I have been listening to as many Schnittke symphonies as I could get my hands on as of late. As I've mentioned elsewhere, I find his first symphony to be absolutely hilarious in its polystylism. His second one, a mass of some sort, is quite lovely also I guess, but I didn't particularly get into it. The first movement of his third one I found to be very especially beautiful, the way he layers all the various lines with the occasional moment of cohesion; to me it comes across as a rather more serious & mature version of the first movement of his first symphony. I have also listened to his fifth and eight symphonies, but not actively enough yet that they have made any proper impressions.
I have to say that I find his orchestral work to be far more accessible than his work for solo piano (Berman has a CD of all (I think) of his works that I've had a quick listen to, but overall not gotten too much out of YET).
I remember liking his second cello sonata when I heard it played several years ago.
I have yet to listen properly to his concerti, nor his chamber works. Time, fellows!
Any thoughts on Schnittke's symphonies?
One finds no beauty in them.
One has the impression that he is making them up as he goes along, using ineffectual and ultimately unmemorable gestures from moment to moment, without any overarching plan. They are not organic wholes; hence they are unworthy candidates, really, for consideration as works of Art.
Hmmmm. I can say that personally I do not think this statement holds up to his third symphony or, in spite of everything, his first (and probably not the second, it being a rather orderly setting). I am not yet on intimate enough terms with the others to speak though.