The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:23:41, 03-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9
  Print  
Author Topic: Paul McCartney: honest composer or charlatan?  (Read 3768 times)
Tony Watson
Guest
« Reply #45 on: 10:55:30, 23-08-2007 »

I understood the phrase to mean that the Beatles were social only and that the music was of little importance. And so I wouldn't say that as far as Wagner was concerned it was purely a social thing and that the music was of little consequence.

And as for pop music, I was thinking of a comedy sketch on TV from the 1980s when pop videos were becoming more and more common. "Nice video, shame about the song" it was called and there was a lot of truth in it. A lot of pop music was sold at that time on the gimmickry of the video that went with it.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #46 on: 11:14:25, 23-08-2007 »

And as for pop music, I was thinking of a comedy sketch on TV from the 1980s when pop videos were becoming more and more common. "Nice video, shame about the song" it was called and there was a lot of truth in it.
I remember it well! - it was on Not the Nine O'Clock News. You can see it again here. (do you remember 'The Memory Kinda Lingers'? Wink ).

Quote
A lot of pop music was sold at that time on the gimmickry of the video that went with it.
Sure - I suppose one might ask why the pop video is any less important a genre, but then also whether those videos really were so 'nice'?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
roslynmuse
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1615



« Reply #47 on: 11:33:47, 23-08-2007 »

An observation - I come into connect with a fair number of teenagers - fewer than any teachers on here, no doubt, and less of a cross-section of social strata - but nonetheless I know from conversations with them that the significance of much of the MUSIC of pop culture (and I am the first to put my hand up and say I know little about the full range available) is only as important as the fashions and lifestyles that go with it - in some cases less so; the music has in effect become an accessory. I don't for a minute believe that Wagner, Sorabji, Brahms or Ferneyhough are accessories to any sort of bigger industry, whatever the social associations their music has, or is perceived to have (and I think it is worth flagging up that those associations are constantly changing and are probably quite different for each individual member of this board, say).

OK, there are people for whom going to the opera is an excuse to be seen (less now than 50 years ago?) and they have little interest in it, but I would imagine that those individuals are in a minority, and when they are there in any number it is as a result of corporate entertainment. Once I found myself stuck in the middle of such a bunch on a returned ticket and it felt like quite an alien experience - the music was a total mystery to them and they were living up to some imagined stereotype of concert going.

But my gut feeling is that even this is a different phenomenon to the pop culture package.

I'm not sure I've put that very clearly - maybe when there are holes picked in it I'll be able to fill in the gaps in my argument...  Sad
Logged
Swan_Knight
Temporary Restriction
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 428



« Reply #48 on: 11:56:17, 23-08-2007 »

Since the fifties, 'pop' has arguably been as much about lifestyle choice as it has about music.

The thing is, though, there has been no innovation in pop or rock music since the early seventies.  'Progressive' rock took the rock template about as far as it could be taken.  Everything that followed was just a variation on an existing style. John Lennon, in one of his very few perceptive comments, accurately described glam rock as 'rockabilly with lipstick' (or something like that).  And punk was nothing but a return to the demotic ethos of the skiffle days (anyone can play, you don't actually have to be any good, attitude and enthusiasm matter over ability, blah, blah, blah.) 

As to the Beatles, I think it's fair to say they owe a large part of their reputation to George Martin, who gave their records a sophistication that they wouldn't otherwise have had.  Personally, I think he could have legitimately claimed a co-writer's credit on a lot of their work.  Just imagine what Sergeant Pepper would have sounded like without his input.
Logged

...so flatterten lachend die Locken....
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #49 on: 12:09:54, 23-08-2007 »

For a few more rather funny video parodies, see this and this.
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
HtoHe
*****
Posts: 553


« Reply #50 on: 12:40:21, 23-08-2007 »


I don't for a minute believe that Wagner, Sorabji, Brahms or Ferneyhough are accessories to any sort of bigger industry, whatever the social associations their music has, or is perceived to have (and I think it is worth flagging up that those associations are constantly changing and are probably quite different for each individual member of this board, say).


You might be forgetting that members of boards like this are not typical of wider society, roslynmuse.  There is most certainly a type of person who espouses 'classical music' as a whole with, quite often, an appalling ignorance of the kind of music they claim to love.  And there is a huge industry based on selling to them:

http://www.whsmith.co.uk/whs/go.asp?Menu=Music&pagedef=/music/charts/classical_1.htm&promotion=music_slot6_classchart

As for teenagers, I'm sure there are plenty who blindly (or deafly?) claim to love the music that goes with their chosen image - there certainly were when I was a teenager; but I'm often surprised by the depth of knowledge some teenagers have of different kinds of popular music and of the history of that music.  I know people in their early twenties who could lose me in a discussion on The Beatles, Bob Dylan, The Velvet Underground etc - and leave me in no doubt about their genuine appreciation of those artists.  Artists like those were, of course, packaged and marketed commercially; but so were their vastly inferior contemporaries.  The teenagers of later generations don't seem to have much trouble working out which ones are worth remembering.


OK, there are people for whom going to the opera is an excuse to be seen (less now than 50 years ago?) and they have little interest in it .....But my gut feeling is that even this is a different phenomenon to the pop culture package.


I think you're right there.  I suspect that 'being seen' at prestgious venues is a far more conscious form of social posturing than just being drawn into an adolescent sub-group.  I've often seen people in corporate hospitality parties who not only know nothing about the music (or the sport etc) but quite clearly dislike it!


The thing is, though, there has been no innovation in pop or rock music since the early seventies.  'Progressive' rock took the rock template about as far as it could be taken.  Everything that followed was just a variation on an existing style.

I came to the conclusion in the 1970s that pop/rock had reached a dead end with bands like Pink Floyd basically failing to take the genre any further after 'The Dark Side of the Moon'.  When I'm obliged to listen to pop radio I'm often surprised not by how shocking & incomprehensible the music is (which would have been my parents' complaint) but by how familiar & stale it seems.  Probably it's got a lot to do with my age but I can't, for example, see much difference between the massive 'Rhythm 'n' Blues' sector and what we used to call 'Soul'.  I do, however, have limited experience of anything in the last 25 years so I'd hesitate to say "Everything that followed was just a variation on an existing style", Swan_Knight
Logged
roslynmuse
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1615



« Reply #51 on: 13:16:28, 23-08-2007 »


I don't for a minute believe that Wagner, Sorabji, Brahms or Ferneyhough are accessories to any sort of bigger industry, whatever the social associations their music has, or is perceived to have (and I think it is worth flagging up that those associations are constantly changing and are probably quite different for each individual member of this board, say).


You might be forgetting that members of boards like this are not typical of wider society, roslynmuse.  There is most certainly a type of person who espouses 'classical music' as a whole with, quite often, an appalling ignorance of the kind of music they claim to love.  And there is a huge industry based on selling to them:

http://www.whsmith.co.uk/whs/go.asp?Menu=Music&pagedef=/music/charts/classical_1.htm&promotion=music_slot6_classchart


Yes, I take your point here. Somehow I had blanked out that side of the market.  Wink (Wishful thinking...) I guess I was thinking more of the people who actually go to concerts or buy "real" CDs, and not the equivalent of the old "MfP hits of 1968..."
Logged
smittims
****
Posts: 258


« Reply #52 on: 09:14:36, 24-08-2007 »

Thank you roslynmuse for your reply#30 on the subject of melody,which I found very informative.
Logged
Reiner Torheit
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3391



WWW
« Reply #53 on: 09:52:59, 24-08-2007 »

There is most certainly a type of person who espouses 'classical music' as a whole with, quite often, an appalling ignorance of the kind of music they claim to love. 

Very true indeed!  The "Victorian values" mob are particularly keen on "classical music" for that reason... not that they actually ever listen to it of course, but it seems to epitomise some kind of stick-in-the-mud "worthiness" to them that they find comforting in their battle for the moral high ground in society.  This is nothing new, of course - British music in the C19th suffered most severely from the prescriptive moral nature of this same group.  This is why other countries can boast Wagner, Brahms, Liszt, Berlioz, and Verdi from the C19th,  whereas Britons shuffle their feet and trot-out Stainer, Parry and suchlike as the dull legacy of the same century in the UK.  I was involved in a discussion in another place in which a groupthink majority denied that the Holy Handel might have written an opera about an unworthy topic...  even Winton Dean's name was invoked as an "authority" that the opera in question was not about its own subject-matter!  And as you rightly mentioned, it subsequently became clear that not a single one of this groupthink gathering of moral guardians had heard a note of the piece in question (even though it had been broadcast live on R3 that week and was briefly available on Listen Again).

"Classical music" provides such society bores with material for self-important point-scoring... feeling themselves irrationally secure in the knowledge that none of those to whom they preach will know anything about classical music either.  It's unfortunate that R3 becomes a "football" in such debates...  with the group in question lauding the supposedly "Reithian" values they so greatly admire.  As usual, they are more concerned with how the music is announced than the music itself (which bores them and in which they have no interest).   It's the other side of the coin mentioned above, in which "music" in pop, metal or punk genres becomes a synecdoche for the lifestyle aspired to by those who like those genres, and in this way it is no different to them.
Logged

"I was, for several months, mutely in love with a coloratura soprano, who seemed to me to have wafted straight from Paradise to the stage of the Odessa Opera-House"
-  Leon Trotsky, "My Life"
perfect wagnerite
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1568



« Reply #54 on: 11:17:55, 24-08-2007 »

There is most certainly a type of person who espouses 'classical music' as a whole with, quite often, an appalling ignorance of the kind of music they claim to love. 

Very true indeed!  The "Victorian values" mob are particularly keen on "classical music" for that reason... not that they actually ever listen to it of course, but it seems to epitomise some kind of stick-in-the-mud "worthiness" to them that they find comforting in their battle for the moral high ground in society.  This is nothing new, of course - British music in the C19th suffered most severely from the prescriptive moral nature of this same group.  This is why other countries can boast Wagner, Brahms, Liszt, Berlioz, and Verdi from the C19th,  whereas Britons shuffle their feet and trot-out Stainer, Parry and suchlike as the dull legacy of the same century in the UK.  I was involved in a discussion in another place in which a groupthink majority denied that the Holy Handel might have written an opera about an unworthy topic...  even Winton Dean's name was invoked as an "authority" that the opera in question was not about its own subject-matter!  And as you rightly mentioned, it subsequently became clear that not a single one of this groupthink gathering of moral guardians had heard a note of the piece in question (even though it had been broadcast live on R3 that week and was briefly available on Listen Again).

"Classical music" provides such society bores with material for self-important point-scoring... feeling themselves irrationally secure in the knowledge that none of those to whom they preach will know anything about classical music either.  It's unfortunate that R3 becomes a "football" in such debates...  with the group in question lauding the supposedly "Reithian" values they so greatly admire.  As usual, they are more concerned with how the music is announced than the music itself (which bores them and in which they have no interest).   It's the other side of the coin mentioned above, in which "music" in pop, metal or punk genres becomes a synecdoche for the lifestyle aspired to by those who like those genres, and in this way it is no different to them.

From Bernard Shaw's Don Juan in Hell:

[Donna Anna has died and gone to Hell; she is outraged and determined to get back to Heaven.  The Devil and the Commendatore are trying to persuade her otherwise]

THE STATUE:  At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. Well, there is the same thing in Heaven.  A number of people sit there in glory, not because they are happy, but because they think they owe it to their position to be in Heaven.  They are almost all English.

THE DEVIL:  Yes: the Southerners give it up and join me just as you have done.  But the English really do not seem to know when they are thoroughly miserable.  An Englishman thinks he is moral when he is only uncomfortable.

 Smiley

Logged

At every one of these [classical] concerts in England you will find rows of weary people who are there, not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it. (Shaw, Don Juan in Hell)
Reiner Torheit
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 3391



WWW
« Reply #55 on: 11:26:32, 24-08-2007 »

 Grin  Grin  Grin    Thanks for that quote, PW Smiley
Logged

"I was, for several months, mutely in love with a coloratura soprano, who seemed to me to have wafted straight from Paradise to the stage of the Odessa Opera-House"
-  Leon Trotsky, "My Life"
Tony Watson
Guest
« Reply #56 on: 11:35:46, 24-08-2007 »

In a similar vein, there's the story of when Solti's Das Rheingold first appeared and was played to an audience made up of members from a Wagner appreciation society. Solti and Culshaw, the producer, were there and they fielded various questions from these enthusiasts, who were insisting on what they should have done and what should be done next. Then Solti asked how many of them intended to buy the recording, and very few hands went up.
« Last Edit: 11:41:33, 24-08-2007 by Tony Watson » Logged
smittims
****
Posts: 258


« Reply #57 on: 11:45:41, 24-08-2007 »

I've come across so few people who listen  to 'classical' music that I wasn't aware of this idea of pretending to be intererested in it as a social pose,though I believe this happens with opera..

 It certainly explains something that's always baffled me, that is why people who don't like 'classical' music refer to it as 'snobbish'.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #58 on: 11:57:53, 24-08-2007 »

The crudeness of the dichotomies set up in these sorts of debates is very familiar: music can be either (a) some sort of pious ritual, only for the worthy or (b) purely for entertainment, preferably with lots of cheap sensationalist tactics thrown in. Certainly in the UK little else seems to be considered viable. If (b) we might as well accept that the Three Tenors, Vanessa-Mae, Kennedy, Michael Nyman, Karl Jenkins, opera productions with plenty of tits and bums, Classic FM, and so on and so forth have succeeded as well as anyone else at doing so. In the UK, commonplace anti-intellectualism makes seriousness into little more than a middle-class affectation; but the situation was very different with Wagner, Brahms, Liszt, Berlioz and Verdi, all of whom were very serious about what they did, and all of whom were doing more than simply producing entertainment. And there are plenty of listeners to popular music for whom this is a very serious matter as well. As far as the debate being referred to, it can be found here. Actually quite a few people there do know Handel's Agrippina, and some including myself think there is rather more to it than the trashy plot (such as the refinement and sophistication of the music, the subtlety of the characterisation, and so on). Let's have a bit from 'La mia sorte fortunata':

« Last Edit: 22:24:32, 25-08-2007 by Ian Pace » Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
increpatio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2544


‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮


« Reply #59 on: 12:00:39, 24-08-2007 »

Actually quite a few people there do know Handel's Agripinna, and some including myself there is rather more to it than the trashy plot (such as the refinement and sophistication of the music, the subtlety of the characterisation, and so on).

The same could be said, to a much greater extent I imagine (though I am not in any way familiar with Handel's non-keyboard works yet) of Purcell's vocal works.
Logged

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9
  Print  
 
Jump to: