems to me to be absolutely essential to deciphering the world around us, and getting beyond the complacent assumptions that form the surface texture of life.  It is also, as you say, one of life's real pleasures (but then I did my degree in philosophy, so I would say that, wouldn't I  Grin).

As I've said here before, I think the establishment in this country (in its widest term) is deeply hostile to the sort of education that consists in equipping people to ask awkward questions about the world around them.  Ivan Illich described real education as growth in disciplined dissidence, but in England at least here is a whole history of people in positions of power and authority pontificating about what sort of education is "suitable" for those in less privileged parts of society - from Mr Gradgrind insisting that children are taught "the facts" to New Labour's City Academies.  Education in modern Britain is, it seems to me, about sitting children in uniform behind desks as a prelude to a working life in uniform behind desks. I recently re-read an essay by Tawney written in 1908 attacking the view that academic education should be limited to the few, and reflected that nothing really has changed.

The best educators are always asking their pupils philosophical questions (I think about my daughter's physics teacher, who grabs his class's attention by asking them how they know what he teaches them is true, and indeed how they know that he's the same person who taught them yesterday - and how this seems to do wonders for their motivation.  Sadly, as GCSEs approach, it's back to the cramming ....)

For a positive example, see

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6264378.stm

Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
Ruth Elleson
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 1204


« Reply #3241 on: 12:38:29, 04-10-2007 »

- does Amazon use Royal Mail, though? I'm sure their Marketplace sellers do.
Remember the news features about the poor posties laden down with Amazon parcels containing whichever new Harry Potter book had just come out?
Logged

Oft hat ein Seufzer, deiner Harf' entflossen,
Ein süßer, heiliger Akkord von dir
Den Himmel beßrer Zeiten mir erschlossen,
Du holde Kunst, ich danke dir dafür!
Baziron
Guest
« Reply #3242 on: 14:31:54, 04-10-2007 »

I'm fed up about the postal strike, however much it may be justified...

Never mind the Post Office striking! What about British Gas?! Today - the first day of the so-called postal strike - I actually received an item of post! The trouble was that it was from British Gas and dated 28 September 2007.

It informed me that they needed to undertake an inspection of my gas meter since they had no record of this having been done for 18 months. BUT (for God's sake!) they fail to realize that they carried out that very inspection on 24 September.

Furthermore, I had previously cancelled the inspection due on 19 September due to being away on holiday, and had moved it to 24th. Upon returning from holiday, I found a card left by the person who should NOT have come on 19th to say he had come.

Brings tears to the eyes.

Baz
Logged
time_is_now
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4653



« Reply #3243 on: 15:13:39, 04-10-2007 »

Furthermore, I had previously cancelled the inspection due on 19 September due to being away on holiday
Eughhh!!! Some people have no sense of balance whatsoever!
Logged

The city is a process which always veers away from the form envisaged and desired, ... whose revenge upon its architects and planners undoes every dream of mastery. It is [also] one of the sites where Dasein is assigned the impossible task of putting right what can never be put right. - Rob Lapsley
A
*****
Posts: 4808



« Reply #3244 on: 16:12:07, 04-10-2007 »

Looks pretty well balanced to me Tin...?

A
Logged

Well, there you are.
Baziron
Guest
« Reply #3245 on: 16:17:27, 04-10-2007 »

Looks pretty well balanced to me Tin...?

A

He's quite right A to signal a gross misuse of English (one that I had not noticed before posting) - indeed severe enough to put the inadequacies of both British Gas and the Post Office to shame.

My only wonder is that he did not post it on the "Pedantry" thread.

Baz
Logged
A
*****
Posts: 4808



« Reply #3246 on: 18:49:22, 04-10-2007 »

I thought he was saying it wasn't balanced Baz, they looked really nice around September I thought  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

A
Logged

Well, there you are.
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #3247 on: 20:27:28, 04-10-2007 »

GRUMP:

A's Avatar.  It gives me the heebeegeebees

Tommo
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #3248 on: 20:30:23, 04-10-2007 »

I agree, Tommo. It resembles one of my primary school teachers to the extent that every time I look at it I have to fight back the urge to hold up my hand and ask to be excused.  Wink
Logged

Green. Always green.
Morticia
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5788



« Reply #3249 on: 20:33:32, 04-10-2007 »

Careful lads, she`ll have you in detention with a hundred lines each  Grin Grin
Logged
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #3250 on: 20:34:27, 04-10-2007 »

Mort,

Don't get me excited.

Tommo
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
Morticia
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5788



« Reply #3251 on: 20:40:00, 04-10-2007 »

Hmm, sounds as though it`s too late, Tommo  Cheesy Cheesy
Logged
thompson1780
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3615



« Reply #3252 on: 20:56:18, 04-10-2007 »

OK, 100 lines it is then......

For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.
For the sake of my eyesight, I must not criticise A again.

Tommo  Shocked Embarrassed
Logged

Made by Thompson & son, at the Violin & c. the West end of St. Paul's Churchyard, LONDON
brassbandmaestro
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2216


The ties that bind


« Reply #3253 on: 21:05:50, 04-10-2007 »

Lines, I did a whole load of them at Prep school. Nver got the cane though. Mustve been really good then, by comparison!!
Logged
Morticia
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5788



« Reply #3254 on: 21:42:03, 04-10-2007 »

You great twit, Tommo !  Grin I meant it was too late because it sounded as though .....

VOICE OFF: Hole, shovel, stop digging Mort.

Anyway, good show Thompson, excellent work, fine handwriting. You are excused prep this evening. Now, Fillybream Minor, yes you boy !  Your dissected frog is an utter disgrace ......
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 215 216 [217] 218 219 ... 573
  Print  
 
Jump to: