The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
17:03:26, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 104
  Print  
Author Topic: Two- to Sixty-second Repertoire Test Discussion  (Read 18090 times)
Baz
Guest
« Reply #540 on: 15:37:29, 16-02-2008 »

. . . Bach's D minor Prelude and Fugue BWV 539.

And no doubt you could also tell me from which work it is transcribed?

Not without looking in the book . . . where we find "adapted from violin sonata BWV 1001" (the Sonata number 1 in G minor that is). But now you mention it a dim recollection of attempting it on our youthful fiddle does indeed arise! Quadruple stops in places - very forced artificial and ugly - there is too much compromise in all those things for solo violin and cello is not there?


Well you are certainly correct with the piece - but not necessarily so with the description.

If you had tried it on an appropriate instrument (having the appropriate playing technique) and using a curved bow, you would have found the stoppings and positions an absolute doddle!

Here it is using a curved bow...

http://rapidshare.com/files/92355990/Bach_G_Minor_Sonata_BWV_1001__2_.mp3

IRON
« Last Edit: 15:41:36, 16-02-2008 by Baz » Logged
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #541 on: 15:42:03, 16-02-2008 »

A little clue towards Puzzle 80 - the composer is usually associated with the operatic repertory...

You'd have to be a bit of a wally not to spot him... Wink

Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
opilec
****
Posts: 474



« Reply #542 on: 16:27:14, 16-02-2008 »

Oh b_____ h___!!! I can't believe the number of answers IGI has pipped me to today! Angry
Logged
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #543 on: 16:30:22, 16-02-2008 »

Oh b_____ h___!!! I can't believe the number of answers IGI has pipped me to today! Angry

Especially the Janacek, I expect! I wonder which recording Baz used? Perhaps you can earn so bonus points for a correct identification?!

Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Tony Watson
Guest
« Reply #544 on: 16:33:49, 16-02-2008 »

So 80 was composed by Catalani, then? I can find three non-operatic works by him on the internet but I've never heard any of them.  Undecided
Logged
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #545 on: 16:35:44, 16-02-2008 »

So 80 was composed by Catalani, then? I can find three non-operatic works by him on the internet but I've never heard any of them.  Undecided

You'll be needing to spend some time thinking about it then, Tony.  Wink
« Last Edit: 18:35:51, 16-02-2008 by Il Grande Inquisitor » Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #546 on: 16:39:32, 16-02-2008 »

Reckon your Beethoven guess is a shooin, IGI. How many's that you've got today?  Shocked  Tongue
Logged

Green. Always green.
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #547 on: 16:44:53, 16-02-2008 »

That's six for today, I think! I've been a bit lucky with some of the Bach...



Now, Mr Grew's initial thoughts about No.93 could well be worth pursuing... Wink
Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
opilec
****
Posts: 474



« Reply #548 on: 16:47:58, 16-02-2008 »

Oh b_____ h___!!! I can't believe the number of answers IGI has pipped me to today! Angry

Especially the Janacek, I expect! I wonder which recording Baz used? Perhaps you can earn so bonus points for a correct identification?!


I don't just listen to Janacek, IGI! Tongue

And I don't just spend all my time on these boards! Wink
Logged
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #549 on: 18:56:48, 16-02-2008 »

IGI,

As no-one else has responded to your thoughtful clues may I hazard the following punt for no.80 - Contemplazione by Catalani.

As recorded here by Maestro Muti and the La Scala Phil...



It really is a delicious wallow!
Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Il Grande Inquisitor
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4665



« Reply #550 on: 20:16:43, 16-02-2008 »

No.101 sounds very much like Delius....just not any Delius I can recall!!
Logged

Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
Baz
Guest
« Reply #551 on: 20:28:23, 16-02-2008 »

No.101 sounds very much like Delius....just not any Delius I can recall!!

Interesting - especially because although it is not actually BY Delius there is a very significant Delius connection.

IRON
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #552 on: 07:36:45, 17-02-2008 »

Puzzle 89 - a clue:

Although it sounds (to me anyway) 'Schumannesque', it was composed by somebody who was not born until 8 years after the death of Schumann.

Baz
Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #553 on: 08:11:05, 17-02-2008 »

Puzzle 89 - a clue:

Although it sounds (to me anyway) 'Schumannesque', it was composed by somebody who was not born until 8 years after the death of Schumann.

Schumannesque to us too.

A reminder to Madame A that her puzzle 79 will expire later to-day. If she wants to have her bonus points now is the time to issue some strong hints!

The members' points table this time shows some quite spectacular rises does it not!

79 sounds like Brahms but is not;
85 sounds like Rachmannineff but is probably not;
89 as stated above sounds like Schumann but is we now presume by an Englishman;
93 we still think is Rachmannineff but still don't know what;
100 sounded like a Russian not of the first rank - perhaps Glezzooneff - but we expect Mr. Opilec is right;
102 may turn out to be a little more difficult than most of ours have in the past been; on the other hand it does seem to contain a nice clarinet part . . .

Is it not interesting that the period between 1880 and 1908 is the most popular among members?
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #554 on: 08:21:32, 17-02-2008 »

I wonder what reason there could logically be for presuming the composer of 89 to be English? It is highy unlikely since he was born in Munich and died in Garmisch (Upper Bavaria). There does not seem to be much 'Englishness' about the piano writing either.

Baz
« Last Edit: 08:27:29, 17-02-2008 by Baz » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 39 ... 104
  Print  
 
Jump to: