The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
06:06:00, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
  Print  
Author Topic: A Liszt Thread  (Read 3943 times)
Jonathan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1473


Still Lisztening...


WWW
« Reply #15 on: 19:50:19, 10-06-2007 »

Hi All,
Interestingly, the Bagatelle sans tonalité was originally entitled Mephisto Waltz no.4 (before the 4th was composed and the piece gained the title by which we know it today).  It's in my newest volume of the NLE as well but I've not got around to trying it yet (earlier I played through a few odds and ends rather than my pieces I listed elseware)
Logged

Best regards,
Jonathan
*********************************************
"as the housefly of destiny collides with the windscreen of fate..."
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #16 on: 19:52:42, 10-06-2007 »

Hi All,
Interestingly, the Bagatelle sans tonalité was originally entitled Mephisto Waltz no.4 (before the 4th was composed and the piece gained the title by which we know it today).  It's in my newest volume of the NLE as well but I've not got around to trying it yet (earlier I played through a few odds and ends rather than my pieces I listed elseware)

I'll be interested to know whether you think it can really be described as sans tonalité or not - I hear it as predominantly in B minor Wink
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
FisherMartinJ
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 76



« Reply #17 on: 21:09:11, 10-06-2007 »

My 'quick view' of Liszt - he came up with many treasurable ideas but hardly ever seemed to work out what to do with them. In particular he never knew when to stop!

I'm not thinking so much of his big orchestral pieces as of short pieces such as songs. IMHO his setting of Uber allen Gipfeln is Ruh' is better than anyone's, until he repeats the last few words over and over again until we're (I'm) sick of them, and he's completely wrecked the poem (one of transcendent brevity and simplicity)!

I used to think that the end of Die Lorelei was the same. On record it always is, but live and sung by a gorgeous soprano voice, it is possible to want it to go on for ever. I speak from experience of hearing Kiri Te Kanawa do it. Not a great Lieder singer, not a great verbal communicator and therefore never going to be a great recitalist IMHO, but still, launched on that flood of tone she was indeed 'die Hexe Lorelei' for a few unforgettable minutes! ('Scuse me - cold shower needed...) But it never works on record, tho' I guess we can't blame Liszt for failing to forsee the effects of this technology.(*)

Returning to the point about too many repititions of the same idea, I reckon the piano music does this quite often too.

(*) Actually, I think this raises an interesting aesthetic point. High culture seems to demand that great works will stand a large amount of repetition, and not reveal all their secrets at first hearing. The other side of this coin is to do down any work that makes a massive impact 'first time up' but fades a little under closer scrutiny. And nothing helps 'close scrutiny' of musical works more than recordings, which has perhaps served to devalue still further the 'fireball'/ cataclysmic artist. Hasn't Liszt always fallen over this hurdle? I think this explains - partially at least - why he's never managed to be very academically respectable. And probably some of us here who don't dismiss him totally would stil be a little cautious about announcing 'Liszt is a great composer' among people we were trying to impress with our culture, wouldn't we? Does anyone else relate to this line of 'thinking'?? Undecided
« Last Edit: 18:18:29, 11-06-2007 by FisherMartinJ » Logged

'the poem made of rhubarb in the middle and the surround of bubonic marzipan'
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #18 on: 22:38:42, 10-06-2007 »

Quote
I'm not thinking so much of his big orchestral pieces as of short pieces such as songs. IMHO his setting of Uber allen Gipfeln is Ruh' is better than anyone's, until he repeats the last few words over and over again until we're (I'm) sick of them, and he's compltely wrecked the poem (one of transcendendent brevity and simplicity)!
Which other settings are you comparing to? I know Schubert, Schumann, Loewe, Zelter, Wolf, ...
The Schubert setting is pretty powerfulful and transcendendent.

« Last Edit: 22:41:58, 10-06-2007 by Chafing Dish » Logged
FisherMartinJ
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 76



« Reply #19 on: 23:34:49, 10-06-2007 »

Chafing Dish: I know the Schubert, Schumann and Loewe but not the Zelter. I should perhaps have said that L's is as good as anyone's - certainly it can seem absolutely perfect, but only until he starts shuffling disjointed fragments of the text, fragments, fragments of the text, disjointed fragments, frag-fragments disjointed of the of the text  usw usw! BAH!

Are you sure about Wolf? I know his Du der von dem Himmel bist but no setting of the other Wanderers Nachtlied.

Logged

'the poem made of rhubarb in the middle and the surround of bubonic marzipan'
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #20 on: 23:43:08, 10-06-2007 »

I am now as unsure about Wolf as I can be -- nope, no Wolf. Still, I know how his setting would be. Does that count as an excuse?

There's a nice analysis of the Schubert in comparison to the others in Thrasybulos Georgiades' Schubert, Musik und Lyrik. Göttingen 1967. He compares with Schumann, Zelter, Loewe, and concludes that Schubert's rendering was superior based on the unparalleled sensitivity to text -- no mention of Liszt, though, so perhaps this belongs in another thread. Except I don't intend to say much more on the topic, so... I'll get me yarmulke.

Georgiades' item was translated and appeared in a volume edited by Walter Frisch called Schubert: Critical and Analytical Studies (Lincoln: U. of Nebraska Press, 1986)
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #21 on: 00:07:12, 11-06-2007 »

Returuning to the point about too many repititions of the same idea, I reckon the piano music does this quite ofteen too.

Response deleted
« Last Edit: 02:36:25, 10-10-2007 by Ian Pace » Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
increpatio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2544


‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮


« Reply #22 on: 00:27:14, 11-06-2007 »

For the record, I would have to say I really very much love several of liszt's works for cello and piano; in particular La lugubre gondola (moreso than the solo version) and die zelle in nonnenwerth (I do not know the vocal version of which this is a transcription).

I remember being very impressed by the hyperion recording of his settings of spoken poetry to music.

Random comments, I know, are the devil.  When it comes down to it, I think the cello/piano works are the ones that have really moved me the most.
« Last Edit: 17:09:17, 11-06-2007 by increpatio » Logged

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮
Jonathan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1473


Still Lisztening...


WWW
« Reply #23 on: 13:05:01, 11-06-2007 »

Increpatio, I agree that the 'cello version of La Lugubre Gondola is really much more emotional than the solo piano version.

Incidentally, as I said elseware, I'm currently learning the fourth version of Die Zelle on Nannonwerth (subtitled Elegie) - but there are 7 in all, including all the chamber versions (cello and piano, violin and piano as well) and the original vocal version (which I've not heard yet either.)

Ian, I agree, the Bagatelle seems mostly in B minor to me as well!
Logged

Best regards,
Jonathan
*********************************************
"as the housefly of destiny collides with the windscreen of fate..."
increpatio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2544


‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮


« Reply #24 on: 17:08:46, 11-06-2007 »

I can't imagine liking the violin or vocal versions as much as the cello one (something about the quality of the repeated notes and the dip to lower registers that I don't think will be found in them); but I will have to try to track them down some time.  Heard the third version this morning (for piano solo); didn't find it as striking really.
Logged

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮
SusanDoris
****
Posts: 267



« Reply #25 on: 19:01:34, 15-06-2007 »

I love listening to the music of Liszt, although the reason I bought the CD of Arcadi Volodos playing Liszt was just because it was Volodos! However, I find that I cannot listen to a whole CD in one go. I think that is probably  because I find it too rich' ... can't think of a more appropriate word at the moment.
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #26 on: 19:11:39, 15-06-2007 »

SusanDoris,
What pieces of Liszt are on your CD? Is it only Liszt?
Logged
SusanDoris
****
Posts: 267



« Reply #27 on: 07:00:26, 16-06-2007 »

TP
Yes, it is all Liszt. 10 works (14 tracks)
Sony Classical  828768738023
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #28 on: 08:39:32, 16-06-2007 »

    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Album d'un voyageur, S 156: Book 1 - no 4, Vallée d'Obermann
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Années de pèlerinage, deuxième année, S 161 "Italie": no 2, Il penseroso
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Légendes (2) for Piano, S 175: no 1, St Francis of Assisi preaching
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Bagatelle ohne tonart for Piano, S 216a "Mephisto Waltz no 5"
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Hungarian Rhapsodies (19) for Piano, S 244: no 13 in A minor
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Années de pèlerinage, deuxième année, S 161 "Italie": no 1, Sposalizio
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Prelude "Weinen, Klagen..." (JS Bach) for Piano, S 179
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Harmonies poétiques et réligieuses, S 173: no 7, Funérailles
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): La lugubre gondola for Piano, S 200 (2nd version)
    * Franz Liszt (1811 - 1886): Nocturne for Piano, S 207 "En rêve"

SusanDoris,
Thank you for your post. I am considering to put this record on my wish list.
The program is interesting. There are more known pieces (Rhapsody) and less known pieces.
It looks good for me. I would like to broaden my understanding of Liszt. Out of the program I played  Gondola, but I don't know what edition and I don't know if it is the piece I played 100 years ago in my previous life.
May be I will put this Cd on my wish list. There are so many pianists to choose from and it is good to have several pianists playing the same piece.
From what I heard of Volodos I think I might like his performance. 
Logged
Jonathan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1473


Still Lisztening...


WWW
« Reply #29 on: 17:45:11, 16-06-2007 »

Hi All,
From what I have read in the papers and on-line, Volodos's Liszt CD is excellent - although I am restricting myself (nominally) to 1 CD a month at the moment I will certainly get it at some point in the future.  I have his first two CDs - at Carengie Hall and transcriptions abnd they are excellent and also well worth a listen (e.g. the transcription of the Scherzo from Tchaikovsky's 6th symphony by Feinberg is incredible).
Logged

Best regards,
Jonathan
*********************************************
"as the housefly of destiny collides with the windscreen of fate..."
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
  Print  
 
Jump to: