The Radio 3 Boards Forum from myforum365.com
04:38:58, 01-12-2008 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Whilst we happily welcome all genuine applications to our forum, there may be times when we need to suspend registration temporarily, for example when suffering attacks of spam.
 If you want to join us but find that the temporary suspension has been activated, please try again later.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  

Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 46
  Print  
Author Topic: At Least Ninety-Six Crackpot Interpretations  (Read 11251 times)
Baz
Guest
« Reply #495 on: 11:23:27, 23-07-2008 »

. . . our own clavichord . . .

Long ago almost every Englishman ran to a clavichord in his parlour but now the Member finds himself among the fortunate few does not he. Is it then possible does he think that we might hear it in something?


We seldom find ourselves able not to comply with perfectly reasonable requests from this Member who, through sheer impishness, wishes always to challenge us! So - provided that he does not mind the closeness of the microphone that transmits some "clatter", or the fact that the instrument has over time resided a full tone lower than A440, or that some maintenance is overdue and that some of the tangents clatter more than they should - here is what it currently sounds like!...

Clavichord

Baz
« Last Edit: 11:29:48, 23-07-2008 by Baz » Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #496 on: 13:22:54, 23-07-2008 »

. . . because Gustav is a human being rather than a computer we feel through his playing a natural flexibility that (without hindering the rhythmic impetus and movement) allows the melodic and harmonic elements to sing through clearly, and by these to convey a subtle sense of phrasing and dynamics.

Gustav is indeed very good - most of the time.

I'm a bit surprised by that: his "rhythm" seems a bit awkward and inconsistent to me - rushed 4th beats and the like. Is he not Mr. Varyspeed?

We are unable to hear the slightest deviation of pulse in his performance - despite repeated listenings since the above posting. Perhaps member autoharp could assist by pointing us to those moments (which must, we think, be extremely isolated ones) where Gustav's very tight rhythm seems (to him) a little "slack"?

Baz
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #497 on: 14:14:26, 23-07-2008 »


To-day's very daft interpretation is of the Fugue in G major from Bach's first Book (rapid-share or send-space). As Tovey says, it is very rich in its themes. It is also very difficult to play at exactly the right tempo. Riemann - perhaps in an attempt to titillate his readers - remarks on the subject's "wanton leaps from the under-fourth and the under-leading-note."

As comparison let us listen first to Jaroslav again, and then to Glenn. Each of them gives a worthwhile performance although one is around twice as fast as the other! At first we had intended to present Samuel's here, but upon hearing his rendition of the G minor Fugue we thought it so wonderful that in two days' time we shall present that instead. Incidentally a recording of his twelve Sonatas has now arrived, many of them the first recorded performances. In the liner notes we read that in 1914 Samuel was the first pianist in Russia to perform Bach's complete Well-Tempered Clavier in concert. He was a very cultured man, spiritual, modest, and with a profound dislike of self-promotion. After his expiry in 1962 his deeply admiring pupils published his book, entitled "Pianism as an Art." Does any Member know it?


Jaroslav's is an entirely pedestrian performance. We normally associate 6/8 with a pulse of 2 beats per bar - Jaroslav gives us 6! It is little wonder, then, that Glenn takes only half as long to play the same piece. BUT...

...Glenn spoils everything for us (again) by his sheer impatience! First, he is clearly miffed enough that the piece (even though it follows the normal fugal pattern) opens with only a single line of notes that he finds it necessary to add an impromptu (and very out-of-tune) vocalised bass countersubject (that occurs in none of the sources with which we are familiar). Second, he is clearly annoyed that Bach wrote the piece in 6/8 instead of 2/4 (with triplet notation), and has decided that a performance according to this convention will unnecessarily delay him - so he decides instead to use the piece as yet another vehicle suitable only for showing his ability to get through as many notes in as short a time as is possible. Even then he continues to show great impatience during the episodes (Bach's carefully-constructed counterpoints notwithstanding) by showering our ears with ever more completely alien (and even more out-of-tune) vocalisations.

Worst of all, however, is the completely SILLY way he ends the movement! Having fooled us into believing that the whole exploit was intended to "show off" his digital dexterity, he then (rather like Angela often does) SULKS at the final cadence - it merely fades away into a silly pianissimo almost as if he is afraid to admit that instead of having just finished a performance of a quiet movement from Schumann's Kinderscenen he has (apologetically) to admit that it was - after all - a fugue by Bach!

So we must, we think, ask all rational members the following: are not all the above issues completely and effectively addressed again (as always) by GUSTAV?

Baz
« Last Edit: 14:16:00, 23-07-2008 by Baz » Logged
Sydney Grew
Guest
« Reply #498 on: 14:27:41, 23-07-2008 »

. . . here is what it currently sounds like!...

Clavichord

Baz

Marvellous stuff - and much appreciated - thank you!
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #499 on: 14:44:57, 23-07-2008 »

Here I find myself as so often in complete agreement with Mr Grew. That is a great pleasure to hear, Mr Iron, and, if I may say so, suffused with something of the spirit of Gustav himself. I had only previously heard this piece once on such an instrument, in a recording by Colin which I'm afraid I can't contribute not having it presently to hand, and his instrument has to my ears a somewhat unpleasantly nasal and mechanical tone, which chafes after a few preludes and fugues. (He only uses it for book 1 though, and his harpsichord in Book 2 is very fine indeed, as is his playing).

I wonder, though, what members think about slowing down at the ends of movements in music of this period. Was it actually regarded as a tasteful thing to do in those times? I don't recall ever seeing any primary literature on the subject, being but an enthusiastic amateur of baroque music.
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #500 on: 16:11:43, 23-07-2008 »

...I wonder, though, what members think about slowing down at the ends of movements in music of this period. Was it actually regarded as a tasteful thing to do in those times? I don't recall ever seeing any primary literature on the subject, being but an enthusiastic amateur of baroque music.

Slowing down in Baroque music at the ends of movements has always been a bone of contention. The default assumption by modern players (especially those used to later repertoires) is that one must always do it. This is probably not a false assumption, but the question is: if so, by how much?

There are basically two differing kinds of "slowing down": a) some time before the end a deliberately-paced rallentando is imposed that signals, well in advance, that at an easily-calculable distance into the future the piece will come to a definitive end; and b) one that a performer applies (perhaps out of courtesy to the listeners) that merely pinpoints the arrival of the final cadence/chord as a point of structure. In the former, a rallentando has been applied strategically so as to become itself an indispensable part of the structure of the piece. As such it is customarily actually specified by the composer, together with other elements of articulation or dynamic. In the latter it is often the case that no indication of slowing down is given by the composer, but that a slight easing of tempo is applied merely to signal the definitive arrival of the end of the movement. It is, of course, the latter case that applied to Baroque music since nobody at that time every (at least to my knowledge) indicated the directions rit. or rall.

However, there were other means composers had of signalling a wish to slow down. Many Baroque pieces (the obvious example being the infamous Bach D Minor Toccata BWV 565) apply terms like "Largo" or "Adagio" for the last bar or so, implying (in some way) a definite slowing down, or relaxation of pace. 17th-century English musical sources also use the English term drag to indicate a slowing of pace.

There are some interesting citations in Robert Donington's The Interpretation of Early Music, two pages of which appear below:





These might be of some help, but in the end I feel that a player's sense of "good taste" has the final word. Unfortunately many players seem to lack this (!) and we are none the wiser.

Baz
Logged
richard barrett
*****
Posts: 3123



« Reply #501 on: 16:25:43, 23-07-2008 »

Very interesting. (I'm sure I have a copy of Donington somewhere.) Although no special reference is made to the ends of entire pieces or movements, is it? Are we therefore to assume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that final slowings-down are not to be distinguished from those which might occur at intermediate cadences? And where does ensemble music fit into this?

I was forming the impression that final ritenuti were going out of favour in Baroque music these days, possibly under the influence of Reinhard and his critical attitude to the "receivedness" of "authentic" performance practice. Given that Reinhard has often employed our friend Léon in the continuo department, though, perhaps he is to be regarded as something of a crackpot.
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #502 on: 16:48:18, 23-07-2008 »

Very interesting. (I'm sure I have a copy of Donington somewhere.) Although no special reference is made to the ends of entire pieces or movements, is it? Are we therefore to assume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that final slowings-down are not to be distinguished from those which might occur at intermediate cadences? And where does ensemble music fit into this?

Donington's final par. (above) does seem to refer to ends of movements/pieces. Some players take these things to extremes, as we know from Mr Grew's postings of Wanda! Whenever she plays the repeats in binary-form movements, her rallentandi at the ends of each and every section (before repeating them even) are as long and drawn-out as at the very ends.

Quote
I was forming the impression that final ritenuti were going out of favour in Baroque music these days, possibly under the influence of Reinhard and his critical attitude to the "receivedness" of "authentic" performance practice. Given that Reinhard has often employed our friend Léon in the continuo department, though, perhaps he is to be regarded as something of a crackpot.

Final ritenuti do seem rather a thing of the past, and the alternative seems to be (often with good effect) merely to insert a moment's hestitation before playing the final chord. I expect in ensemble music this is purely a matter for decision at rehearsal, and would be controlled (after agreement) by whoever leads the ensemble (whether the principal violinist, or the continuo player perhaps).

I feel that a musical discourse - just like a verbal one - should naturally contain modulations of pitch and speed. It is, after all, quite natural for a spoken sentence to have a slight slowing down at its end, together with a falling of pitch. (We should never wish to sound like daleks should we?) I don't see why a musical sentence should be different, though striking just the right stylistic balance and effect is a very different matter.

Baz
« Last Edit: 16:50:52, 23-07-2008 by Baz » Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #503 on: 17:01:14, 23-07-2008 »

. . . because Gustav is a human being rather than a computer we feel through his playing a natural flexibility that (without hindering the rhythmic impetus and movement) allows the melodic and harmonic elements to sing through clearly, and by these to convey a subtle sense of phrasing and dynamics.

Gustav is indeed very good - most of the time.

I'm a bit surprised by that: his "rhythm" seems a bit awkward and inconsistent to me - rushed 4th beats and the like. Is he not Mr. Varyspeed?

We are unable to hear the slightest deviation of pulse in his performance - despite repeated listenings since the above posting. Perhaps member autoharp could assist by pointing us to those moments (which must, we think, be extremely isolated ones) where Gustav's very tight rhythm seems (to him) a little "slack"?

Baz

Take the first few bars: to my ears there's quite a bit of uneveness amongst the semiquavers and some of the groups of 3 seem rushed as a result (e.g., groups 4 + 8 in bars 1 + 2 + the first half of bar 3). Overall bars 4 + 5 seem a whisker slower. Am I being too fussy? How about the 7th group of 3 notes in bar 6?
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #504 on: 17:26:34, 23-07-2008 »

. . . because Gustav is a human being rather than a computer we feel through his playing a natural flexibility that (without hindering the rhythmic impetus and movement) allows the melodic and harmonic elements to sing through clearly, and by these to convey a subtle sense of phrasing and dynamics.

Gustav is indeed very good - most of the time.

I'm a bit surprised by that: his "rhythm" seems a bit awkward and inconsistent to me - rushed 4th beats and the like. Is he not Mr. Varyspeed?

We are unable to hear the slightest deviation of pulse in his performance - despite repeated listenings since the above posting. Perhaps member autoharp could assist by pointing us to those moments (which must, we think, be extremely isolated ones) where Gustav's very tight rhythm seems (to him) a little "slack"?

Baz

Take the first few bars: to my ears there's quite a bit of uneveness amongst the semiquavers and some of the groups of 3 seem rushed as a result (e.g., groups 4 + 8 in bars 1 + 2 + the first half of bar 3). Overall bars 4 + 5 seem a whisker slower. Am I being too fussy? How about the 7th group of 3 notes in bar 6?

Well we are damned if we can hear that at all! Bars 1-3 seem to us (like all the other bars) to be very tight in rhythm with no (to us) discernible alteration of pulse or subdivision thereof. We are unable in any way to notice (despite repeated listenings) any difference in tempo/articulation/anything between the 7th group in bar 6 and any of the surrounding groups whatsoever.

Further, what we hear in bars 4/5 is a movement that, while maintaining strictly the same tempo as the surrounding bars (and all other bars within the piece), suddenly allows a legato melody to sing through. While this does not - as we have calculated - in any way change the pulse, it does change the Affect - which suddenly seems more relaxed in mood.

Perhaps it must be our own ears - they are not getting younger!

Baz
Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #505 on: 17:41:23, 23-07-2008 »

Well! I guess we are listening to the same recording! I find a "uneasy" moment at the end of almost all the early bars. The 7th group in bar 6 seemed particularly sinful. We await other opinions with bated breath!
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #506 on: 17:48:26, 23-07-2008 »

Well! I guess we are listening to the same recording! I find a "uneasy" moment at the end of almost all the early bars. The 7th group in bar 6 seemed particularly sinful. We await other opinions with bated breath!

Indeed - we are (I assume) talking about THIS RECORDING?

Baz
Logged
autoharp
*****
Posts: 2778



« Reply #507 on: 18:20:59, 23-07-2008 »

Indeed we are!
Logged
Baz
Guest
« Reply #508 on: 18:24:55, 23-07-2008 »

Indeed we are!

Other members?...
Logged
martle
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 6685



« Reply #509 on: 19:47:19, 23-07-2008 »

It's pretty generalised, but for what it's worth I'm with autoharp on this one. The performance seems uncomfortably insecure in tempo - as if the wrong basic tempo had been chosen initially and adjustments necessarily made as the performance goes on. Also (without a score to hand), aren't the dotted quavers in the LH about two thirds in cut woefully short?
Logged

Green. Always green.
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 ... 46
  Print  
 
Jump to: