The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
17:04:13, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 104
  Print  
Author Topic: Two- to Sixty-second Repertoire Test Discussion  (Read 18090 times)
Andy D
*****
Posts: 3061



« Reply #750 on: 00:47:19, 24-02-2008 »

Man: Is this the right room for an argument?

Other Man: I've told you once.

Man: No you haven't!

Other Man: Yes I have.

Man: When?

Other Man: Just now.

Man: No you didn't!

Other Man: Yes I did!

Man: You didn't!

Other Man: I did!

Man: You didn't!

Other Man: I'm telling you, I did!

Man: You did not!

Other Man: Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?

Man: Ah!
(taking out his wallet and paying)
Just the five minutes.

Other Man: Just the five minutes. Thank you. Anyway, I did.

Man: You most certainly did not!

Other Man: Now let's get one thing quite clear: I most definitely told you!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh no you didn't!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: No you DIDN'T!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: No you DIDN'T!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: No you DIDN'T!

Other Man: Oh yes I did!

Man: Oh look, this isn't an argument!

(pause)

Other Man: Yes it is!

Man: No it isn't!

(pause)

Man: It's just contradiction!

Other Man: No it isn't!

Man: It IS!

Other Man: It is NOT!

Man: You just contradicted me!

Other Man: No I didn't!

Man: You DID!

Other Man: No no no!

Man: You did just then!

Other Man: Nonsense!

Man: (exasperated) Oh, this is futile!!

(pause)

Other Man: No it isn't!

Man: Yes it is!

(pause)

Man: I came here for a good argument!

Other Man: AH, no you didn't, you came here for an argument!

Man: An argument isn't just contradiction.

Other Man: Well! it CAN be!

Man: No it can't!

Man: An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.

Other Man: No it isn't!

Man: Yes it is! 'tisn't just contradiction.

Other Man: Look, if I "argue" with you, I must take up a contrary position!

Man: Yes but it isn't just saying 'no it isn't'.

Other Man: Yes it is!

Man: No it isn't!

Other Man: Yes it is!

Man: No it isn't!

Other Man: Yes it is!

Man: No it ISN'T! Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.

Other Man: It is NOT!

Man: It is!

Other Man: Not at all!

Man: It is!

(The Arguer hits a bell on his desk and stops.)

Other Man: Thank you, that's it.

Man: (stunned) What?

Other Man: That's it. Good morning.

Man: But I was just getting interested!

Other Man: I'm sorry, the five minutes is up.

Man: That was never five minutes just now!!

Other Man: I'm afraid it was.

Man: (leading on) No it wasn't.....

Other Man: I'm sorry, I'm not allowed to argue any more.

Man: WHAT??

Other Man: If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five minutes.

Man: But that was never five minutes just now!
Oh Come on!
Oh this is...
This is ridiculous!

Other Man: I told you... I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you PAY!

Man: Oh all right.
(takes out his wallet and pays again.)
There you are.

Other Man: Thank you.

Man: (clears throat) Well...

Other Man: Well WHAT?

Man: That was never five minutes just now.

Other Man: I told you, I'm not allowed to argue unless you've paid!

Man: Well I just paid!

Other Man: No you didn't!

Man: I DID!!!

Other Man: YOU didn't!

Man: I DID!!!

Other Man: YOU didn't!

Man: I DID!!!

Other Man: YOU didn't!

Man: I DID!!!

Other Man: YOU didn't!

Man: I don't want to argue about it!

Other Man: Well I'm very sorry but you didn't pay!

Man: Ah hah! Well if I didn't pay, why are you arguing???
Ah HAAAAAAHHH! Gotcha!

Other Man: No you haven't!

Man: Yes I have! If you're arguing, I must have paid.

Other Man: Not necessarily. I could be arguing in my spare time.

Man: I've had enough of this!

Other Man: No you haven't.

Man: Oh shut up!
Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #751 on: 00:56:14, 24-02-2008 »

Thanks, Andy! I've been wanting to read that for some time, believe it or not.
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #752 on: 01:03:53, 24-02-2008 »

I ignored that stupid comment about my playing the violin. But it wasn't particularly friendly was it?
Since you ask, it was intended to be friendly, yes, at that time I had no reason at all to be anything but friendly towards you, and if you find it stupid or offensive I take it back. As for your statement in post 735, it's an opinion you share with many others, including indeed myself sometimes, and you flatter yourself if you think it has any impact whatsoever. I hope messieurs les moderateurs and madame la moderatrice will allow me this one comment. And now let us perhaps return to the subject at hand. (Or, in my case, to the woodwork.)

I wish I'd had time to post some puzzles. I already know what my first three are going to be. Maybe I should just tell you all.
« Last Edit: 01:05:24, 24-02-2008 by richard barrett » Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #753 on: 10:04:20, 24-02-2008 »

I thought Baz's attempts at solutions for the Rzewski extract unworthy of anything other than a bland response. As attempts at humour, they don't really cut the mustard, do they?

While agreeing totally with Moderator Dough's comments, I am really quite amazed to discover that the setter of the Rzewski snatch actually considered my responses as 'attempts at solutions' to it (and I feel relieved rather than surprised that at least one composer among us (HH) felt empowered to see them as humorous).

The sorry turn this thread has taken started with queries as to what constituted 'repertoire', but soon became inflamed (and went out of control) when remarks started getting personal. The problem started with the following posting...

Just because a work falls out side the limited repertoire of one or two (again the same two) members here, does not mean it falls out side the repertoire of others.

Just for the records I would like to state that I take exception to this remark.

A

The specific point of A's objection was the words 'again the same two', which suggested that A and Baz were (as they had been adjudged a few months back on another thread) viewed as some kind of 'Gang of Two'. I also had difficulty with this, and for that reason have not contributed (until now) further. The reality is very different: both A and I work completely independently and have no idea what the other is posting. I rarely know her snatches, and she rarely mine. On occasions when either of us does know the other's, we both deliberately do NOT post responses (because we are aware of a widespread misconception that we work in collusion with each other, which we never do).

There have been some postings by others, too, that suggest the assumption that we are working together as a 'Gang of Two'. One of Bryn's postings to A (earlier in this thread) actually mentioned the instance of the Mozart K297b snatch - which was, of course, one of the snatches I posted (not A). Now we are both quite independent members - some of our views on things are similar, and some are not. As independent people we (not surprisingly) react differently to a common problem: while I tend to withdraw and think things through carefully before responding, A tends to take things a little more emotionally and react impulsively (I hope you don't mind my saying this A, but I think it is true!).

With regard to the 'repertoire' question, I would not presume to declare what should constitute repertoire - indeed one of the really fascinating things about the Test thread has been to learn about what to me are NEW pieces, and to see how these fit into the notions that others quite legitimately have of what to them constitutes 'repertoire'. Rzewski's music is by no means foreign to me, and I in no way have a dislike for it. But the snatch offered was unrecognizable, not only to me but also to everybody else. Indeed the eventual "solver" only arrived at the answer following the setter's unambiguous identification of the actual recording and even then declared that even he had never previously heard the piece. (Anybody could have come up with the correct answer with a simple bit of googling after that!).

Anyway, if my attempts at humour fell short of requirements I must apologise (especially as no insults were intended at all - just an expression of mystified exasperation that anything of substance could be gleaned from such a snatch, taken - as it had to be - out of its surrounding context). I am sure (though I cannot and would not speak for her) that A, too, feels sorry that some of the things she wrote inflamed the situation further (is this true A?). I should advise, however, that any further careless postings that paint the two of us as joint members of a 'Gang' will not only be factually incorrect, but likely (again) to start a round of postings that go out of control. We are NOT, and have no wish to be!

I do hope that we can all now put this behind us, remain friends, enjoy each others' MB company, and (above all) continue to enjoy the wonderful thread that Mr Grew invented for all our shared delights. I shall certainly try to do that.

Best wishes to all,

Baz
Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #754 on: 10:17:34, 24-02-2008 »

Mr. Smittims might have done quite well in this competition; used he not to work in a recording shop? Does any one know whether he has permanently withdrawn?
Logged
Ron Dough
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5133



WWW
« Reply #755 on: 10:18:39, 24-02-2008 »

Many thanks, Baz, for starting the ball rolling on this one: it is very much appreciated.

Ron
Logged
Morticia
Admin/Moderator Group
*****
Posts: 5788



« Reply #756 on: 10:35:17, 24-02-2008 »

Yes, thanks Baz for a considered response. Now, back to business!
Logged
opilec
****
Posts: 474



« Reply #757 on: 10:55:16, 24-02-2008 »

There has not yet been a puzzle containing Latin American music; so go HERE or HERE for puzzle 152.


"Latin American" my foot! That is from Beethoven's 1st Piano Concerto Op. 15 (Movt 3)!!

Well and speedily done Mr. Baziron! But why does it sound like a rumba? We have long been puzzled by that question.

Er ... because it's from Beethoven's Piano Concerto Rumba 1? Huh (dives for cover)
Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #758 on: 11:34:05, 24-02-2008 »

There has not yet been a puzzle containing Latin American music; so go HERE or HERE for puzzle 152.


"Latin American" my foot! That is from Beethoven's 1st Piano Concerto Op. 15 (Movt 3)!!

Well and speedily done Mr. Baziron! But why does it sound like a rumba? We have long been puzzled by that question.

Er ... because it's from Beethoven's Piano Concerto Rumba 1? Huh (dives for cover)

How so? It's a merengue!

(retires in search of Franck Symphony, movement 3)
Logged
opilec
****
Posts: 474



« Reply #759 on: 11:47:19, 24-02-2008 »

There has not yet been a puzzle containing Latin American music; so go HERE or HERE for puzzle 152.


"Latin American" my foot! That is from Beethoven's 1st Piano Concerto Op. 15 (Movt 3)!!

Well and speedily done Mr. Baziron! But why does it sound like a rumba? We have long been puzzled by that question.

Er ... because it's from Beethoven's Piano Concerto Rumba 1? Huh (dives for cover)

How so? It's a merengue!

That would explain why, the last time I heard it in concert, it was conducted by Sir Charles Maracas.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #760 on: 11:50:30, 24-02-2008 »

I must register huge exception to the prospect, touted by one member, of having a piece by Siegfried Karg-Elert used in this type of thread. I am sorry, but it is an objective truth that this is not music, and any who think otherwise are seriously deluding themselves. Why can people not see this for what it is, and stop pretending?
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
marbleflugel
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 918



WWW
« Reply #761 on: 12:13:31, 24-02-2008 »

The Franck symphony finale opening always makes me think of the Tiller Girls for some warped reason-overfast performance I played in/ heard I think...come to think of it you're right, it would work in 8/8 as a, what,merengue?
I'll get me poncho.
« Last Edit: 12:15:58, 24-02-2008 by marbleflugel » Logged

'...A  celebrity  is someone  who didn't get the attention they needed as an adult'

Arnold Brown
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #762 on: 12:31:17, 24-02-2008 »

I must register huge exception to the prospect, touted by one member, of having a piece by Siegfried Karg-Elert used in this type of thread. I am sorry, but it is an objective truth that this is not music, and any who think otherwise are seriously deluding themselves. Why can people not see this for what it is, and stop pretending?

Er . . . so what is it then?
Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #763 on: 12:45:50, 24-02-2008 »

Actually it is Sigfrid if we are not mistaken.
Logged
marbleflugel
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 918



WWW
« Reply #764 on: 14:06:15, 24-02-2008 »

I remember the name from school hymn books, and I believe his main thing was liturgical music (as it was perceived). Is he thought to have had neo-fascist leanings? (as opposed to the perpendicular democratic of the Tiller Girls)
Logged

'...A  celebrity  is someone  who didn't get the attention they needed as an adult'

Arnold Brown
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53 ... 104
  Print  
 
Jump to: