The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
08:27:24, 02-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 17
  Print  
Author Topic: The piano thread  (Read 7941 times)
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #135 on: 20:50:24, 09-05-2007 »

That's quite a coincidence! I grew up in Monrovia. My piano teacher charged a pittance. We were very very lucky to have him.

I am not saying no one loves classical music in the US, but a deep engagement with such things is the realm of the privileged, and anyone who tries to bring this stuff to the general population faces an uphill battle and deserves honorable mention. Let me give one example: the Young Musicians Program. Look at their site, or just go ahead and give them money. Founded in 1968 by the brilliant conductor, educator and musician Michael Senturia.
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #136 on: 21:03:04, 09-05-2007 »

Chafing Dish. I kind of know the situation. But people tell me that there are immigrants in New York from East Europe, that open music school and there are so many musicians from the former Soviet Union there. Many of them teach privately.
Also I am in the West of Ireland now and situation here is not good for classical music and education. It costs so much to bring up a child and give him/her musical education. It frightens me just to look at parents driving their children for music lessons and other lessons and I don't know how they can do it.

In America they don't value music education as much, but still there are people who take music at the Universities (and ballet). At least there were students taking it while I was living in S Ca.
The bad thing here and in the USA is that pop music is promoted heavily as a kind of drug or therapy for children. Children get hooked on it.

Also Julliard and other places (Curtis) still attract the talented young musicians from all over the world (may be less from the USA).
I think the classical music and piano music in particularly will survive in the United State, though many musicians I know are very frustrated.
I am often frustrated here and I was frustrated in S CA.
« Last Edit: 22:33:59, 09-05-2007 by trained-pianist » Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #137 on: 08:24:19, 10-05-2007 »

I played for my friend yesterday. He is a good pianist. He doesn't correct me when I play other composers much. He thinks I know how to play many of them (like Rachmaninoff) and that I have a good idea how it should be done.
But when I play his pieces he either corrects me or makes suggestions.

I learned from him that when playing Irish music one should remember how singers sing or rather a declamation. A singer takes a breath and then sing the phrase, after there is kind of a pose until he takes another breath etc.
I tried to play Chopin's cantilena this way, but it doesn't work. It is something very Irish I think. But without this Irish slow airs sound mechanical and not beautiful. I don't know may be Scots do the same in their slow airs and may be Welsh.
The second thing we were discussion was legato. I had some problems with his figurations. They are fast up and down arpeggio type or runs with missing some arpeggio notes (often skipping the fifth and repetition changing  position on tonic). He said that he also was taught to play legato and legatissimo and turning his thumb etc. But we have to unlearn what we were taught and do what works.

I tried to play by positions and very lose hand and arm. It worked well. I am excited to practice it now. The sound is much better when I don't hang on each note trying to make it legato or legatissimo.

We already talked a little about legato and I thought may be some people have something to add to the subject.

Daniel,
The site can be useful to me. I laughted at some of the post and saw that people go through similar things when teaching children.
I am trying to learn from everybody, piano teachers and musicians and none musicians etc. It is a little discouraging to know that people learn piano to unlearn it later on.
Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #138 on: 08:52:56, 10-05-2007 »

The best thing is to take difficult passages and make one's own etudes out of them.

An even better thing would be to make either the instrument or the music or both easier to play. That is the rationale of the player-piano, is it not? Instead of publishing a printed score alone, composers could get into the habit of publishing a player-piano roll (or in the case of orchestral music, a MIDI file) as well. This then, not the printed score, could serve as the starting point for the performer on a new simplified set of instruments. The mechanism could take care of the sequencing of the notes, and all the performer would have to do would be to add his own musical expression (only where the composer requests and allows it, of course).

Quite seriously, should not something be done to make the playing of all instruments less difficult? If long courses of study over several years were not required, it would be much easier for people in general to become enthusiastic about performing serious music. All those who now perform it on their CD player or player-piano could come together and perform it in chamber groups on their own simplified instruments. What a revolution that could be!
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #139 on: 09:31:44, 10-05-2007 »

This is a good idea from Sydney Grew. The printed score is an approximation anyway.
For contemporary pieces it is often hard to know and understand how they should be played. May be a score could come with a sample of how the composer thinks it should be played. It is a new idea for the XXI century.
Logged
Ian Pace
Temporary Restriction
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4190



« Reply #140 on: 09:36:26, 10-05-2007 »

Various composers have done this or do this (or something equivalent, producing versions for performers to listen to via Sibelius or Finale, to accompany a score). The distinction that Sydney makes between the 'sequencing of the notes' and 'musical expression' is, however, hard to maintain meaningfully. The two things are not so easily separable - exactly how one sequences the notes, or does the equivalent on one's instrument, itself affects the musical expression. The model presented suggests a clear dichotomy between some objective work (produced by simply 'playing the notes') and expression as a type of garnish added afterwards. That certainly does not accord with my own experience, including with highly complex contemporary works. In the whole process of devising one's one individual strategies for realising the score, all sorts of decisions which affect the musical expression are being undertaken.
Logged

'These acts of keeping politics out of music, however, do not prevent musicology from being a political act . . .they assure that every apolitical act assumes a greater political immediacy' - Philip Bohlman, 'Musicology as a Political Act'
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #141 on: 09:47:39, 10-05-2007 »

Mr Sydney Crew wrote: Quite seriously, should not something be done to make the playing of all instruments less difficult?
I often think why are there not more good teachers? There are so many opinions about what a good teacher is anyway. Is it the one who understand the needs of his student and puts their interests before one's own. Or is he a machine who produces good pianists some of who become great pianists by the bandle?
Is he a technition that gives his students technical means and tools and they then interpret music according to their individuality?
Is he the one who can push their career forward because of his influence in the world of music?

I think that teaching to play is a speciality and one need to have a develp different way of thinking.
It is as different as to play solo and accompany. Teaching is an art in its own right.


For example, I don't think I am such a great teacher. First of all I still have many unanswered questions. I have to experiment a lot (by myself and with each student) to find what works and what doesn't and some times (I don't know how often) I can not find a satisfactory solution and I don't like the result.

For example, I am playing De Falla piece that is very well known and was arranged by Millshtein for the violin.

There are several bars there that are akward and I can not play without slowing down significantly. He was probably a good pianist himself, but for an average one like myself it is not easy. So I was thinking the unthinkable. I was thinking I will not play some notes, but will keep the rhythm of the pasadoble.

Now I said it, I am afraid for what kinds of replies I will get. In my defence I can say that Liszt often had assai written in his scores. Other composers have done it too.
Logged
Jonathan
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1473


Still Lisztening...


WWW
« Reply #142 on: 13:40:44, 10-05-2007 »

Personally, I used to detest scales and avoided playing them as often as possible and only really played them when I was due to sit an ABRSM exam.  As for Hanon, I've never tried it but I can think of no better way to turn you into an automaton than playing through all of that (having looked at it and thought "no"!  In order to increase my stamina and strength, I used to paractise everything in octaves, it worked when I was younger but I don't do it any more.  I'm quite happy to play musical studies (Chopin's, Liszt's etc.) as the musical part of them overrides any sense of repetitious technical practising (IMHO).
Back to work now...
Logged

Best regards,
Jonathan
*********************************************
"as the housefly of destiny collides with the windscreen of fate..."
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #143 on: 17:03:01, 10-05-2007 »

I found that people are so different. Some people hate scales, but will play a nice easy going study. Even Hanons work for some people. I myself never used them.
Some people prefer scales and arpeggios to studies.
Some people never play anything and their technique is perfect.
That is life I suppose. We all are so different.

But on the subject of legato I completely changed my stand. No more finger legato for me. Also positional playing is much better than legato in long arpeggio figurations. Relaxation is the key for good sound, not turning of one's thumb.
« Last Edit: 17:04:35, 10-05-2007 by trained-pianist » Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #144 on: 19:48:48, 12-05-2007 »

When I was in school my teacher recommended that I practice technical pieces with staggered rhythm (dotted eight (quever) and sixteen) and staccato (wrist and finger) and other ways if I could find it.
Do people still practice like that?
Logged
Chafing Dish
Guest
« Reply #145 on: 21:57:18, 12-05-2007 »

When I was in school my teacher recommended that I practice technical pieces with staggered rhythm (dotted eight (quever) and sixteen) and staccato (wrist and finger) and other ways if I could find it.
Do people still practice like that?

Yes! If the original is straight eighth notes, then making dotted rhythms does help by enriching the pathways in your cerebellum that learn the passage. But ideally you spend the same amount of time doing the reverse (Scotch snaps - sorry, Grewbies). In fact, any alteration of the rhythm in unexpected ways will improve these pathways, as long as one doesn't overestimate the value of the exercise.
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #146 on: 21:59:18, 12-05-2007 »

The other idea would be exaggerate intonation and listen to small intonational pulls, but not in a very fast piece like Weber.
Thank you Chafing Dish for your help.
Logged
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #147 on: 08:39:10, 13-05-2007 »

My students that are doing Royal Irish Academy exams underperformed this year. They tell me that examiners are very sour (they change them) and they got very nervous etc. Several came out crying.

I wrote about my experience to my friend and this is a reply I got. I want to share it with you.
On the whole I am not happy with RIA system. I am going to move my students gradually to associated board. (may be the weakest can do RIA). The peoblem with the irish academy is that they have very low standards. May be they have different standards for Dublin and the rest of the country. The other explanation may be that they are raising their requirement in which case it is a good thing.


I remember the first exam I did for the RIAM (having started with the London College of Music). The Academy sent down a horribly ugly bad-tempered and bad mannered woman whom many years later I came to recognise as the wife of the ignorant and curmudgeonly music critic of the Iriah Times - the notorious Charles Acton. The shock was frightful compared to the lovely people who came over from England. At my very first exam which was held in a big house on the outskirts of Cavan which had a grand piano there was a revolving piano stool. I had never encountered one before and managed to fall off it just as I was about to start playing. I started to cry. The lovely English gentleman examiner promptly produced a box of sweets and had a great little chat with me about Cavan and music and pianostools and his experiences with them, got me settled and I payed so well I got First Honours or distinction or something. If I'd fallen off the stool for Carol Acton she'd probably have kicked me while I was down as well as failing me in the exam. The Academy has done its share of career blighting and excluding but there are some great prople there too, its a pity they dont select more user friendly good with people examiners

Logged
increpatio
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2544


‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮


« Reply #148 on: 15:04:47, 13-05-2007 »

t-p, do you do you have students with both the associated board and the RIAM?  When you started teaching in ireland, did you pick one, or were you always using both?

I have to say, from my experience, the whole examining process with the RIAM things is variable, but for me the people have never been nasty, merely often quite cold.  My sister had someone give out to her once when she was in an exam.

May be they have different standards for Dublin and the rest of the country. The other explanation may be that they are raising their requirement in which case it is a good thing.

I find it amusing that students of the Academy itself don't always do their official grades, but rather they have their own internal system of "levels".  I'm not sure exactly how the two mix, as I only went to the academy after finishing up my grades, though, so.
Logged

‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮
trained-pianist
*****
Posts: 5455



« Reply #149 on: 15:18:31, 13-05-2007 »

I started with Royal Irish Academy. I did not know about Associated board.
I can not say they are bad. This year they seems to be cold and not friendly, but last years there were nice friendly people here. It all depends.
The standards I find strange. I have now enough experience with them.
It is very easy to pass exams of RIA if you are not in Dublin (I don't know how it is in Dublin).
All you have to do is to show up. To fail it one has to be really bad.
On the other hand when we come to diploma the criteria changes all the sudden. The bar is raised and people don't understand.
How these peole reach grade 7, 8 or senior certificate I don't know, but I have to deal with it on a regular basis. The people are not ready for the difficult pieces that are on the list. It is difficult to explain to them that they were duped.

I was in the Academy itself once, accompanying violin dimpoma. It was not pleasant at all. I don't know why they had to be so cold. I was not examined and I had easy part (Bruch violin concerto, Beethoven Romance and something else I don't remember) and even I was not comfortable.

Their head is pleasant enough fellow although I never met him personally. I do't know why the whole thing is set up like that. I can not say that the pieces in grade books are bad.
My criticism is that they don't demand theory earlier and that the standard is so strange.

In my opinion many people here had to be failed. This would of course make them not popular. Majority of people only trying it for several years anyway. I really don't know what to say, but sometimes I see people passing exams with ok marks (80 89%) and they are not good at all. The ones that get bellow really should fail.

I don't know if I am right. This is something that I just started to think about recently.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 17
  Print  
 
Jump to: