Bryn
|
|
« Reply #540 on: 11:17:54, 20-11-2007 » |
|
I used to give blood regularly, but a little over a decade ago I had to fill in one of those forms about previous illnesses, operation, etc. I mentioned the repair of a depressed fracture of the skull I had had in 1977. Apparently the records where somewhat ambiguous on the issue of whether donor dura matter was used. As a result, my blood is no longer wanted.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HtoHe
|
|
« Reply #541 on: 11:18:40, 20-11-2007 » |
|
Flats are odd things, the sound proofing either works or it does not, modern flats tend to be best but is very much 'try and see'. It really depends on the flat. Newbuilds are notorious for having paper-thin walls, while conversions are notorious for lack of soundproofing of floors and ceilings, especially where wood or laminate flooring is involved. Mine is a newbuild (2005) and, like every other flat in the building, has laminate flooring in the living room and entrance hall - and I think I've been very lucky with soundproofing, on the whole. It might not be all down to luck, Ruth. When I moved back up North I rented a flat while I looked for somewhere I could afford to buy. Although it was built in 2000, the soundproofing was dreadful - you could hear the people downstairs (who were, thank heavens, very quiet and often away) switching the light on! I complained to the landlord whose pat response was that the flats complied with building regulations when they were built. I was told by the CAB, though, that they almost certainly wouldn't have complied with current building regs, which specifically included adequate soundproofing. I can't remember when the new regs came in but this site suggests it was 2003, which would mean your place would have come under the more stringent rules: http://www.londonsoundproofing.co.uk/PS I wrote this yesterday but the site just hung when I tried to post it. I was then unable to get into the site at any time between lunchtime and midnight; but the timings on here suggest messages were being posted during that time. Was I the only one who had this problem?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ron Dough
|
|
« Reply #542 on: 11:22:07, 20-11-2007 » |
|
I'm not aware of anybody else having had this difficulty, HtoHe, although problems with my ISP's server meant I had to log out and back in again a couple of times.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HtoHe
|
|
« Reply #543 on: 11:29:05, 20-11-2007 » |
|
I'm not aware of anybody else having had this difficulty, HtoHe, although problems with my ISP's server meant I had to log out and back in again a couple of times.
Thanks, Ron. I can't really justify re-booting (and re-setting all my work-related stuff) just to get into a messageboard. I should have thought about it after I'd finished work, though! I just assumed the board was down because I had no trouble getting into any other websites all day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
increpatio
|
|
« Reply #544 on: 19:23:54, 29-11-2007 » |
|
Provided I do what I've promised myself I'll do, tomorrow I'll be set on the course to joining the ranks of the unemployed. What a prospect, eh?!
(I'm very tempted to get an office job, just to spite those of you who caricature (possibly 'most') office-workers)
I'm not in particularly happy or sad about it. Indeed, prolonged efforts over the last few weeks to psychologise it have had no success whatsoever; I have no philosophy explaining why things have turned out why they have, merely the knowledge of the fact that things have turned out in this way, and I don't feel too bad about it at all. (Oddly enough, the first social 'concern' that came to mind is that my Egyptian soon-to-be relatives will think less of me for this. And what of that, eh?)
More seriously, I'm like 'Bloomin' 'ell; what'm I going to do now?' I recall something about teaching maths in inner-city NY somewhere for a year; that might be entertaining...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
martle
|
|
« Reply #545 on: 19:41:23, 29-11-2007 » |
|
Inky, is that a 'challenge' or an 'upset' or both? More of the former, I guess. And does this mean you're packing in your doctorate? Good luck. Major changes in the direction of one's life are never easy, I suppose. But you have so many obvious good qualities that I'm sure you'll find something fulfilling to occupy you, and perhaps a different (or differently prioritised) direction.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Green. Always green.
|
|
|
increpatio
|
|
« Reply #546 on: 19:47:47, 29-11-2007 » |
|
Inky, is that a 'challenge' or an 'upset' or both? More of the former, I guess. And does this mean you're packing in your doctorate?
Yeah, more the 'challenge'. And yeah, it does; though your choice of verb maybe implies more of an active roll than is, in fact there (the only active roll I'll play is in not deciding to hanging around long enough to get an M.A. really; no point in faffing about, right?)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
martle
|
|
« Reply #547 on: 19:54:12, 29-11-2007 » |
|
If you're almost there with the MA part (finishing over the summer?), I'd say stick it out, unless that life is so unpalatable that it really isn't worth it. If nothing else, if you have an MA and decide you were wrong to throw in the towel in the future, it'll be much easier to start again, somewhere else(?), than if you don't. But I'm guessing that's not how you see it right now!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Green. Always green.
|
|
|
trained-pianist
|
|
« Reply #548 on: 19:59:23, 29-11-2007 » |
|
ncrepatio, don't feel bad about not going to academia. With your background in math you will find many applications. You could do other M A (say as computer engineer). It is too hard to make it in academia and in the subject you have chosen. But if you go in less demanding areas and apply your knowledge you will succeed.
There are too much pressure in academia now with publications, teaching etc. If you go into office job you could after while get into another program if you really feel you want to do M A. In any case there is no need to feel like it is the end of your world. I went through too many of this kind of ends.
I don't like people in academia, because they are too snobish and too neurotic. You are much better off to stay away from that, have a job and interesting hobbies. The most important is not to feel bad now. So many times I resisted the change, but after I saw that it was for better.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
increpatio
|
|
« Reply #549 on: 20:09:16, 29-11-2007 » |
|
If you're almost there with the MA part (finishing over the summer?), I'd say stick it out, unless that life is so unpalatable that it really isn't worth it.
I could I guess; my supervisor even said he could write the bloody thing for me if it came to that, but that's not really the point. Yeah, my conscience can't stand much more of this me not being able to do my own work, don't know how I'd cope with that alternative. If nothing else, if you have an MA and decide you were wrong to throw in the towel in the future, it'll be much easier to start again, somewhere else(?), than if you don't. But I'm guessing that's not how you see it right now! You mean to do maths stuff elsewhere? Well, I'm not sure. I've never much given a damn about letters and qualifications in principle, and I don't intend to start doing so now. I can't see myself getting much more out of this now, and this combined with the aspect above really doesn't make continuing on seem like a reasonable choice. But we will see, tomorrow.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
increpatio
|
|
« Reply #550 on: 20:20:59, 29-11-2007 » |
|
ncrepatio, don't feel bad about not going to academia. With your background in math you will find many applications. You could do other M A (say as computer engineer). It is too hard to make it in academia and in the subject you have chosen. But if you go in less demanding areas and apply your knowledge you will succeed. Yeah, I have been thinking about that. I think I'll have to phrase it a little differently so it fits in with my philosophy Thanks for your other comments, as well as that one, t-p; I'll have to think about them a bit though; can't think of anything to say just at the moment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ron Dough
|
|
« Reply #551 on: 20:41:27, 29-11-2007 » |
|
inko,
Bearing in mind how long ago you first told us about this, you've had plenty of time to think it over, and I'm sure you're making the right decision. From what you've told us in passing, I'd assume that you've already had to face up to something of the same sort of decision in your private life, so I'm guessing that you know already that being comfortable with what's right for you is the most important thing. Good for you. I'm sure there'll be a period of adjustment, but I'm also sure that you'll almost never regret it - though you may have the odd twinge of the 'what if's?' occasionally. Be happy, inko, very best wishes,
Ron
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
trained-pianist
|
|
« Reply #552 on: 20:46:22, 29-11-2007 » |
|
I know many mathematicians that went into economics or even into phychology. On the whole I think it is better to stay away from academia. I find pressures are too much. I mean situation with pressure to publish is too much not only for oneself, but for the whole family. I find people in academia are snobish, neurotic etc. I much prefer simpler people now. On the other hand if you go into industry you can have less presure with no teaching and no pressure to publish four papers every four years. The whole thing with sending your papers to journals, there are fashions and if you research goes in direction that is not desired by who ever is in charge now it is absolutely horrid. The worse thing is that they have too many Ph, Ds now and they can throw people out and take others. I am glad we are at the end of this road now. I would not go this road if I knew how difficult it is.
The most important thing now is to know that things always work out to the best and not to resist. I only understood afterword that it was for the best. Believe inside that it is going to work out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baz
Guest
|
|
« Reply #553 on: 21:07:25, 29-11-2007 » |
|
I know many mathematicians that went into economics or even into phychology. On the whole I think it is better to stay away from academia. I find pressures are too much. I mean situation with pressure to publish is too much not only for oneself, but for the whole family. I find people in academia are snobish, neurotic etc. I much prefer simpler people now. On the other hand if you go into industry you can have less presure with no teaching and no pressure to publish four papers every four years. The whole thing with sending your papers to journals, there are fashions and if you research goes in direction that is not desired by who ever is in charge now it is absolutely horrid. The worse thing is that they have too many Ph, Ds now and they can throw people out and take others. I am glad we are at the end of this road now. I would not go this road if I knew how difficult it is.
The most important thing now is to know that things always work out to the best and not to resist. I only understood afterword that it was for the best. Believe inside that it is going to work out.
Wise words here from t-p! Let me give you my take on academe (after having done it for many years!): a) only go into it if you are utterly single-minded and ruthless b) always keep a "low profile" in the workplace c) never (but never!) make the mistake of implying that you are ever in a position by default to give tutorials to students, or to see them at will d) if you are ever asked to sit on a committee, reject the proposal as steadfastly as you can e) remain single (throughout your academic life!) f) in addition to staying single, completely eliminate (or at least minimize) any other commitments whatsoever outside your contract g) think of yourself as a kind of "monk" following the simplest of routines h) never (ever!) show the slightest outward aptitude for computers! Always go out of your way to demonstrate complete incompetence in their use - that way others will do it instead in the misplaced belief that "it will be easier and quicker" than teaching you how to do it i) only ever produce formal work (e.g. publications for RAEs) as and when they are required (that will enable you to do all the other important things you want to when you wish) j) keep examining duties down to an absolute minimum by proving (as best you can) that you are not sufficiently "specialist" in as many areas as you can get away with. If these simple rules are adhered to, an academic these days can manage to survive - albeit in isolation (both professionally and socially) - while only working for as little as 72 working hours per week (throughout the entire calendar year). I've been there - I've done it - it works! Baz
|
|
« Last Edit: 21:17:19, 29-11-2007 by Baz »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
increpatio
|
|
« Reply #554 on: 21:08:48, 29-11-2007 » |
|
Thanks for your reply Ron. From what you've told us in passing, I'd assume that you've already had to face up to something of the same sort of decision in your private life
Really? Because I've been almost totally 'work-obsessed' for the past six months or so.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|